Aero thoughts
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,438
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3354 Post(s)
Liked 366 Times
in
248 Posts
I believe the Modolo predated the Delta. The TriRig is different mechanics. TriRig pulls a wedge that splits the arms on bearing rollers while Delta's have a parallelogram they move. I have some - think I'll go get them and maybe use them.
#103
Senior Member
Adjusting Roller-cam Bicycle Brakes
I had them on my "pepto bismal" pink Cannondale mtb. I really liked those brakes although they were heavy as heck.
__________________
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
"...during the Lance years, being fit became the No. 1 thing. Totally the only thing. It’s a big part of what we do, but fitness is not the only thing. There’s skills, there’s tactics … there’s all kinds of stuff..." Tim Johnson
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,438
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3354 Post(s)
Liked 366 Times
in
248 Posts
These are not the bars and these are not the brake levers. But I was playing with the fit/feel.
I think I have something here. I may get track bars for this. Sprinter shifters go on the Garmin mount that extends 4 cm.
BrakesHidden.jpg
I think I have something here. I may get track bars for this. Sprinter shifters go on the Garmin mount that extends 4 cm.
BrakesHidden.jpg
#108
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
inability to emergency stop, excessive ability to spear your leg in the event of a crash.
they won't let you ride without bar-ends, how could they allow this.
also, all the other kids would point and laugh and it's just not worth it.
a better way to accomplish the same thing (and you still should not do this) would be to get some single-pivot brake-only levers and mount them right near the stem faceplate, then put the IAB arms on top of them, effectively removing them from the aero profile. they won't spear you, you could emergency stop if you had to, and it would be so, so much less offensive.
they won't let you ride without bar-ends, how could they allow this.
also, all the other kids would point and laugh and it's just not worth it.
a better way to accomplish the same thing (and you still should not do this) would be to get some single-pivot brake-only levers and mount them right near the stem faceplate, then put the IAB arms on top of them, effectively removing them from the aero profile. they won't spear you, you could emergency stop if you had to, and it would be so, so much less offensive.
#109
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,541
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1843 Post(s)
Liked 662 Times
in
416 Posts
I thought you planned to put them behind the tops of the bars - i.e. backward from how they are supposed to be set up, so that the bar provides some aero protection, and at least would give a second point of contact for IAB. I really see no value in what you now propose.
#110
Senior Member
Darn Doge, collegiate rules are made so that people like me don't have to worry about equipment too much and here you are talking about chopped handlebars and inverted brakes and whatnot.
#112
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,906
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 873 Post(s)
Liked 523 Times
in
226 Posts
Should mount shimano grip shifters right by the stem so he can rest his forearms on em and shift without having to break form.
#113
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,438
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3354 Post(s)
Liked 366 Times
in
248 Posts
I often liked the idea of the same bike for all events. Taking a TT bike, or for college even a Tri Bike (no seat stays required, no 3:1) and putting road bars on a huge advantage. Many of the college kids have Tri bikes.
#114
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,438
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3354 Post(s)
Liked 366 Times
in
248 Posts
....
a better way to accomplish the same thing (and you still should not do this) would be to get some single-pivot brake-only levers and mount them right near the stem faceplate, then put the IAB arms on top of them, effectively removing them from the aero profile. they won't spear you, you could emergency stop if you had to, and it would be so, so much less offensive.
a better way to accomplish the same thing (and you still should not do this) would be to get some single-pivot brake-only levers and mount them right near the stem faceplate, then put the IAB arms on top of them, effectively removing them from the aero profile. they won't spear you, you could emergency stop if you had to, and it would be so, so much less offensive.
Also putting sprint shifter buttons on/near top.
In the end - might just do the sprint shifter buttons and leave everything else as is, but that costs me a Di2 brake lever set.
Part of this is economics/not wanting to move parts as I don't want to buy more 9000 Di2 (brakes), but already have the FELT DA2 wired and mostly setup. His Venge and MASI (borrowed some parts, bought others) are also setup. So right now got almost 4 bike (EVO has SRAM Red) and trying to reconcile them. If we could get to one bike (Venge or Felt) that would be 1st choice and save the MASI for home visits and climbing. The EVO is a loaner.
Edit Add:
Also the Aero bars won't allow these brake levers on the tops - or I can't find any without round clamps. So it would be round bars. Not sure that matters. Just a consideration.
Last edited by Doge; 11-06-16 at 12:46 PM.
#115
Senior Member
I was thinking that too. They could goto a UCI bike - much easier and more defined.
I often liked the idea of the same bike for all events. Taking a TT bike, or for college even a Tri Bike (no seat stays required, no 3:1) and putting road bars on a huge advantage. Many of the college kids have Tri bikes.
I often liked the idea of the same bike for all events. Taking a TT bike, or for college even a Tri Bike (no seat stays required, no 3:1) and putting road bars on a huge advantage. Many of the college kids have Tri bikes.
One think I really like about collegiate is that TTTs are a fairly common thing. Don't think I'd get a chance to do one of those around here otherwise.
#116
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
What race is this for? Browsing the pics on USAC from last year's collegiate nat's, it seems most in the TT are riding normal bikes without any "creative" tweaks.
https://www.usacycling.org/usacgalle...pionships-2016
https://www.usacycling.org/usacgalle...pionships-2016
#117
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,438
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3354 Post(s)
Liked 366 Times
in
248 Posts
What race is this for? Browsing the pics on USAC from last year's collegiate nat's, it seems most in the TT are riding normal bikes without any "creative" tweaks.
https://www.usacycling.org/usacgalle...pionships-2016
https://www.usacycling.org/usacgalle...pionships-2016
The USAC rules were revised this year (of course). The rules are simple:
"6F1. Bicycles and Wheels used in competition in all collegiate road events (criteriums, time trials, road races, etc) must use mass-start bicycles as defined in 1I1(g). These bicycles must have at least 16 spokes and no wheel covers may be used."
1I1(g) is not a UCI bike. It allows for bunches of stuff UCI does not. I think they should just make it a UCI mass start bike - but they didn't. A serious Tri Bike would be a huge advantage IMO - even over my trickery.
Things on the website conflict with the rule book. I sent and asked detailed questions to USAC got this response:
"No the rule book is the final verdict, because of how dense our website is in terms of historical pages we can’t always update each one, so the rule book is the final word in what is allowed...."
Years ago when junior was 8 I got into a long discussion with the USAC technical director about a "standard bike" vs the freedom to tinker and make it mostly engine, but some machine. At that time we both agreed tinkering is part of cycling. Since then others in that job went more rules on a standard for younger ages. So no high profile wheels, no carbon, no TT bike etc. (I am not up on them now - for obvious reasons). The thought is/was to make the cost of entry less. I can see where that needs to be applied to college too - esp where many of the kids can barely afford things and mom and dad and sponsors are not paying the bills.
Then...USAFA is a low ranking Div II team. USAFA does not allow them outside sponsors like other colleges. And the riders are not that strong or experienced. They are not threat to the big cycling schools. So shaking things up a bit might be fun. I'll be curious to see what others are using / doing.
Last edited by Doge; 11-06-16 at 01:05 PM.
#118
Senior Member
FYI, Div I and Div II are no longer a thing in collegiate cycling. It's club/varsity now. With all the time you spend dissecting the rule book i am literally shocked you don't know that.
#120
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
this is one area where you should just let your kid compete like a normal collegiate rider and **** around with everything, imo.
#122
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,438
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3354 Post(s)
Liked 366 Times
in
248 Posts
If someone shows up on a Tri bike -

#123
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Show up with the venge and aero (zipp? aerofly?) bars w/Di2. That's a reasonable middle ground between tinkering and being on a standard bike.
#124
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm fairly certain that other college kids would take him out of the back of a break just to f*** with him if he showed up with that. I probably would.
My teammate obliterated both the D1 TT and crit last year, lapping the crit field solo after dispensing with her partner in the break. On a bike she bought herself, on borrowed race wheels.
Collegiate racing is not supposed to be about how much money mommy or daddy can throw at you.
My teammate obliterated both the D1 TT and crit last year, lapping the crit field solo after dispensing with her partner in the break. On a bike she bought herself, on borrowed race wheels.
Collegiate racing is not supposed to be about how much money mommy or daddy can throw at you.
#125
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 10,438
Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3354 Post(s)
Liked 366 Times
in
248 Posts
The best collegiate guys [I know] are winning Cat 1, UCI Worlds podium kids riding the best stuff available. I don't think it is relevant who funds it, but it isn't the kids.