Go Back  Bike Forums > The Racer's Forum > "The 33"-Road Bike Racing
Reload this Page >

Climbing and W/Kg relationship...

Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Climbing and W/Kg relationship...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-11, 12:50 AM
  #1  
Young, Stupid, Bold.
Thread Starter
 
kvangundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Davis, Ca
Posts: 169

Bikes: LiteSpeed Ultimate, BMC SLT01 Team Machine

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Climbing and W/Kg relationship...

As a 3.8 w/kg rider for a flat 20 min TT, at 77kg I feel like my power to weight ratio isn't a a blaringly obvious limiting factor, (though on the mighty bike forums power data scale I'm scarcely fit enough to commute) Despite my above average (for my Cat) w/kg ratio during hill climb races I get dropped like a bad disease. (Cat 4).

Am I missing something? Shouldn't a good power to weight ratio facilitate at least marginal climbing ability? I understand as the grade increases total plays larger role... I suppose I mean to ask, is power/weight and total weight (in my individual case) more important than technique for climbing? Should I focus on climbing strategy, pacing, etc? Or just keep drowning myself in FTP work outs? And dieting once season lets up?
kvangundy is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 06:04 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
shovelhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Western MA
Posts: 15,669

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kvangundy
Am I missing something? Shouldn't a good power to weight ratio facilitate at least marginal climbing ability? I understand as the grade increases total plays larger role... I suppose I mean to ask, is power/weight and total weight (in my individual case) more important than technique for climbing? Should I focus on climbing strategy, pacing, etc? Or just keep drowning myself in FTP work outs? And dieting once season lets up?
Yes.
Maybe.
No.
Yes.
Maybe.
No, now.

You barely mentioned the mental aspect. Knowing when to go above your pace and how long you can be expected to hold it. Knowing when to stay on pace to avoid blowing up. Positioning yourself at the front of the group and surfing back to stay on pace. Your power meter can help you with this, but it's not a magic 8-ball. It can't predict results. Stop focusing on power and start focusing on technique. Group rides are good for this. On our group rides we have no problem at all when a rider wants to take off up a climb, or stay on pace and let the group go. We meet at the top anyway. So try to home your senses for what you are capable of and try a few things that could help you in a race.

Last edited by shovelhd; 04-01-11 at 06:08 AM.
shovelhd is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 07:13 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
You need a good ratio, no way around it. For shorter climbs you'll need a higher number, i.e. be able to put down some decent numbers.

When I lost 30 lbs (2009-2010) I noticed a huge difference in how I went up hills, just huge. My w/kg crept to the magical 3.0 mark (from 2.8w/kg when I was as fit as I got 240w/84kg to 3.0 at 210w/70kg - I may have gotten back up to 240w/71kg but I don't know).

For short climbs I typically have to put down about 6w/kg (500-600w) to stay with the group at a race like Bethel. Peak would be 800-900 each lap. This is different from the 20 min power thing.

Basically, since FTP is hard to change, you need to lose weight. That's been my approach. It's like VO2 max - you can't change that so you have to work on other things.

Of course this year I'm +10 lbs so I'm closer to the 2.8 than the 3.0w/kg.
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 07:24 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
To the OP, how's your 10 minute, 5 minute, 1 minute power? Unless you're getting dropped on climbs of 10+ minutes, then FTP isn't necessarily going to play a huge part. As CDR aluded to, staying with groups on climbs often requires you to hold high wattage for several minutes, much higher than what your FTP is.
StefanG is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 08:07 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by kvangundy
As a 3.8 w/kg rider for a flat 20 min TT, at 77kg I feel like my power to weight ratio isn't a a blaringly obvious limiting factor, (though on the mighty bike forums power data scale I'm scarcely fit enough to commute) Despite my above average (for my Cat) w/kg ratio during hill climb races I get dropped like a bad disease. (Cat 4).

Am I missing something? Shouldn't a good power to weight ratio facilitate at least marginal climbing ability? I understand as the grade increases total plays larger role... I suppose I mean to ask, is power/weight and total weight (in my individual case) more important than technique for climbing? Should I focus on climbing strategy, pacing, etc? Or just keep drowning myself in FTP work outs? And dieting once season lets up?
In the Cat 4 field, I would expect a good climber to be able to sustain about 4.5 W/kg (this is threshold; i.e. 1hr, not 20 minutes) or more. In the 3's it's worse. The Coggan chart merely lists averages. The good riders in the field, the ones who are actually competing for the win, are going to far exceed their "categories" on the chart.

As for training, with a threshold W/kg less than 4, I would focus on threshold. When I was Cat 4 I was a bit like you (similar W/kg). Lots of threshold work later and I can hold my own on most road courses without incurring too much damage on the hills.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 08:36 AM
  #6  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times in 371 Posts
^ End of last season, I was right around 3.8 w/kg, and I'm definitely not a climber.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:11 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
In the Cat 4 field, I would expect a good climber to be able to sustain about 4.5 W/kg (this is threshold; i.e. 1hr, not 20 minutes) or more. In the 3's it's worse. The Coggan chart merely lists averages. The good riders in the field, the ones who are actually competing for the win, are going to far exceed their "categories" on the chart.

As for training, with a threshold W/kg less than 4, I would focus on threshold. When I was Cat 4 I was a bit like you (similar W/kg). Lots of threshold work later and I can hold my own on most road courses without incurring too much damage on the hills.
Cat 4's @ 4.5 w/kg? That's a pretty stiff statement.
WonderLake is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:12 AM
  #8  
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by StefanG
To the OP, how's your 10 minute, 5 minute, 1 minute power? Unless you're getting dropped on climbs of 10+ minutes, then FTP isn't necessarily going to play a huge part. As CDR aluded to, staying with groups on climbs often requires you to hold high wattage for several minutes, much higher than what your FTP is.
This. Also be aware you're in one of the ground zero areas for wanna be climbers and Cat4 sand baggers.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:21 AM
  #9  
Does Not Exist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Voltairia
Posts: 2,094
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Brian is talking about a "good climber" in Cat 4. There are only a few good climbers in Cat 4. I wouldn't doubt that the podium at SDSR in Cat 4 have numbers that high.
efficiency is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:24 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by WonderLake
Cat 4's @ 4.5 w/kg? That's a pretty stiff statement.
That's my experience anyway. I would regularly get dropped on hills at just under 4.0W/kg. And we are talking about climbers here. Get those same fellows in a cross wind and they get blown right off the back.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:25 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 83
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
That's my experience anyway. I would regularly get dropped on hills at just under 4.0W/kg. And we are talking about climbers here. Get those same fellows in a cross wind and they get blown right off the back.
Yeah, I guess i'm not privy to other's power/weights but I'm not much +- 4.5w/kg right now and I'm fairly confident that I would squish the average cat 4 race like a bad habit.
WonderLake is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:26 AM
  #12  
gmt
 
Grumpy McTrumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 12,509
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
you have hour-long hills in races?
Grumpy McTrumpy is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:28 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
you have hour-long hills in races?
Yes.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:48 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
mike868y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,284
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 248 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
my w/kg is good, I'm small, but I suck at climbing. meh.
mike868y is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 09:48 AM
  #15  
Senior Member?
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,977

Bikes: orbea onix, Cervelo SLC, Specialzed Allez, Cervelo P3 Alu

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Not quite sure where Ratliff is getting his data from. I was a "good" climber in the 3's and my 1 hour max is about 3.9. I won a 20 minute hillcimb with a 4.5-4.6.
To the OP, can you hold 3.8 on a hill also? My flat numbers are lower than my climbing ones. Yours might be the other way around if you're more psyched on the flats than the climbs. It hurts, but you have to train the weakness, esp if your weakness is FTP and you're not a track racer.

People can talk about technique, pedal stroke, and tactics all day long. At the end of the climb, the guy with the highest w/kg on that course is the guy that gets to the top first. Keep working on FTP, with the understanding that some shorter, harder efforts will be needed for races with hills shorter than 30-ish minutes. This shorter, harder work will also help to increase your FTP instead of just doing 2x20's all day.
brianappleby is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:03 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Either you are seriously underestimating your W/kg, or the Oregon fields are more competitive than the Denver fields. My 1 hour max is a bit over 4 and I am far, far, far from a good climber in the Cat 3 field. For 20 minutes I can put out 4.5-ish W/kg and I wouldn't even be near the top of the field on a hill climb. I know the guys who are winning the hill climbs here, and I can't even hold their wheel for 5 minutes when they are running full bore up a climb.

But numbers aside, the larger point is spot on. On a climb, the only thing that matters is W/kg. If the OP is getting dropped with what he's capable of, the only solution is to increase his capabilities through threshold training. Doesn't matter the technique or all those other fine subtleties; those come later when you are battling in an even matchup. Doesn't matter what some chart in some book says. If you are getting dropped, then the only choice is to train harder (or race different races).
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 04-01-11 at 10:15 AM.
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:14 AM
  #17  
Young, Stupid, Bold.
Thread Starter
 
kvangundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Davis, Ca
Posts: 169

Bikes: LiteSpeed Ultimate, BMC SLT01 Team Machine

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My nearest climb is a 70 mile route, do-able but it takes an entire day's dedication. I was a track sprinter before road: 18.3 w/kg peak, 9.6 w/kg 1 min, 4.9 w/kg 5 min( The 5 min is untested, just an arbitrary peak pulled off of WKO)

Flat races and crits I feel wonderful, plenty of gas in the tank for a good kick at the end at the pack sprint. Gotten lucky a few times and has some success. I'm just growing frustrated feeling so pigeon holed into flat racing, I'll try to spend more time chasing down the mountain goats on my team. To keep with the pelaton I normally attack before the climb and slowly drift back to the rear of the pack by the time we crest, then take fast lines down the hill to get back into a decent position.

@Racer Ex...Really? That makes me feel better, its been disgusting watching those lithe little bastards float away from me every time the ground begins to rise. I may be one of the accused Cat 4 sandbaggers, I've taken top 5 the past 5-6 crits...I won't / can't upgrade because my rr stats are abysmal to say the least.

@cdr... I'm a huge fan of your blog, it's been one of the best resources I've had learning this, my first, year of road racing. I've modeled a lot of my training and technique off of your info, I'm genetically similar to you; Cat 1 caliber sprint and the FTP of an asthmatic McDonald-ian. Do you cut weight during season? Or is weight management better left to winter and off-season?
kvangundy is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:23 AM
  #18  
Senior Member?
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,977

Bikes: orbea onix, Cervelo SLC, Specialzed Allez, Cervelo P3 Alu

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
Either you are seriously underestimating your W/kg, or the Oregon fields are more competitive than the Denver fields.
I keep telling myself that my powermeter is reporting low, and that I couldn't possibly be sucking this bad. How awesome would that be?
brianappleby is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:26 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
OP: Have you done Mt. Diablo?
caloso is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:28 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Just reporting what I've noticed from racing here. I think your powermeter is mis-calibrated .
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:32 AM
  #21  
Fast for a sloth
 
miwoodar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fort Collins
Posts: 1,134

Bikes: Some

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brianappleby
I keep telling myself that my powermeter is reporting low, and that I couldn't possibly be sucking this bad. How awesome would that be?
You and me both.

~6000 feet of elevation is reported to be worth about an 8 to 10% reduction and many of our climbs start around there. I don't know what your experience is when going to sea level Brian but I had the luxury of riding in Indiana last time I was home visiting the family. I was sick with the flu and still set an all time one hour record on a completely flat route.
miwoodar is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:36 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
^^^
Actually, I think you are onto something here. Being a mile high will certainly affect your power output. 10% would put appleby's numbers right in the range I've observed in Oregon.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:43 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
SalsaPodio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa
Posts: 965

Bikes: 2012 Parlee Z5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think Brian's numbers are a decent ballpark estimate. I'm competitive in the 3s and my FTP is only ~4.3-4.4 W/kg
SalsaPodio is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 10:51 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
Good climbers tend to be good climbers regardless of category. Get good climbers from every category and you'll have a group of riders with very similar w/kg and very similar climbing speed. The good 5s will climb with the good 4s will climb with the good 3s will climb with many of the 2s. That's the extent of my experience/knowledge.

Climbing is where tactics basically mean nothing. Yeah, there's a draft, kind of. Yeah, you can do this or that trick. But when my untrained friend in SoCal beats me up the actual Palomar climb by 30 minutes... little things don't matter.
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 04-01-11, 11:10 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ruidoso, NM
Posts: 1,359
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by kvangundy
My nearest climb is a 70 mile route, do-able but it takes an entire day's dedication. I was a track sprinter before road: 18.3 w/kg peak, 9.6 w/kg 1 min, 4.9 w/kg 5 min( The 5 min is untested, just an arbitrary peak pulled off of WKO)
I concur that 3.8W/kg is not that good for a competitive Cat4 climber. But you have some awesome peak and 1min numbers! Feel good about that... most people suck at everything.

If you haven't done a long block of *only* endurance riding, then put that on the schedule... will probably have to wait until after the season. I'm talking about 10+ weeks of only Z2 or Z3 riding. Go longer and slower, if you have the time. If you want to build your aerobic capacity to your genetic max, this is necessary IMO.
rruff is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.