View Single Post
Old 06-27-03, 03:16 AM
  #14  
trmcgeehan
Senior Member
 
trmcgeehan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somerset, KY -- near Lake Cumberland
Posts: 757

Bikes: 1980 Univega; 1985 Ross; 1994 Trek 1400 -- all road bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have given blood for 20+ years. Then my blood tested "false positive" for what I don't know. They refused to take my blood, and gave me the name of a doctor to call. Scared me spitless! I called the doc, and she told me not to worry, it was a false positive. But then, the next time I went to give blood, they turned me down again. They said even though I had a false positive, there is a 1 in 3,000,000 chance the false positive reading could actually be positive. They said I could never give blood again, and I have 0-, which is in great demand. Almost every day, I hear radio ads pleading for blood donors -- the bank is running low. It seems to me they are a bit too picky in the name of blood safety. If you needed a critical operation that couldn't wait, would you take a 1 in 3,000,000 chance the blood was bad? I think I would.
__________________
"I am a true laborer. I earn that I eat, get that I wear, owe no man hate, envy no man's happiness, glad of other men's good, content with my harm." As You Like It, Act 3, Scene 2. Shakespeare.
"Deep down, I'm pretty superficial." Ava Gardner.
trmcgeehan is offline