Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Into this (wind) Tunnel of Love

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Into this (wind) Tunnel of Love

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-10, 10:22 AM
  #26  
Making a kilometer blurry
 
waterrockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin (near TX)
Posts: 26,170

Bikes: rkwaki's porn collection

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by big john
I hear mtb downhill racers are using the tunnel now.
Only just starting? I would have thought they'd be doing that back in the 90s.

Originally Posted by wanders
"All I wanna do is zoom-a-zoom-zoom-zoom ..."


Great. Now I'm making speed buggy sounds and have spit spots all over my monitor.
waterrockets is offline  
Old 07-02-10, 10:36 AM
  #27  
.
 
botto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 40,375
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Cleave
Kestrel?

Ridley???
bikes are tools, not jewels.
botto is offline  
Old 07-02-10, 11:52 AM
  #28  
Banned.
 
El Diablo Rojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: ATX, Ex So Cal
Posts: 11,058

Bikes: Ridley Noah-Scott Addict-Orbea Ordu

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by botto
bikes are tools, not jewels.
They can be both.
El Diablo Rojo is offline  
Old 07-02-10, 05:28 PM
  #29  
Does Not Exist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Voltairia
Posts: 2,094
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by waterrockets
Only just starting? I would have thought they'd be doing that back in the 90s.
Downhill mountain bikers are so far behind in understanding the importance of aerodynamics that they create a controversy over skinsuits. There was a big dust up between Rachel Atherton and Tracy Moseley that likely contributed to the UCI banning skinsuits for downhill.

https://www.bikeradar.com/racing/arti...mens-dh-18277/

https://www.bikeradar.com/news/articl...petition-19021

I'm waiting for the time when downhillers fully embrace aerodynamics. Hed can start building deep section downhill wheels again, skinsuits will be the norm, and positions will probably be narrower.
efficiency is offline  
Old 07-02-10, 06:33 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Quel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,653
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Curious. If something as small as a playdough fairing around the bb-brake made enough of a difference to clean up the wind off the front wheel, how do they account for the two rods holding up the front wheel? Wouldn't the wind coming off those affect some wheels differently than others in a way that may not be the same on the open road? That seems minor, but obviously the point of the wind tunnel is adding up lots of minor changes. Comes down to what you said that you can't find the "best", but just wondering if they do anything about that.
Quel is offline  
Old 07-02-10, 06:38 PM
  #31  
Resident Alien
Thread Starter
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Quel
Curious. If something as small as a playdough fairing around the bb-brake made enough of a difference to clean up the wind off the front wheel, how do they account for the two rods holding up the front wheel? Wouldn't the wind coming off those affect some wheels differently than others in a way that may not be the same on the open road? That seems minor, but obviously the point of the wind tunnel is adding up lots of minor changes. Comes down to what you said that you can't find the "best", but just wondering if they do anything about that.
The supports are far enough from the bike that they don't interact. The front wheel in question is directly inline and close to the BB fairing.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 07-02-10, 06:50 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,163
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by efficiency
Downhill mountain bikers are so far behind in understanding the importance of aerodynamics that they create a controversy over skinsuits. There was a big dust up between Rachel Atherton and Tracy Moseley that likely contributed to the UCI banning skinsuits for downhill.

https://www.bikeradar.com/racing/arti...mens-dh-18277/

https://www.bikeradar.com/news/articl...petition-19021
Thanks for the links. I was watching one of the World cup downhill races on TV just last week and couldn't understand why they were wearing large flapping clothing...
Dalai is offline  
Old 07-02-10, 07:12 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,163
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by MDcatV
what is the equipment baseline before going into the tunnel?

for instance, if i go out and by a tt bike and whatever bars/extensions/helmet, etc. look cool to me, slap on my wheels that i already own, i assume i get significant return on tunnel investment just in getting the body position maximized?
I went in far less prepared than RacerEx (no field testing) just the bike and position that I thought was decent with the primary focus on position. Of my estimated 43 watt at 40 km/hr saving, only 10 watts was due to changing aero helmets.

Noting at the time my front end was a Vision Tech integrated setup (replaced this year with the UCI approved 3T Mistral Pro bars ) so couldn't change bar width etc. So 33 watts saving was just through 2cm spacer drop, shrugging and turtling...

Initial position



Final position

Dalai is offline  
Old 07-02-10, 10:36 PM
  #34  
Old & Getting Older Racer
 
Cleave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,343

Bikes: Bicycle Transportation: 2022 Hyundai Kona Electric, 2019 Kia Niro Plug-In Hybrid

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by botto
bikes are tools, not jewels.
Yes.

Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
They can be both.
+1

However, what I meant was, "Where did I miss the demise of the Ridley Dean?"
__________________
Thanks.
Cleave
"Real men still wear pink."
Visit my blog at https://cleavesblant.wordpress.com/
Lightning Velo Cycling Club: https://www.lightningvelo.org/
Learn about our Green Dream Home at https://www.lawville.org/
Cleave is offline  
Old 07-03-10, 01:23 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ruidoso, NM
Posts: 1,359
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Pedaleur
How much testing for repeatability did you do? All these numbers all over the place make me think "noise," but obviously the engineers there know a little more about their system than I do.
I analyzed someone's wind tunnel (Texas A&M) data last year and concluded that... nothing could be concluded. The random scatter was >2% and there were not enough runs and repeats to determine anything with confidence.
rruff is offline  
Old 07-03-10, 02:11 PM
  #36  
Resident Alien
Thread Starter
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Cleave
However, what I meant was, "Where did I miss the demise of the Ridley Dean?"
It's still here and was tested along with the Kestrel. Kestrel, set up for me, was better.

Originally Posted by rruff
I analyzed someone's wind tunnel (Texas A&M) data last year and concluded that... nothing could be concluded. The random scatter was >2% and there were not enough runs and repeats to determine anything with confidence.
The bike only runs were nearly identical. With me on the bike our bigger variances were in the 1% range, but mostly below that, and in some cases within a gram or three.

NateL got some of the pictures and commented that my overlay was nearly identical; pretty much what my tunnel guy also said. I've spent so much time on the TT bike that there's a lot of muscle memory there. With a lot of guys they aren't comfortable on the bike in the first place and fidget around a bunch. Tunnel can be pretty sensative to those seemingly small movements.

Last edited by Racer Ex; 07-03-10 at 02:23 PM.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 07-03-10, 03:04 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Quel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,653
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dalai
I went in far less prepared than RacerEx (no field testing) just the bike and position that I thought was decent with the primary focus on position. Of my estimated 43 watt at 40 km/hr saving, only 10 watts was due to changing aero helmets.

Noting at the time my front end was a Vision Tech integrated setup (replaced this year with the UCI approved 3T Mistral Pro bars ) so couldn't change bar width etc. So 33 watts saving was just through 2cm spacer drop, shrugging and turtling...

Initial position

[IMGhttps://farm4.static.flickr.com/3121/2867442788_da6a0ede92_o.jpg[/IMG]

Final position

[IMGhttps://farm4.static.flickr.com/3212/2867443088_ca91aaec8d_o.jpg[/IMG]
How'd you end up at the final position? You are sitting way farther back than most "conventional" TT positions. I was kind of expecting a big move forward from your first picture, but nothing changed there. Just a power/aero tradeoff?
Quel is offline  
Old 07-03-10, 03:37 PM
  #38  
Blast from the Past
 
Voodoo76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Schertz TX
Posts: 3,209

Bikes: Felt FR1, Ridley Excal, CAAD10, Trek 5500, Cannondale Slice

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 222 Post(s)
Liked 66 Times in 43 Posts
Originally Posted by El Diablo Rojo
He's not wearing socks...He's a Tri Guy! Burn him! Burn him!!!
No socks used to be de rigueur on the track.
Voodoo76 is offline  
Old 07-03-10, 03:59 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ruidoso, NM
Posts: 1,359
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
NateL got some of the pictures and commented that my overlay was nearly identical; pretty much what my tunnel guy also said. I've spent so much time on the TT bike that there's a lot of muscle memory there. With a lot of guys they aren't comfortable on the bike in the first place and fidget around a bunch. Tunnel can be pretty sensative to those seemingly small movements.
Ya... it seemed to be body position changes more than anything for the session I looked at. The instrumentation was good. Little things like how you hold your head can be big factors. Really have to keep your position consistent if you want to check for other variables.

What does your CdA work out to?

Last edited by rruff; 07-03-10 at 04:05 PM.
rruff is offline  
Old 07-03-10, 06:47 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,163
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Quel
How'd you end up at the final position? You are sitting way farther back than most "conventional" TT positions. I was kind of expecting a big move forward from your first picture, but nothing changed there. Just a power/aero tradeoff?
Not sure what you mean by conventional TT position? Bike setup just fits within the UCI measures to which all levels of racing here in Australia must abide to - saddle tip the minimum 5cm behind the bottom bracket and the extensions right on maximum 75cm length allowed. It may look a little out of perspective as I'm just over 6 foot riding a 52cm P3?

To be consistent with the runs I am sitting square on the saddle but do drift naturally a little further forward onto the saddle tip when on the rivet. I have only fitted a wired SRM onto the TT bike in the last month, so can't say if there was a loss in power from the drop of spacers after my tunnel session. But my output from the two TT's just raced since fitting the PM is comparable with my road power output so I'm thinking my original position was just very conservative.

What the tunnel does show you is how very minor changes can make big impact to drag. When climbing on the aerobars, I tend to bring my hands further back on the extensions - this is only a minor change but increased my drag by a noticeable margin. So I'm not surprised to make the savings I did in the end mostly by shrugging and turtling. Just a matter of adapting to that position whilst racing...
Dalai is offline  
Old 07-03-10, 07:02 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Nate552's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 2,620

Bikes: Orbea Orca Trek 5500 Trek Equinox

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rruff
I analyzed someone's wind tunnel (Texas A&M) data last year and concluded that... nothing could be concluded. The random scatter was >2% and there were not enough runs and repeats to determine anything with confidence.
I'm sure I can guess whose test you are referring to as I was there helping and prepared the data. And you're right, consistent position was a factor. It was so slight it wasn't noticed until we created picture overlays later. But a baseline run was done towards the end and that confirmed the data was correct. And I do think some things could be determined from the testing. Ideally, you'd do repeat runs for everything, but $$$$ plays a factor
Nate552 is offline  
Old 07-03-10, 09:09 PM
  #42  
Resident Alien
Thread Starter
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rruff
What does your CdA work out to?
I keep certain numbers close to the vest but the improvement was substantial stacked on top of an already good number. I'm confident that going into Nats I've done my due diligence on the aero portion of the equation. Gotta get the motor in tune and the brain focused. I definitely think I have a shot at winning, but I have a lot of respect for some of the guys I'm going up against.

Last edited by Racer Ex; 07-04-10 at 06:45 AM.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 07-04-10, 05:39 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Nate552's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 2,620

Bikes: Orbea Orca Trek 5500 Trek Equinox

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rruff
Really have to keep your position consistent if you want to check for other variables.
Very true. This is critical, and obviously why some companies use dummies in the tunnel to check for small changes (the DZ dummy and Speedplays creepy half dummy come to mind). Looking at Ex's pics, his begin and end positions were incredibly consistent (minus the changes obviously).
Nate552 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gerv
Living Car Free
95
09-23-15 06:54 AM
rhm
Classic & Vintage
62
10-17-12 01:08 PM
Phil85207
Fifty Plus (50+)
7
01-24-12 10:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.