Old 02-28-23, 02:14 PM
  #110  
UniChris
Senior Member
 
UniChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909

Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times in 282 Posts
Originally Posted by GhostRider62
Wrong there are three alternatives. Both light years safer.

Take the segregated footbath across that bridge.
Prohibited to cyclists.

Take another bridge.
The other bridge has the same problem.

If your answer is "walk across" then you are perpetuating the car brained problem of seeing bikes as toys rather than transport.

Cycling is only safe when cycling is seen as legitimate.

It has been ruled to be so on that bridge which means that the danger is precisely from reactionary anti-bike attitudes of the sort you are pushing.

What a key local/commuting route like Bethlehem's Fahy bridge needs is even more people riding it so that everyone comes to recognize that the presence of cyclists as routine, proper, and expected as that of any other wheeled conveyance allowed to be there.

Last edited by UniChris; 02-28-23 at 02:40 PM.
UniChris is offline  
Likes For UniChris: