Just started training with Power? Post your questions/comments here!
#2402
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ChapelBorro NC
Posts: 4,126
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a Garmin 705 head unit, so I can either go with 1s recording or "SMART" recording (variable time interval). I think SMART may make some programs have a glitch, but if anyone has positive experience with it, I'm all ears. I can probably address the swings by data filtering in the analysis programs.
I can display 3s or 30s rolling averages, so in terms of doing stuff on the bike, I'll just rely on that.
I can display 3s or 30s rolling averages, so in terms of doing stuff on the bike, I'll just rely on that.
Another question for PT/705 users: I get power readings sometimes that are ridiculously high, like 3000W while I'm waiting at a light, or when I get near my front door. Am I picking up some kind of interference? Is there a fix for this?
Sorry if these questions have been answered, I haven't had the time to go through this whole thread yet. Thanks.
Last edited by rankin116; 07-28-10 at 06:27 AM.
#2403
My idea of fun
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920
Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times
in
36 Posts
about damned time.
(edited: those are grape nehi's for you, you're too young for beer)
#2406
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ChapelBorro NC
Posts: 4,126
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Again, sorry if this has come up, I started reading this thread from the beginning, but I'm only about 10 pages in.
Last edited by rankin116; 07-28-10 at 04:15 PM.
#2407
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
So I got a look at my ride from today using PowerAgent, and I have three points with outrageous power numbers, like 31,000W. These are clearly messing up averages and such. Are these readings a common problem? Is there some way to remove them from the data, as they are obviously not valid.
#2408
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 910
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That was it, thanks.
So I got a look at my ride from today using PowerAgent, and I have three points with outrageous power numbers, like 31,000W. These are clearly messing up averages and such. Are these readings a common problem? Is there some way to remove them from the data, as they are obviously not valid.
Again, sorry if this has come up, I started reading this thread from the beginning, but I'm only about 10 pages in.
So I got a look at my ride from today using PowerAgent, and I have three points with outrageous power numbers, like 31,000W. These are clearly messing up averages and such. Are these readings a common problem? Is there some way to remove them from the data, as they are obviously not valid.
Again, sorry if this has come up, I started reading this thread from the beginning, but I'm only about 10 pages in.
You could export it to CSV, delete the ride from Power Agent, fix the lines using Excel or similar and reimport back into Power Agent.
#2409
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ChapelBorro NC
Posts: 4,126
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's a great idea, thanks. I'll see what that looks like. I'm definitely sending Saris and email in the morning though to see what's up.
#2410
Senior Member
Can someone provide me with a guideline as to what different LTS (long term stress, idk what it is referred to as in wko) mean in terms of severity? What is a "high" LTS and what is a "low" LTS and at what LTS is best for performance. If there is an article out there somewhere you can just link to it. Sorry if this has been covered earlier in this thread.
#2411
Writin' stuff
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 3,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
4 Posts
The number that equates to your best form will differ from person to person. I tend to race best at 110-120. That's where I was in late May/early June when I was flying - FTP over 5.0w/kg and busting shorter records left and right. Others do well in the 80-90 range or even lower.
Now I'm down to 87, on purpose. FTP is down about 20w and I'm certainly breaking no records, but I needed to let it come down so I can build back up again for the Fort Collins USGP. Riding a super high LTS is great for a while, but if you don't let it come down you can't build again.
Your LTS won't be accurate until you've been tracking it for 42 days, by the way.
Now I'm down to 87, on purpose. FTP is down about 20w and I'm certainly breaking no records, but I needed to let it come down so I can build back up again for the Fort Collins USGP. Riding a super high LTS is great for a while, but if you don't let it come down you can't build again.
Your LTS won't be accurate until you've been tracking it for 42 days, by the way.
#2412
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Can someone provide me with a guideline as to what different LTS (long term stress, idk what it is referred to as in wko) mean in terms of severity? What is a "high" LTS and what is a "low" LTS and at what LTS is best for performance. If there is an article out there somewhere you can just link to it. Sorry if this has been covered earlier in this thread.
I see the weekly TSS umd and kensuf talk about and it is like 1.5-2x what I am able to work with on a weekly basis. I'm still seeing beginner's improvement though, so I won't yet worry about it. FWIW, I started using the ptap about 60 days ago and the LTS has been steadily rising. I guessed with a "50" LTS to start with (not really having anything to compare with) and my LTS seems headed to steady out at 90-100.
#2413
Senior Member
The number that equates to your best form will differ from person to person. I tend to race best at 110-120. That's where I was in late May/early June when I was flying - FTP over 5.0w/kg and busting shorter records left and right. Others do well in the 80-90 range or even lower.
Now I'm down to 87, on purpose. FTP is down about 20w and I'm certainly breaking no records, but I needed to let it come down so I can build back up again for the Fort Collins USGP. Riding a super high LTS is great for a while, but if you don't let it come down you can't build again.
Your LTS won't be accurate until you've been tracking it for 42 days, by the way.
Now I'm down to 87, on purpose. FTP is down about 20w and I'm certainly breaking no records, but I needed to let it come down so I can build back up again for the Fort Collins USGP. Riding a super high LTS is great for a while, but if you don't let it come down you can't build again.
Your LTS won't be accurate until you've been tracking it for 42 days, by the way.
I'm at 68 LTS right now and I feel completely burnt out, that seems really low though. And I just got to the part of the Training Bible where Friel talks about having a positive SB going into an A race. My SB is -30. Even after my rest week a few weeks ago it only got up to -10.
The reason I'm asking this is because my last A race of the season is this coming Saturday and I've been feeling really fatigued and I want to try and go into this race with somewhat decent form.
#2414
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Aren't all those metrics (CTL, ATL, TSS and their equivalents) all based on a (reasonably) accurate FTP? If you only did your field test a couple days ago I would think that any data prior to that is suspect.
#2415
Senior Member
I set all my data prior to my test to use my current ftp. How fast does one's ftp usually change.
#2416
grilled cheesus
TrainingPeaks just added some key WKO produced data to their online premium accounts. Almost no reason to have a desktop software now. well, except for the fact that i paid for it and do have it.
New TP Info
I only pass this along as I am a big fan of their online account. It is an excellent do it all training log. Later.
New TP Info
I only pass this along as I am a big fan of their online account. It is an excellent do it all training log. Later.
__________________
#2417
Senior Member
Another question (sorry for question bombing this thread, but that's what it is for): It seems on bf, everyone bases their workouts off of FTP. But in Friel's book he seems much more concerned with LT. What is the relationship between LT and FTP? Are they the same?
#2418
My idea of fun
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920
Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times
in
36 Posts
Thanks ze. I have had the pm for about a month and I backlogged a bunch of ride before that, so is it safe to assume that the values are at least a close approximation?
I'm at 68 LTS right now and I feel completely burnt out, that seems really low though. And I just got to the part of the Training Bible where Friel talks about having a positive SB going into an A race. My SB is -30. Even after my rest week a few weeks ago it only got up to -10.
The reason I'm asking this is because my last A race of the season is this coming Saturday and I've been feeling really fatigued and I want to try and go into this race with somewhat decent form.
I'm at 68 LTS right now and I feel completely burnt out, that seems really low though. And I just got to the part of the Training Bible where Friel talks about having a positive SB going into an A race. My SB is -30. Even after my rest week a few weeks ago it only got up to -10.
The reason I'm asking this is because my last A race of the season is this coming Saturday and I've been feeling really fatigued and I want to try and go into this race with somewhat decent form.
The key to getting out of the gutter is rest, period, plain and simple.
REST IS WHAT MAKES YOU STRONGER
You need to rest and recover to get stronger. That's all there is to it. I really try to avoid taking more than 2 days off the bike because my legs will block up, but if I'm 2 weeks out from an A event then I'll go ahead and take that 3-4 day rest immediately, and then ride enough to keep the legs from being blocked, but not so hard to cause more fatigue.
Looking over the training thread, you had a hard group ride yesterday (7/28), a 20' test on 7/27, and I'm not sure if it was 7/24 or 7/17 where you did a 180 mile weekend. Considering this was supposed to be the week of an A race, you've gone too hard bucky.
Here's what I probably would have done if this was MY A race: I would have taken most of last week off, then this week I would have done 90 minutes on Tuesday with mixed (balls hard, balls easy) to unblock the legs. I would have gone SUPER easy on Wednesday, I mean so damned easy my butt would hurt. And I would do nothing more than light endurance today. And tomorrow I would do openers, and Saturday I would have raced.
You need to rest harder than you train, period.
Last edited by kensuf; 07-29-10 at 12:47 PM. Reason: casting pearls before swing..
#2420
Senior Member
Thank you kensuf. I know I come off as an annoying little kid, but I really appreciate your advice and your very detailed explanation, which I just copy and pasted into my training log.
Fortunately, for me, my A race is next Sunday (I thought it was a Saturday, but I was wrong) 8/8. Here is what I'm planning on doing - Today through Saturday off. Sunday and Monday light endurance. Tuesday off. Wednesday 90 minutes (balls hard balls easy as you described), recovery ride thursday, light endurance friday, openers saturday. More or less exactly what you wrote, just shifted back a day to account for the race being on Sunday. I'm going to keep my eye on my TSB and hope it goes positive.
Thanks again!
Fortunately, for me, my A race is next Sunday (I thought it was a Saturday, but I was wrong) 8/8. Here is what I'm planning on doing - Today through Saturday off. Sunday and Monday light endurance. Tuesday off. Wednesday 90 minutes (balls hard balls easy as you described), recovery ride thursday, light endurance friday, openers saturday. More or less exactly what you wrote, just shifted back a day to account for the race being on Sunday. I'm going to keep my eye on my TSB and hope it goes positive.
Thanks again!
#2421
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Mikey, there is a TSS estimator spreadsheet floating around, where you can basically put in your planned workouts (in terms of TSS) and it will show you what your CTL, ATL, and TSB will be into the future, so you can use it to plan out how much TSS to run on each day and arrive at the desired TSB on race day. May be handy to take a look at, but also not sure you really have enough history to make proper use out of it.
#2422
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I see the weekly TSS umd and kensuf talk about and it is like 1.5-2x what I am able to work with on a weekly basis. I'm still seeing beginner's improvement though, so I won't yet worry about it. FWIW, I started using the ptap about 60 days ago and the LTS has been steadily rising. I guessed with a "50" LTS to start with (not really having anything to compare with) and my LTS seems headed to steady out at 90-100.
#2424
Writin' stuff
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 3,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
4 Posts
Fortunately, for me, my A race is next Sunday (I thought it was a Saturday, but I was wrong) 8/8. Here is what I'm planning on doing - Today through Saturday off. Sunday and Monday light endurance. Tuesday off. Wednesday 90 minutes (balls hard balls easy as you described), recovery ride thursday, light endurance friday, openers saturday. More or less exactly what you wrote, just shifted back a day to account for the race being on Sunday. I'm going to keep my eye on my TSB and hope it goes positive.
Thanks again!
Thanks again!
Keep riding through this weekend. Since you're obviously overreached, cut whatever you were planning half. But definitely get on your bike.
Then, next week, follow any of the dozens of of taper-week programs that are floating around here. They're all equally likely to work for you. Until you experiment with tapers, you'll have no idea what really works anyway.
If you're SB is only ever getting to -10, you aren't resting. You're floating along on a crappy plateau. Just because guys here do rest weeks with a bunch of riding doesn't mean YOU should - they are running LTS's nearly double yours, which means one of your regular weeks is a 50% week for them. You need to be really taking time OFF, or doing rides so short and easy they barely register any bike score at all.
#2425
Senior Member
Kensuf says to take days off, ze says not to. I'm going to compromise and take the next two days completely off the bike. THen I'll make sure to ride through the weekend and next week, with varying levels of intensity similar to what kensuf listed above.