View Single Post
Old 07-04-22, 07:22 PM
  #4  
Ironfish653
Dirty Heathen
 
Ironfish653's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,188

Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times in 534 Posts
Originally Posted by Rolla
I wouldn't buy a smaller frame, no matter the purpose or style of the bike. Proper positioning will make the bike more controllable and the ride more comfortable; I'd want both on a fixed gear bike.

I also wouldn't go strictly by the "frame size"; compare the stack, reach, and standover heights of one of your current bikes to whatever FG you're considering. Sometimes a 53 is really a 55 (and vice-versa).
I'm aware of how to measure and size a bike, but I'm not going to call FB/CL listings and ask them to measure the stack and reach on a >$200 fixie. Wouldn't be worth the frustration.

I was more asking along the line of whether with regards to F/G if it's better to have a bike that's a little on the small side, than too large. I figured, since you can't stop pedaling, that it'd be preferable to have the clearance of a little smaller bike between your knees.
Ironfish653 is offline