Just started training with Power? Post your questions/comments here!
#2876
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I guess I'm thinking about it too much. Must be the rain here in SoCal but from Thursday on it should be sunny again so I dont have to touch the damn trainer again and can finish my base. Until then (end of January) I dont even want to worry about intervals. That being said, not sure why are you suggesting targeting 300W since I just did 20min at 298W just warming up. My FTP target for next year is at least 370W since my current FTP is somewhere between 330-350W.
#2877
fuggitivo solitario
I guess I'm thinking about it too much. Must be the rain here in SoCal but from Thursday on it should be sunny again so I dont have to touch the damn trainer again and can finish my base. Until then (end of January) I dont even want to worry about intervals. That being said, not sure why are you suggesting targeting 300W since I just did 20min at 298W just warming up. My FTP target for next year is at least 370W since my current FTP is somewhere between 330-350W.
#2878
Senior Member
I guess I'm thinking about it too much. Must be the rain here in SoCal but from Thursday on it should be sunny again so I dont have to touch the damn trainer again and can finish my base. Until then (end of January) I dont even want to worry about intervals. That being said, not sure why are you suggesting targeting 300W since I just did 20min at 298W just warming up. My FTP target for next year is at least 370W since my current FTP is somewhere between 330-350W.
#2879
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: chicago,Il
Posts: 2,401
Bikes: yes please
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Question: I have a wired PT (SL)...can this be converted to a wireless device? Or is the antenna located inside the hub?
I have already emailed Saris, but have not heard back from them.
I have already emailed Saris, but have not heard back from them.
#2880
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This year I was racing as a Cat 5 and did just enough (12) races to race next year as a Cat 4. But no worries, I'm O.F.S (old.fat.slow at 37 6'5 192lb) so those numbers are not that great. BTW I just started with cycling 3 years ago because I was too fat (January 2008 I was 245lb) and needed some exercise.
#2881
My idea of fun
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920
Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times
in
36 Posts
Those numbers really aren't that bad, even at 192#. A lot of guys would give a testicle to have an ftp of 3.4/3.5 w/kg.
#2882
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tampa
Posts: 518
Bikes: Schwinn Paramount, Trek MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just tried this for the first time. Imported raw FIT file from the Garmin. Worked fine. Then went back and did the usual upload into Garmin Training Center, export file as TCX, then upload into Golden Cheetah. The GCX file gave me an average power of 208 for my ride today (compared to 202 for the FIT file), and a BikeScore of 95 (compared to 89 for the FIT file). These same differences were observed when I uploaded into my free account on trainingpeaks (via my coach). So it seems the GCX file inflates numbers a bit (and reports more time spent riding whereas trainingpeaks reports same time riding in either FIT or GCX file, which corresponds to time riding on the FIT file in Golden Cheetah). Ugh...I don't know what to believe anymore. My belief system is fried
#2883
My idea of fun
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 9,920
Bikes: '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '02 Kona Lavadome, '07 Giant TCR Advanced, '07 Karate Monkey
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 59 Times
in
36 Posts
Yeah, I've had similar failures in my belief system since discovering my 705 doesn't really record every second of data like it claims to...
#2884
fuggitivo solitario
This year I was racing as a Cat 5 and did just enough (12) races to race next year as a Cat 4. But no worries, I'm O.F.S (old.fat.slow at 37 6'5 192lb) so those numbers are not that great. BTW I just started with cycling 3 years ago because I was too fat (January 2008 I was 245lb) and needed some exercise.
#2885
Bulldozer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's a great accomplishment. Well done. I don't know what you guys have out in SD, here in NYC we have a race series at the site of a former airfield (Floyd Bennett). The course is on the former runways of the field, and as such is pancake flat. To boot, there's a lot of wind, so aero and raw power trump weight here. Sounds like you can use races like that to your advantage & dish out some major pain.
#2886
fuggitivo solitario
Opps, i guess the silver lining here is that he's not in NYC. Besides, we all know that you kick serious ass once the grade of the road goes above 3%. I saw that you are planning to sign up for Battenkill. Aimee did quite well in that race, and I'd think you'll dish out quite a bit of pain, too. As for me, 4000 ft of climbing and dirt roads means i'm much more suited for the role of nonparticipant.
#2887
Bulldozer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yeah, I was able to mostly hang with her in the RR at Green Mountain until the very end, and she's a 3, so hopefully I'll do well in the 4's. My whole team is going so it should be fun regardless.
#2888
Making a kilometer blurry
#2889
fuggitivo solitario
I think my ptap is out of calibration for some reason. When i go to the torque menu, the middle line reads 519. That's a bit too high, right?
The readings were all over the place today. There was a section i know i had to put out at least 270W in order to maintain 22mph, and the ptap read 220W. Grr. What are people's experiences with powertap recalibrating the hub? How long is the turnaround?
The readings were all over the place today. There was a section i know i had to put out at least 270W in order to maintain 22mph, and the ptap read 220W. Grr. What are people's experiences with powertap recalibrating the hub? How long is the turnaround?
#2890
Making a kilometer blurry
Less than two weeks. Depends on how fast you ship out. It's quicker than they'll quote you, in my experience.
I'm not sure on the calibration menu action, but Saris will run through it with you on the phone.
I'm not sure on the calibration menu action, but Saris will run through it with you on the phone.
#2892
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 965
Bikes: 2012 Parlee Z5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just got my powermeter and did a 20 min test today.
Taking 95% of the average power for the 20 min gave me 279 W for my FTP. Using Golden Cheetah the CP, which from what I understand is the programs estimate of FTP, is 287 W. There are only two rides in the software now so I'm reluctant to believe the programs estimation of FTP.
Which number is more reliable? Right now I think I'm going to use the 95% of the 20 min test, but maybe later switch to the CP value that GC gives. It's only a few watts but that changes my FTP from 3.89 to 3.99 W/kg
I think I'm suffering from information overload, but thats a good thing.
Taking 95% of the average power for the 20 min gave me 279 W for my FTP. Using Golden Cheetah the CP, which from what I understand is the programs estimate of FTP, is 287 W. There are only two rides in the software now so I'm reluctant to believe the programs estimation of FTP.
Which number is more reliable? Right now I think I'm going to use the 95% of the 20 min test, but maybe later switch to the CP value that GC gives. It's only a few watts but that changes my FTP from 3.89 to 3.99 W/kg
I think I'm suffering from information overload, but thats a good thing.
Last edited by SalsaPodio; 01-03-11 at 11:23 PM. Reason: wrong number
#2893
fuggitivo solitario
I'd take the 279W.
The critical power is best done from two different tests, one short (<8min) and one long (>20min)
The critical power is best done from two different tests, one short (<8min) and one long (>20min)
#2895
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"Normal" is 512 +/- ~12, although I have an old PT at ~450 that works fine. 519 is within spec.
Do a static torque check. If it's close I wouldn't bother sending it in.
Do a static torque check. If it's close I wouldn't bother sending it in.
I think my ptap is out of calibration for some reason. When i go to the torque menu, the middle line reads 519. That's a bit too high, right?
The readings were all over the place today. There was a section i know i had to put out at least 270W in order to maintain 22mph, and the ptap read 220W. Grr. What are people's experiences with powertap recalibrating the hub? How long is the turnaround?
The readings were all over the place today. There was a section i know i had to put out at least 270W in order to maintain 22mph, and the ptap read 220W. Grr. What are people's experiences with powertap recalibrating the hub? How long is the turnaround?
#2896
fuggitivo solitario
i don't know if you have the Coogan book or have been to the "seven deadly sins" website, but it may be worth checking out. They usually recommend doing the two points of the test within a short period of time. OTOH, i'm planning to stack my 5' and 20' together (to take into account of fatigue for race day FTP), and i'd think that the data probably won't be as accurate for the critical power.
#2898
fuggitivo solitario
it's certainly possible. For now i'm just gonna chalk it up to a freak incidence. Got off the phone w/ the powertap people, and they said 520 should be fine for now. I'll need to pay $350 to get the thing serviced when the time comes.
Also, for anyone who's curious, you can send the signal from one hub to two receivers. The Saris rep was curious as to why i'd want to do that, to which i replied: because it's cheaper than getting a joule.
Also, for anyone who's curious, you can send the signal from one hub to two receivers. The Saris rep was curious as to why i'd want to do that, to which i replied: because it's cheaper than getting a joule.
#2899
In the top 42%
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 220
Bikes: Salsa CCC
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any idea why I would have a 30-second drop like it shows in TP? That doesn't make any sense to me. I have multiple training sessions and a CX race in there as well. Just learning here (reading as much as I can), and that graph just seems very strange to me.
#2900
Batüwü Creakcreak
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The illadelph
Posts: 20,784
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 228 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
160 Posts
it's certainly possible. For now i'm just gonna chalk it up to a freak incidence. Got off the phone w/ the powertap people, and they said 520 should be fine for now. I'll need to pay $350 to get the thing serviced when the time comes.
Also, for anyone who's curious, you can send the signal from one hub to two receivers. The Saris rep was curious as to why i'd want to do that, to which i replied: because it's cheaper than getting a joule.
Also, for anyone who's curious, you can send the signal from one hub to two receivers. The Saris rep was curious as to why i'd want to do that, to which i replied: because it's cheaper than getting a joule.