Originally Posted by
Kontact
.We can have a debate about whether roller wear is a factor in cog wear, and I am entirely open to being shown to be wrong. Just as I admitted a few posts ago that the new Park tool removes the rollers from the measure. But we can't have a conversation about the topic of roller wear if people don't understand where the parts of the chain are. And that stuff ends up being half the posts.
You don’t seem to understand how this works.
You made the claim that roller wear is important and
has to be taken into account. So it is up to
you to demonstrate your own point. I
have shown you that you are wrong by pointing out that rule measurement and chain checker tool measurement give the same results. If
you have evidence to the contrary, by all means present it.
It is tough having an engineering conversation mixed with remedial topology. Especially when the people that really don't get it are insulting.
At no point have I insulted you. I have patiently explained to you why you are incorrect but I have never been insulting.