I dont think the article is anti-helmet.
Its not arguing the benefits of wearing one, only peoples choice in the matter.
Its pointing out anti-commonsense, to me.
In Pennsyslvania when they were debating the helmet laws for motorcycles
ABATE supporters and others were, without laffing at themselves, saying
helmets were more dangerous than not wearing them and gave a myriad of
reasons why they supposedly were. People have thier priorities and no
overbearing authoritarian agancy is going to change them, whatever they
might be or no matter how ludicris.
__________________
☞
-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say
"NO"