2016 battenkill
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
2016 battenkill
for those who raced last year (e.g., @globecanvas, @thekillerpenguin)... will the decision to go unsanctioned for this year affect your decision to race?
i'd say it has a minor negative impact on my decision. first, the loss of the UCI race (i understand why) knocked down the prestige a slight bit, and then the loss (conscious decision) of sanction takes it down a little further, IMO.
i know the date change is significant. i was actually excited about the later date when it was rumored last year; i thought perhaps i could come out, race battenkill (2x), chill for a few days, then race KSR. however, with masters nationals around the same time it means battenkill is probably out for me.
i'm a little sad about that. i've felt that the race itself was very well run and a true racer's course for the 3 races i've done.
a couple friends i spoke with felt like the move to 1-day status makes them less likely to travel a great distance -- no change to race 2 days.
i'm curious if you'll race this year and what impact the departure from USAC has, specifically, on your decision.
i'd say it has a minor negative impact on my decision. first, the loss of the UCI race (i understand why) knocked down the prestige a slight bit, and then the loss (conscious decision) of sanction takes it down a little further, IMO.
i know the date change is significant. i was actually excited about the later date when it was rumored last year; i thought perhaps i could come out, race battenkill (2x), chill for a few days, then race KSR. however, with masters nationals around the same time it means battenkill is probably out for me.
i'm a little sad about that. i've felt that the race itself was very well run and a true racer's course for the 3 races i've done.
a couple friends i spoke with felt like the move to 1-day status makes them less likely to travel a great distance -- no change to race 2 days.
i'm curious if you'll race this year and what impact the departure from USAC has, specifically, on your decision.
#2
Ninny
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Gunks
Posts: 5,295
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'll probably do it. There are already some murderers signed up in the masters fields. I expect the competition level in the masters will actually be higher than last year, mostly due to the calendar, and I don't think most masters racers care about the lack of USAC sanction. I'm sure there will be many fewer P12 racers than in the past.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The date change has caused a lot of grief for others, but DD did announce this very early, which was appreciated.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'll probably do it. There are already some murderers signed up in the masters fields. I expect the competition level in the masters will actually be higher than last year, mostly due to the calendar, and I don't think most masters racers care about the lack of USAC sanction. I'm sure there will be many fewer P12 racers than in the past.
seems like mid-atlantic racers would face about the same drive for either one.
#6
out walking the earth
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
lol.
In all honesty, we'll see. Depends on a bunch of factors. If things stay as they currently are I'll more than likely be there. If not, it depends.
In all honesty, we'll see. Depends on a bunch of factors. If things stay as they currently are I'll more than likely be there. If not, it depends.
#11
Slam That Stem.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY; Portland ME
Posts: 47
Bikes: Quattro Assi DBS, Cannondale XR800, Felt Breed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Kind of a bummer for me. Battenkill is on the short list of climber's races, and I'm hungry for upgrade points. I assume that it being a non-USAC race then good results won't count towards upgrades.
#12
Ninny
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Gunks
Posts: 5,295
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
1 - Battenkill is not a climber's race. It's a hard man's race, a power course. The longest climb is 5-6 minutes.
2 - In theory results won't count towards USAC upgrades. However I think this is actually at the discretion of individual upgrade coordinators. I would not be surprised if some upgrade coordinators did accept it. You could check beforehand with the upgrade coordinator for your area. Heck, @DieterDrake is, or was, a USAC upgrade coordinator.
#13
Slam That Stem.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY; Portland ME
Posts: 47
Bikes: Quattro Assi DBS, Cannondale XR800, Felt Breed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1 - Battenkill is not a climber's race. It's a hard man's race, a power course. The longest climb is 5-6 minutes.
2 - In theory results won't count towards USAC upgrades. However I think this is actually at the discretion of individual upgrade coordinators. I would not be surprised if some upgrade coordinators did accept it. You could check beforehand with the upgrade coordinator for your area. Heck, @DieterDrake is, or was, a USAC upgrade coordinator.
2 - In theory results won't count towards USAC upgrades. However I think this is actually at the discretion of individual upgrade coordinators. I would not be surprised if some upgrade coordinators did accept it. You could check beforehand with the upgrade coordinator for your area. Heck, @DieterDrake is, or was, a USAC upgrade coordinator.
#14
Senior Member
i'll probably be there, assuming it doesn't conflict with any other New England events. sure it's pricy but it's a good event and honestly I think we're spoiled by the production quality/registration fee we get at some events.
#15
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,918
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 880 Post(s)
Liked 541 Times
in
237 Posts
IMO, it's well balanced and can play out in a number of ways. It is true there are a lot of punchy climbs, but there is also a lot of false flat downhill coming into a final 1k kicker that's with like 3k to go. You can check out the preview ride in the spring if you're so inclined, or I'm sure you can snag a cue sheet from the site and ride it solo over the winter.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1 - Battenkill is not a climber's race. It's a hard man's race, a power course. The longest climb is 5-6 minutes.
2 - In theory results won't count towards USAC upgrades. However I think this is actually at the discretion of individual upgrade coordinators. I would not be surprised if some upgrade coordinators did accept it. You could check beforehand with the upgrade coordinator for your area. Heck, @DieterDrake is, or was, a USAC upgrade coordinator.
2 - In theory results won't count towards USAC upgrades. However I think this is actually at the discretion of individual upgrade coordinators. I would not be surprised if some upgrade coordinators did accept it. You could check beforehand with the upgrade coordinator for your area. Heck, @DieterDrake is, or was, a USAC upgrade coordinator.
Ultimately, I don't think it will matter as "upgrades" and the points system will become a thing of the past soon as an exclusive feature of USAC's.
I am the upgrade coordinator for the Albany area under NYSBRA, currently, but I've voluntarily offered to step down at the end of December as I think it'd be a conflict of interest.
#17
out walking the earth
#21
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
Please note that only races permitted by USA Cycling will count for upgrading purposes.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 789
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#24
**** that
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CALI
Posts: 15,402
Mentioned: 151 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1099 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times
in
30 Posts
How else could it be? Otherwise you'd have people saying "oh yeah I won a bunch of races last year, cat 1 pls kthxbai".
Literally, someone would say that!
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 789
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Saying "USAC only" does not mean saying "any race". For instance, OBRA land; there are, horror of horrors, other sanctioning organizations. There are even different countries! And, do we not trust our regional upgrade coordinators?
Lastly, cat 2 -> cat 1 might well be more stringent than cat 4 -> cat 3. There is no reason why repeated success at cat-4 level races outside of USAC jurisdictions shouldn't be considered for upgrades to USAC cat 3.
We all know the real reason for this policy is to strong-arm race promoters into making their race a USAC race, especially in this time of the birthing of a USAC competitor.
Lastly, cat 2 -> cat 1 might well be more stringent than cat 4 -> cat 3. There is no reason why repeated success at cat-4 level races outside of USAC jurisdictions shouldn't be considered for upgrades to USAC cat 3.
We all know the real reason for this policy is to strong-arm race promoters into making their race a USAC race, especially in this time of the birthing of a USAC competitor.