View Single Post
Old 05-05-06, 12:41 PM
  #5  
bwgride
Slow Rider
 
bwgride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,043
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Peterpan1
135 is standard on touring bikes. My recent touring frame was a perfect fit for 135. Some custom bikes use 145 spacing for tandem hubs, there is a 165 hub also, and maybe someone will use that some day. The advantage to wider hubs is wider lateral spoke staying base. The strength of the support varies as to the cosine of the angle at the hub. With the 145 hubs, however, these tandem hubs do not necesarilly have wider spacing since they carry drum brakes on the non-freewheel side. So one shouldn't assume every wider hub is an improvement in spoke angle or symetry.
Do you have a forumla for calculating relative strength/weakness of spokes from drive to non-drive side for rear hubs?
bwgride is offline