Originally Posted by joejack951
Anyway, that's your opinion of his argument based on an obvious unwillingness to try and understand what he's saying. You've demonstrated in many posts that you just don't seem to understand the concept or intentionally misinterpret the words in an attempt to make HH look foolish.
I'm not intentionally trying to misinterpret anything, and I've read the whole "inattentional blindness" page that he keeps incessantly citing. I still see nothing that suggests that recommending that all cyclists take the lane is any more effective than any other method, and given the level of experience that most cyclists have with riding in traffic, I think it's dangerous.
And I won't even go into his delivery method.