Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

TT dudes: 53, 54 or 55?

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

TT dudes: 53, 54 or 55?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-07, 03:57 AM
  #1  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
TT dudes: 53, 54 or 55?

Right, I know, you're reading the title thinking that old fart Pcad wants to know your racing age.

Incorrect.

Your big chainring tooth count. I have ordered a 55. In training for TT's it seems to me the difference between a 55 and a 53 is only on click of the rear derailleur, but more speed on the descents, which did strike me as a key factor in going fast on rolling TT courses. I considered a 54T, but that seemed rather pointless, so I opted for the Big Mama 55.
patentcad is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 05:33 AM
  #2  
Texas Fight!
 
UT_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Unless you're regularly spinning out, stick with the 53 for now. Maybe eventually a larger chainring to run a straighter chain, but no need to rush into it.
__________________
T E X A S F I G H T !
https://www.chriscollins.org
UT_Dude is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 06:35 AM
  #3  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Yeah, bigger rings are for bigger power. A 53x11 will get you 38.7mph at 100rpm and 53.1mph at 130rpm.

How long are you going to be going over 40 in a race? Personally, I'd be able to put out good TT power anywhere south of 130rpm for an extended period.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 07:06 AM
  #4  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times in 371 Posts
53x11 is 39 mph at 100 rpm. Unless the course has really steep prolonged downhills, I doubt you'll be spinning that out.

A short downhill above 40mph probably better to catch your breath for a seocnd.

Conversely, with the bigger front chainring, you may find yourself going to the small ring on climbs more often which is a bit of a hassel.

Our TT's down here are pretty flat, but I rarely find myself inanything bigger than 53x14
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 07:28 AM
  #5  
old & slow
 
Snap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fleming Island, FL
Posts: 271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I rode a friends TT bike yesterday with a 54 chainring and 180 crankarms. I felt like my cadence was way to low for the whole ride. I think I'm going to run a 53 with 175s. I haven't had a problem spinning out with a 53-12.
+1 to Merlin. TTs here are flat.

Andy
Snap is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 07:55 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You should choose the size of your front chainring based on what gear of your cassette it puts you in while hammering on the flats. The idea is to have as straight of a chainline as possible to reduce friction. If you have a 53 and you find yourself always riding in your 13-12-11, then it's time for a bigger chainring. If you have a 55 and you're always riding in your 21-19, then you need a smaller chainring.

Also take into consideration that different size chainrings will slightly affect your cadence because the gear-inches don't line up perfectly. If you like to TT at a specific cadence, you might want to keep this in mind.
cheezhead is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 08:40 AM
  #7  
Quarq shill
 
cslone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,962

Bikes: 08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I switched froma 53 to a 55 for a few weeks. I switched back because I could never get comfortable with that gearing for some reason. The cadence always seemed too high or too low.
cslone is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 09:20 AM
  #8  
Slow'n'Aero
 
DrWJODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Driving the pace in the crosswind
Posts: 2,599
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Knowing what PCad is talking about, I am using one of two setups (with the first more likely): 54x39 with a 11-25 DA cassette, or a 54x39 with a the 11-26 SRAM.

I use the 54 in all of my racing (it is on the SRM crankset) and I like it because it gives me just a wee bit more top end, but I don't have to change the derailleur setup, nor do I have to go with the 42 for the small (54/39 shifts just fine...at least with Ultegra and Dura Ace FD). I am thinking 55 would cause you to have to be in the be big ring only, or need the 42 inner ring. Using the bigger range of cassette you will be able to handle both climbs and descents, say if you were to do a TT like, oh, say silvermine.
DrWJODonnell is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 11:27 AM
  #9  
Not obese just overweight
 
ratebeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 2,035

Bikes: Trek 7500fx, Cervelo Soloist

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1 The mechanical efficiency drops as your rear gear gets small (by a whopping 2+%)
2 Larger rings mitigate the need for these smaller rear gears

1 Although best performances are often at high cadence, oxygen efficiency may be better at 74 rpm
2 So it might be very beneficial to be nowhere near spinning out when you're at your race's most critical junctures

The amazing brains of Joe Tucker say: pcad did the right thing
__________________
Joe

Veho difficilis, ago facilis
ratebeer is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 11:30 AM
  #10  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Thank you, my confusion is complete. No matter. Pcad's slowness will defy any pathetic attempts on his part regardless, but the hand-wringing on BF is well worth it.
patentcad is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 12:46 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
roadwarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664

Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I hate to break it to you....

but a friend of mine's sister in law rides a 56 FSA tt ring on her tt bike.

Seriously.
roadwarrior is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 12:47 PM
  #12  
Cat WTF
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,296
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just went from a 53 to 54 for no good reason except that I got rid of an 11-21 cassette and am now using a 12-23.


Like that made sense.
cat4ever is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 01:05 PM
  #13  
Texas Fight!
 
UT_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
Thank you, my confusion is complete. No matter. Pcad's slowness will defy any pathetic attempts on his part regardless, but the hand-wringing on BF is well worth it.
I shall sum it up for you. You don't need one. Save your $$$$. Better yet, give your $$$$ saved to me, and i'll make you faster.
__________________
T E X A S F I G H T !
https://www.chriscollins.org
UT_Dude is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 01:11 PM
  #14  
Mmmmm Donuts!
 
FatguyRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Crownsville, MD
Posts: 2,069

Bikes: 1998 IF Crown Jewel

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Why don't we all be honest and just say we like/use the 54 & 55t rings cause thats what the pros do.
Who doenst think that big pie plate chain ring with a 11-21 corncob out back on a TT rig looks cool?
__________________
John

'09 Cannondale CAAD9 - Team Latitude/ABRT Special.
'04 Lemond Victorie Ti
'98 IF Crown Jewel (dead)
'92 Trek2100 (TT)
'50 something Gino Bartali (fixer)
'02 Ducati ST4s (Moto-Ref mount)

My Blog
FatguyRacer is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 01:48 PM
  #15  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
I rode that Silivermine course and the descents were long and pretty ballistic. The 55 made sense to me. But that might mean do the opposite. I'll pay for the 55 and hang it in the garage as a reminder of my stupidity. Which is not particularly necessary, but helpful nonetheless. Hopefully Dr. W. is in a charitable mood on the 16th and will sign an autograph for me. I'll tell him it's for my daughter who's a big fan.
patentcad is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 02:52 PM
  #16  
Slow'n'Aero
 
DrWJODonnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Driving the pace in the crosswind
Posts: 2,599
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Get Mike G's hancock. He is the one who will slaughter us all. If you want, buy me the FSA 56 Carbon TT ring and I will use it at silvermine. Then I can tell you whether you should have used it or not.
DrWJODonnell is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 08:24 PM
  #17  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Mikey G. is my peloton pal (he's the nicest guy in the world, great dude), I can get his autograph any time. On the other hand Dr. W. is sort of like Howard Hughes, a mystery man whose exploits I only hear about through BF, even though I spend many weekends chasing his team mates @ 30mph. It will be big fun to meet you there WJ. I know what your bicycle looks like. Look for my Cdale.

I hope to get at least one more ride in on the Silvermine course before that race on my Zippified Slice. I actually have yet to ride that Slice with the Zipps. That should be faster.
patentcad is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 08:58 PM
  #18  
Mitcholo
 
CrimsonKarter21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oost Vlaanderen in mind, Cleveland in body
Posts: 8,850

Bikes: 2010 Mitcholo w/ Sram Force/Red

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kind of a seperate question, but; what about foot speed?. I like 165's on the track, and I'm not a super-powerful mashing-type rider (yet), and I like high cadence as well as moving my feet fast. Does anyone think it could hamper (already slow) sprinting speed?
CrimsonKarter21 is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 09:13 PM
  #19  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Chris Walken for President? I like that.



I would never refer to Mr. Walken as a Fred. Now that man is badass. I take him in the Chuck Norris vs. C. Walken WWF Slamdown on Pay Per View.
patentcad is offline  
Old 08-24-07, 09:33 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Athens, Ohio
Posts: 5,104

Bikes: Custom Custom Custom

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I know a guy that used a 60t ring
nitropowered is offline  
Old 08-25-07, 02:29 AM
  #21  
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
 
patentcad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chester, NY
Posts: 90,508

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1142 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by nitropowered
I know a guy that used a 60t ring
I think that was Christopher Walken.
patentcad is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.