View Single Post
Old 07-15-22, 08:56 AM
  #9  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by bargainguy
I had a SlingShot road in yellow. My thoughts:

1. The fold was crazy. Having to maneuver a cable at high tension is not for the faint hearted!

2. The ride quality was strange, almost disconnected in a way. It was like riding a bike without a down tube, because that's exactly what it was.

3. The cable was supposed to store tension like a spring and release it during the power stroke, but I'm not sure it worked out that way. I never felt more efficient on this bike than any other.

4. In the end, I sold it as a curiosity. The fold was too difficult, the ride quality too disconnected, and I moved on.

Oh, and by the way, the company with a similar design is Puma:

https://www.campfirecycling.com/blog...the-glow-rider
So the Slingshot was intended to have a sort of "planing" behavior!

I could certainly see the hinged/spring frame main triangle providing shock absorption, but I'm not sure about beneficial energy return to the task of pulling the chain.

Last edited by Road Fan; 07-15-22 at 09:00 AM.
Road Fan is offline