Maintaining power in a headwind
#1
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Maintaining power in a headwind
This is going to sound very strange but I thought I'd risk general ridicule and ask anyway.
On weekdays, I really have one route to ride - it is a loop and I go with the wind on the way out and against the wind on the way back. I have noticed that is MUCH harder to maintain the same power going against the wind.
Take today - my ride was supposed to a tempo ride: 60 min @ 180-200W with some sprints thrown in. On the way over, maintaining 200W was quite easy. Legs felt good, HR nice and low... felt great. On the way back, it was a struggle to even maintain 180W - the RPE felt a lot higher. This wasnt b/c I fried my legs. I got back and had around 10 min left, so I did a shorter loop. Again, with the headwind, even 220W was easy to hold. Turn around and the RPE just went a whole lot higher.
And it isnt just today. I have noticed this over the past month or so. Wtf? Power is power, right - and as long as I am putting out the same power, the perceived effort should be more or less the same. What gives, any idea?
TIA,
V.
On weekdays, I really have one route to ride - it is a loop and I go with the wind on the way out and against the wind on the way back. I have noticed that is MUCH harder to maintain the same power going against the wind.
Take today - my ride was supposed to a tempo ride: 60 min @ 180-200W with some sprints thrown in. On the way over, maintaining 200W was quite easy. Legs felt good, HR nice and low... felt great. On the way back, it was a struggle to even maintain 180W - the RPE felt a lot higher. This wasnt b/c I fried my legs. I got back and had around 10 min left, so I did a shorter loop. Again, with the headwind, even 220W was easy to hold. Turn around and the RPE just went a whole lot higher.
And it isnt just today. I have noticed this over the past month or so. Wtf? Power is power, right - and as long as I am putting out the same power, the perceived effort should be more or less the same. What gives, any idea?
TIA,
V.
#2
Ninja don't wear flipflop
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NE TN
Posts: 1,443
Bikes: Specialized S-Works Roubaix SL3, BMC TM01...if it every ships
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Look at your cadence as well and see if it dropped a lot into the wind. Also, you could just be tired on the way back. Finally, make sure your power meter is zeroed at least 20 minutes into the ride. If you are leaving from a garage or car and zero right before the ride, you will likely see some drift for the first part of the ride.
#3
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Looking at the cadence, this is what happens: I am spinning at 100rpm at what feels like a tempo effort (180-200W) and when I look at the PT, it reads 150W. So then I shift up a gear in order to get the power up, now my RPE feels higher than tempo and my cadence does drop to around 95.
It isnt fatigue - for example, today I did 1 long loop and a short loop. I struggled on the way back but when I turned back the second time, I had to ease up in order to stay under 200W. Dont think it would be the PT, either - I do a 20 min warmup, and like I said, I noticed it on the second loop as well.
It makes no sense - I noticed this a month ago and initially thought it was fatigue or something. But it has been happening consistently. I can only think of 2 theories:
1/ The pschological impact of the headwind makes me subconsciously change my pedaling technique and try to use force instead of spinning (seems a little weak, but it is a possibility)
2/ The wind is actually a crosswind, coming in at an angle. And resisting the orthogonal component of that force (ie, the bit at right angles to the direction of motion) adds to the RPE, but doesnt show up in the PT
Has anyone else also had something like this happen?
V.
It isnt fatigue - for example, today I did 1 long loop and a short loop. I struggled on the way back but when I turned back the second time, I had to ease up in order to stay under 200W. Dont think it would be the PT, either - I do a 20 min warmup, and like I said, I noticed it on the second loop as well.
It makes no sense - I noticed this a month ago and initially thought it was fatigue or something. But it has been happening consistently. I can only think of 2 theories:
1/ The pschological impact of the headwind makes me subconsciously change my pedaling technique and try to use force instead of spinning (seems a little weak, but it is a possibility)
2/ The wind is actually a crosswind, coming in at an angle. And resisting the orthogonal component of that force (ie, the bit at right angles to the direction of motion) adds to the RPE, but doesnt show up in the PT
Has anyone else also had something like this happen?
V.
#5
...to ease my soul
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: halfway between Erie and Pittsburgh
Posts: 72
Bikes: '96 Gary Fisher Aquila (as a commuter), '91 Schwinn Voyager (stripped and being rebuilt)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
man up, nancy.

#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 910
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have noticed the opposite - I do intervals on a velodrome and my power goes up when going against the wind and I find it harder to maintain (due to needing to up cadence) when riding with a tailwind.
I do the intervals in one gear, so cadence is changing all the time on a loop.
I would think that cadence is likely your issue too - find the point where your cadence is 100 and you are putting out 200W the same as your other leg of effort.
I do the intervals in one gear, so cadence is changing all the time on a loop.
I would think that cadence is likely your issue too - find the point where your cadence is 100 and you are putting out 200W the same as your other leg of effort.
#10
awaiting uci approval
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 961
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix RC 06
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just checking that you have a hub- or crank-based PM, rather than a wind-based one.
#11
Senior Member
How about your position on your bike? Are you getting into an aero tuck or something going into the headwind that is less efficient than your "normal" position?
Otherwise, a watt is a watt is a watt. In a headwind, you just go slower for a given power output.
Otherwise, a watt is a watt is a watt. In a headwind, you just go slower for a given power output.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#12
Making a kilometer blurry
Gusts can mess with my pacing a bit, but you should be able to maintain in a fairly steady headwind. I don't see why RPE would be higher with the same cadence and power as you normally use. That means crank torque and pedal force are the same, and tells me it's largely in the "P" portion of RPE.
Regarding gusts, I gear for the 2/3 toughest winds, so I'll be at 95rpm or so (my normaly happy place) when the gusts are at 2/3 peak. When they let up, I just keep the same gear and take the cadence way up as necessary. If I get a long stretch at higher RPM, I'll up-shift .
Regarding gusts, I gear for the 2/3 toughest winds, so I'll be at 95rpm or so (my normaly happy place) when the gusts are at 2/3 peak. When they let up, I just keep the same gear and take the cadence way up as necessary. If I get a long stretch at higher RPM, I'll up-shift .
#13
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,229
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 624 Times
in
331 Posts
I'm with Tallmantim, it's easier to keep you power output up into the wind, than with a tailwind; a bit like how it's easier to keep your power up uphill, rather than dowhill.
Strong tailwind and you're cruising at a nice speed with less effort, you've got to push yourself to keep the watts up.
In to a headwind, just maintaining what feels like an acceptable pace will require more power, and thus it's mentally easier to keep the watts up (even though you're going slower.)
The opposite doesn't make sense to me, unless its just a mental hatred of headwinds that demoralizes you.
Strong tailwind and you're cruising at a nice speed with less effort, you've got to push yourself to keep the watts up.
In to a headwind, just maintaining what feels like an acceptable pace will require more power, and thus it's mentally easier to keep the watts up (even though you're going slower.)
The opposite doesn't make sense to me, unless its just a mental hatred of headwinds that demoralizes you.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
I often do 5 min intervals back and forth on a stretch of road that always has wind. My legs don't feel any different in either direction but I seem to have more trouble breathing into a strong headwind.
#15
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Gusts can mess with my pacing a bit, but you should be able to maintain in a fairly steady headwind. I don't see why RPE would be higher with the same cadence and power as you normally use. That means crank torque and pedal force are the same, and tells me it's largely in the "P" portion of RPE.
I think you may be on to something with the gusts - it is very gusty and comes in at an angle.
I find that I am constantly surging back and forth at power that is a lot higher or a lot lower than what I am targeting. For example, today's ride was meant to be at 150-175W and I was trying to hold 165. I kept finding myself either at 100-130W or 190-210W. That seems like it would be related to the wind picking up and easing off. And the repeated surges in power could also explain why I get tired more quickly - it is harder than just maintaining a steady pace.
I'm with Tallmantim, it's easier to keep you power output up into the wind, than with a tailwind; a bit like how it's easier to keep your power up uphill, rather than dowhill...[snip]...The opposite doesn't make sense to me, unless its just a mental hatred of headwinds that demoralizes you.

I think WR's explanation about gusts seems to be most likely cause - what do you guys think?
V.
#16
Senior Member
Another thing that might be happening is you are letting off when you are staring at your computer on the headwind leg. Kind of a confirmation bias at work. Maybe do your riding with the numbers covered up and examine the data later.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#17
Carpe Diem
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MABRA
Posts: 13,149
Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unless the headwind is 100% constant and consistent, the perceived exertion is going to be higher because the resistance is constantly changing.
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
#18
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
Thanks for all the feedback, guys. Brian, I'll give it a shot with the PT numbers hidden one day and see if that changes anything. And yeah, I do think that the constantly-changing wind intensity is also affecting the intensity.
Glad to know it isnt in my head
Glad to know it isnt in my head

#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 910
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think that makes the most sense - you can't easily keep the same power output and trying to maintain it during a gust would see your power go to say +150% FTP -> 80% FTP -> 120% FTP etc - much more draining than if you are fighting against a steady wind.