Old 01-01-23, 12:00 PM
  #7  
Bah Humbug
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times in 2,026 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
I get this for the geometry: https://www.scott-sports.com/us/en/p...icle=286425054

Stack is 572.4 and reach is 390.9. That's way too big. I'm 168cm with an 83cm cycling inseam and 72-73cm saddle height. I'd pick the 47 or 49cm size. I see that this is an endurance bike, but that usually calls for a 20mm taller stack with no increase in reach. The 52 has too much reach, unless a 90-100mm stem is used.

Most bikes have a headset top cover that adds 10-20mm to the stack. My bikes are setup for a racing fit, so my saddle to bar drop is 10cm. That's what I get with a 505mm stack, plus the 10mm headset top cover and one 10mm spacer, with a -7 degree stem.
Amazingly, that means it's taller and only a hair shorter than my 56 S1. That's huge for a 54.
Bah Humbug is offline