![]() |
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
QFT- this was a big one when I was a multi-sport kid, thought I was pretty darn lean... numbers don't lie, and the majority of the weight-centric industry has grasped that it is easier to help people feel better about themselves than it is to help them fix the real problems.
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
I've heard of Recon cassettes shearing- but those were older ones, and used in an MTB context (yeah, don't do that)
I'd certainly use them myself without worry, but I think that my level of caring about this stuff is lower than yours. Yes, the weight differences are NUTS- the first time I picked up a Recon cassette was a similar "WTH" sensation like the first time I picked up an 808 rim... doesn't seem like it should be possible. Risk thresholds vary- I use Ultegra or Chorus everywhere, recently sold off my last carbon wheels, and alloy tubulars + Ultegra makes this stuff superfluous on my bikes. Mine won't break, but race bikes also weigh 16-17 lbs.
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
I'd say get on the narrow/wide bandwagon and do some testing. See if you can drop a chain, I didn't believe in Di2 when it first came out until a bike company that sponsors my team and is our main brand at the shop handed me a long-term loaner bike and said, "go ahead, try to make it mess up." I couldn't make it drop a chain, even when I legit tried- testing makes a believer out of me, and the narrow-wide stuff is similar for me.
Not having access to a clutch-style RD on the Di2 setup makes it a bit trickier- but I think it'd work for you pretty darn well. YMMV. I'm just back from Bend, spent some time with a friend/ex-coworker who moved there a month or two ago. He's gone narrow-wide, scraped together all the parts, nothing fancy pretty well only the chainring and not a clutch style RD or anything else, using a XT double crankset (so not perfect chainline).... he hasn't dropped a chain yet, and he's a fast "DH-get-rowdy" kid. only question is i may have a few shifts under load, but all other parts, chain, etc. will be clean. could shear off a tooth, i guess, but it's not like the whole cassette would fail.
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
Aerolites- worth looking into. Mercury/TriRig has gotten rights to use the patent (or something of the sort, it's legal at least), and they are claiming 35g per side, and they work with standard cleat mounting standards. Read the reviews, its frankly right up your alley on a project like this.
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
How about cables- are you using standard cables and housing? There are lighter weight options, some work better than others, but it'll free up a few grams.
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
Tyres- I assume you are running those fancy-euro-pro contis?
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
Bar tape- given you are going with a bullhorn setup (nice thinking, I was going to suggest this after thinking about the theme- it's pretty standard for British hill-climb bikes), what tape are you using, and what weight are you at?
For a bullhorn setup, you shouldn't need to wrap the center section of the bars- and since it is a short event, have you considered skateboard deck tape or similar? Weighs just about nothing.
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
To save the grams from the mounting hardware, just put the head unit in your jersey pocket/leg band?
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
how esoteric do you want to get?
i've considered tires, built up light wheels, skewers, top cap, seat post collar, post, cassette, removal of FD, 1 brake, different bars, stem, using my lightest frame...and a few things i've ruled out.
Originally Posted by save10
(Post 16905795)
you could
-remove bar tape and just go with a few pieces of electrical tape to hold any wiring in place -lighter cages (i'm sure you though of that) -consider taking the cover off your saddle (or an old one). I know some guys that took the cover off their old SLRs and then drilled the body for more weight savings. the cover doesnt really effect comfort and wont be a factor over a shorter race. i have this chinese carbon thing on my bike and its fine. Hylix Road Bike Carbon Saddle Seat Fit MTB Riding Ergonomics 91g Touple SL | eBay -are you running clinchers? veloplugs are reported to be lighter than rim tape. I have them on one of oldest clincher sets....works fine -i think some water bottles are lighter than others...you should look in to that -finally my oakley half jackets are boat anchors compared to my smith pivlocks or no sunglasses at all saddle cover is interesting, though my saddle happens to be a very light one with minimal cover/padding (it's what i happen to use regardless of weight). it's like 110g or something ridiculous--but the main point for me is comfort. i appreciate the ideas. |
Originally Posted by Hida Yanra
(Post 16905787)
I'd say get on the narrow/wide bandwagon and do some testing.
this thread is helpful as it helped narrow down that ring situation for me. your experience with the recon makes me curious enough to possibly give it a go. if you had a bad experience with that or with the wide/narrow, i'd be more likely to avoid it. i have a chain guard on hand and can run an inner catcher, so if the wide/narrow thing doesn't work to my satisfaction i can always bail back to it. thanks! very much appreciate the discussion. |
so just a climb. Have you considered not gluing your tubulars or maybe just one glue layer. Get a good shave early am or night before. take the padding out of your helmet.
|
Originally Posted by thechemist
(Post 16906171)
so just a climb. Have you considered not gluing your tubulars or maybe just one glue layer. Get a good shave early am or night before. take the padding out of your helmet.
you're a data guy--i can tell you how to test tires sometime using a power meter, speed sensor and some rollers. no padding in the helmet. hadn't thought of that one! it's not a USAC race, so i was thinking the other day i might not even have to wear a helmet. the non-USAC thing is why i can run one brake. bet the insurance of the event would specify helmets. as for the shave...i'm not that hairy. :) |
This might be helpful The Mt. Washington Hillclimb: A case study | ccbracing
|
If it's a short hillclimb, you can drink an extra gallon or two of water for the couple days leading up to it which will cause you to shed a bunch of water weight in order to maintain ph levels. Wouldn't do it for a long race, but for an hour? Sure.
|
Fudgy's full of healthy ideas. Mega doses of caffeine, enemas, and now hyper hydration.
|
I actually like the colonic instant weight loss idea. Except it might violate the usual rule of not trying anything radically new before a race. Hate to think of the potential downsides there (though the downsides would probably continue to contribute to weight loss).
|
thanks for the useful ideas. we probably should rename this thread...and maybe start a new racer tech thread as this got highly specific.
i apologize if we got derailed a bit and the thread became more focused on the entirety of my hill climb than i intended...i'm pretty confident in terms of the gear i plan to run but wanted to vet the single ring/catcher/bolt stuff. going to test the wide/narrow ring w/o a catcher and w/ a shorter chain; i'll fall back to a guard and/or catcher if i'm not satisfied with my testing. PS cogburn's a super smart and strong guy! thanks, grumpy. |
Remove the the seat and seat post and stand the entire race.
|
Here's a postman outclimbing Phillipe Gilbert after handicapping Gilbert with an extra 50 lbs of bicycle.
|
Originally Posted by globecanvas
(Post 16912699)
Here's a postman outclimbing Phillipe Gilbert after handicapping Gilbert with an extra 50 lbs of bicycle.
|
Originally Posted by Hermes
(Post 16912628)
Remove the the seat and seat post and stand the entire race.
i think i'm going to go with a unicycle instead. |
did something of a dry run today. i decided to do two hard efforts up this climb. it was mainly for my bigger training picture but also would give me a chance to see where i am for this hill climb. ran 50/34+11-25 today and stayed in the 34 the whole time as a test; i think a 36 or 38T single will be fine. there were a couple spots where i could spin out, but i could do with a few seconds of rest.
for reference, last year i rode up it in 32:08 during the mass start race. on friday, i rode up it in a little over 38', but it was the first climb of a day when i went up 3 mountain passes, and i have training wheels/tires, 3 24oz bottles, food for 4h, etc. today i rode up in 33:10. i'm a bit lighter (5#), bike was in the same trim as last year, and i was carrying a full bottle and some other stuff (phone, multitool, etc.) that added up to an extra 2# or so. my little back-of-the-envelope calculation based on my after-the-fact power predicted 33:02. i dragged my feet so started 4h later than the race day start (i'm no morning person!)....so got the bonus of >25F warmer....85 vs 57F. on race day this year i hope to be a bit lighter, i'll ditch all the excess bike weight, and will carry pretty much nothing. might be 7# shaved. even though the power was down about 5% from last year on race day, i was pretty thrilled. if i want to meet my goal i'll need to be UP 2-3% from last year. don't know that will happen as i'm in a situation of rebuilding post-injury rather than gaining, but i've got to do the work anyway for the long-term, so it is what it is. i intentionally trained through. for those who speak power, post-clavicle and then post-femur, my CTL was in the low 40s. over the last 5 weeks i've built back up to 90. (i don't put any stock in a difference of, say, 94 or 97CTL, but there's a difference between 105 & 80.) TSB was -30 this morning...so 5% down isn't bad. (last year was sitting at 105CTL & +13TSB.) i'll either go without water entirely or maybe my wife will do a mid-course hand-up. i used a hammer flask with a few sips of sports drink last year, but it's mostly psychological. was strapping on my HRM today and realized there's 50g of excess. the HR is only for data recording...and probably the most useless data. (yeah, i could ditch my SRM, but that saves only 73g over a specialized spider...or 126 w/ a garmin 500; i think that data post-ride will be more valuable to me, but it also may be useful during the race to help save the 3" it will cost.) again, if the turbo doesn't fire on race day or if the winds are unkind, i won't make it in my goal time, but all this sweating of the small stuff helps stack odds in my favor. |
Originally Posted by globecanvas
(Post 16912699)
Here's a postman outclimbing Phillipe Gilbert after handicapping Gilbert with an extra 50 lbs of bicycle.
|
Consider the energy cost, in terms of TSS, you incur by worrying about fiddly stuff on your bike.
|
Originally Posted by Creakyknees
(Post 16914634)
Consider the energy cost, in terms of TSS, you incur by worrying about fiddly stuff on your bike.
i don't run parts that don't work. anyway, this is a special project. i recognize it doesn't matter anywhere else outside of a pure hill climb, and the goal is totally personal / i.e., has no relevance to anyone but me. |
On a whim, I picked up a new old stock Scott Foil (and because it was super cheap), but it's got a 25mm offset seatpost and I'm needing the zero offset version. Anyone know if these are available for sale anywhere?
41? |
Originally Posted by hack
(Post 16918182)
On a whim, I picked up a new old stock Scott Foil (and because it was super cheap), but it's got a 25mm offset seatpost and I'm needing the zero offset version. Anyone know if these are available for sale anywhere?
41? If you really want to go light on this ditch the Di and go to a single friction shifter mounted on the bar and a SRAM red rear mech (it'll take a 14t lower jockey). 10speed Token aluminum cassette. Tufo S3 Lite tires (145g). Ti skewers with screw on fasteners. Carbon saddle as noted. No rear brake. KCNC front with a cyclocross type lever. Powercordz cable. You can get a flat carbon MTB bar in the 105g range. There's around 2+ pounds right there. If this is the Venge there's >200g of paint on it... |
Originally Posted by Hermes
(Post 16912628)
Remove the the seat and seat post and stand the entire race.
|
I was soft pedaling while coasting the other day, meaning the freehub body was clicking, aka not engaged. I could get the SRM to read 2-5 watts. I know my bearings are pretty crunchy, not as bad as 2010 (when I could get the SRM to read 15 watts on no load - the bearings were literally indexed every so many degrees). My comment on Contador's bearing thing has got me thinking that saving 2-5 watts would be significant for me, at least in terms of background wasted energy. One of these days.
|
Originally Posted by hack
(Post 16918182)
On a whim, I picked up a new old stock Scott Foil (and because it was super cheap), but it's got a 25mm offset seatpost and I'm needing the zero offset version. Anyone know if these are available for sale anywhere?
41? tetonrider, just curious what bike is this going to be on? |
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
Yes. Scott will sell you one at a stupid price, but if you Google around I've seen several people that would swap your 25 for their zero (I would have when I got my Foil).
Originally Posted by ips0803
(Post 16918555)
There's a thread on weightweenies for people to swap.
|
Originally Posted by ips0803
(Post 16918555)
tetonrider, just curious what bike is this going to be on?
|
thanks for the suggestions.
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
If you really want to go light on this ditch the Di and go to a single friction shifter mounted on the bar and a SRAM red rear mech (it'll take a 14t lower jockey).
going the red route (rd, friction shifter, separate brake lever, cable/housing) would be about 300g. that's a meaningful difference. might leave this one on the table for next year as it involves buying more parts and a bit more building. (not much, but at this point i'm low on time.)
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
10speed Token aluminum cassette.
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
Tufo S3 Lite tires (145g).
regardless, i've got some light vittoria tubulars (190g) on a light wheel set. glued up, tested low Crr... race proven for me already.
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
Ti skewers with screw on fasteners.
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
Carbon saddle as noted.
could go with a saddle+post combination...they make some crazy light ones. probably looking at 50-100g, which at this stage where gains are tiny is actually huge.
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
No rear brake. KCNC front with a cyclocross type lever.
i'll be running a di2 tt brake/shift lever. it's essentially the weight of a regular TT brake lever, so that's one area where di2 pays off a bit.
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
Powercordz cable. You can get a flat carbon MTB bar in the 105g range. There's around 2+ pounds right there.
flat bar is definitely a savings of about 100g. i went the bullhorn route because i have one and i have the TT brake/shift levers. great thought.
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 16918314)
If this is the Venge there's >200g of paint on it...
at this point, i've got to pretty much shut things down. the HC is in about 2.5 weeks, i'm traveling for about 10 days in between, and i need to install and test the setup (wide/narrow single ring+no FD+no guides/guards; bullhorn+tt shifter setup, etc.). i think i've trimmed about 3# off of my bike (which is ridiculous...it wasn't exactly heavy last year) vs how i ran it last year. the ideas above could trim another 300g (red, flat bar, powercordz, saddle+post), which is insane. might leave those to ponder for next year, in case i'm close but fall short on my goal this year. thank you! |
Originally Posted by carpediemracing
(Post 16918402)
I was soft pedaling while coasting the other day, meaning the freehub body was clicking, aka not engaged. I could get the SRM to read 2-5 watts. I know my bearings are pretty crunchy, not as bad as 2010 (when I could get the SRM to read 15 watts on no load - the bearings were literally indexed every so many degrees). My comment on Contador's bearing thing has got me thinking that saving 2-5 watts would be significant for me, at least in terms of background wasted energy. One of these days.
bearings aren't hard to replace. incidentally, one reason why some pro teams use full ceramic bearings is not that they save energy (bikes are really the wrong application), but rather they can power wash the stuff without risk of corrosion. yeah, they have to use proper grease, but rust isn't a factor. a good steel bearing is pretty awesome. losses like what you describe don't scale with power, so with your self-described lower average power, you would stand to see more gain. if i were closer i'd personally replace them for you. |
Originally Posted by carpediemracing
(Post 16905639)
Aluminum cogs? The big ones especially.
Have you optimized your pedals? Ti axle, esp for the short event. I think the Look hardware is steel, just soft. There are ti bolts out there for Looks. Alum spacers if they're not already, I don't know what they are. If it were me I'd make my Aerolites work. About 70g per pair with cleats and hardware (they say 38g per side, that's about right), but it's the devil to set up, you have to drill into your shoes. In fact I still want to make my Aerolites work but it's such a pain. probably not going to do the aerolites at this point but may consider in the future...esp if this year is "close-but-not-quite." |
Originally Posted by carpediemracing
(Post 16918396)
There's a guy that used to do the Gimbels ride with no post/saddle. I think he was featured in some local paper article. I tried to stay away from him.
wound up losing a spot due to the crash but finished pretty respectably. i was 3rd or 4th over the top (the riders ahead of me were way out of my league)--and i didn't want to give up that performance. in hindsight, it was pretty risky. the terrain wasn't insane at that point but the rest of the descent was fast & loose. my quads have never been so sore! |
Originally Posted by tetonrider
(Post 16914540)
for a laugh, i've thought about doing this climb with a backpack & jugs of water totaling what i used to weigh in 2009. quick calcs put me at 8-9' slower, but it is a substantial amount of weight so i think the back-of-the-envelope thing falls down a bit...would probably be far, far slower.
|
Originally Posted by rankin116
(Post 16923928)
I'm sure I've missed it, but how much have you lost since 2009?
as of this morning, i'm 1.5# away from the target weight i set 8 months ago. will probably go for a DXA in a few weeks, just out of curiosity. i've been a little heavier and ~9% BF. i think i'm lighter and leaner now. i'd guess 7-8%. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.