Racer Tech Thread
#5051
Tyrannosaurus Rexitis
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 952
Bikes: Scott Addict 6870
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
not sure of your racing level, but my advice would be to either (a) race the TT like you mean it (to win) if you are capable of placing high in the GC or to (b) don't worry about it and go easy.
if (a), then respect it and put the requisite effort into the discipline -- training and gear.
if (b), use the energy you save to pull off a win(s) in other stages.
/snip
for me, that means taking a hard look at the a/b choice above.
if (a), then respect it and put the requisite effort into the discipline -- training and gear.
if (b), use the energy you save to pull off a win(s) in other stages.
/snip
for me, that means taking a hard look at the a/b choice above.
I'll likely just save this TT frame in my basement until cat 3.
As for the wheel thing, the Jet+ wheels are awesome. I don't ever take them off my bike. Aero data backs up the wider wheels for sure so get 25mm. Whooshy noises for days. They do hold and get up to speed better but a good body position is worth one heck of a lot more. Want to descend a hairpin turn in the rain? They've got you covered. Neutral descent at Quabbin in the rain like two years ago? Hell yeah.
Last edited by Harlan; 08-08-17 at 05:32 AM.
#5052
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,187
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 243 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You really are overthinking this to the point of micro-management. Quit under utilizing it if you plan to race on it next year.
Say you picked up track or CX for the first time this Winter. Do you think first blush will produce more meaningful results and experience? Or would having ridden that bike exclusively for a few months outside of racing or training provide insights and muscle memory you could revisit this year?
Food for thought. My only concern here is what is wrong with a frame that was given away for free. Personally I'd go over it until I found exactly that.
Say you picked up track or CX for the first time this Winter. Do you think first blush will produce more meaningful results and experience? Or would having ridden that bike exclusively for a few months outside of racing or training provide insights and muscle memory you could revisit this year?
Food for thought. My only concern here is what is wrong with a frame that was given away for free. Personally I'd go over it until I found exactly that.
#5053
Nonsense
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Vagabond
Posts: 13,916
Bikes: Affirmative
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 878 Post(s)
Liked 538 Times
in
236 Posts
do you have a coach? i've been thinking of ways to improve my performance next year. as i race on aluminum rims, everyone always tells me to get carbon race wheels. i'm also on a budget though and figure even the cheapest carbon wheels are worth ~3 months of coaching, which is probably more beneficial to my racing.
You should get a coachbro, bro!
#5054
commu*ist spy
do you have a coach? i've been thinking of ways to improve my performance next year. as i race on aluminum rims, everyone always tells me to get carbon race wheels. i'm also on a budget though and figure even the cheapest carbon wheels are worth ~3 months of coaching, which is probably more beneficial to my racing.
#5055
Rides too much bike
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Boston
Posts: 842
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I feel like I want to chime in here.
Deep Carbon: In my opinion it is useful if you make it useful. I am a breakaway guy and in my experience deep carbon wheels do make a difference. Even if it is just a half MPH more when you are OTF that really matters in a race. As for braking I have mostly used newer rims. They are great when dry (arguably better than my aluminum rims) and in the rain you just need to hit them a little earlier which is not really that big a deal and I have had the same experience with aluminum rims in the rain (hit them earlier).
TT Frames: This was the first year I have used a real TT bike and it really does make a world of difference. But yeah, you need to dial your position in. Personally I couldn't get comfortable till I saw Dean Phillips, he made a few simple adjustments and my power went up, along with comfort and if I were to extrapolate from my before and after TT results I got more aero as well.
Deep Carbon: In my opinion it is useful if you make it useful. I am a breakaway guy and in my experience deep carbon wheels do make a difference. Even if it is just a half MPH more when you are OTF that really matters in a race. As for braking I have mostly used newer rims. They are great when dry (arguably better than my aluminum rims) and in the rain you just need to hit them a little earlier which is not really that big a deal and I have had the same experience with aluminum rims in the rain (hit them earlier).
TT Frames: This was the first year I have used a real TT bike and it really does make a world of difference. But yeah, you need to dial your position in. Personally I couldn't get comfortable till I saw Dean Phillips, he made a few simple adjustments and my power went up, along with comfort and if I were to extrapolate from my before and after TT results I got more aero as well.
#5056
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I feel like I want to chime in here.
Deep Carbon: In my opinion it is useful if you make it useful. I am a breakaway guy and in my experience deep carbon wheels do make a difference. Even if it is just a half MPH more when you are OTF that really matters in a race. As for braking I have mostly used newer rims. They are great when dry (arguably better than my aluminum rims) and in the rain you just need to hit them a little earlier which is not really that big a deal and I have had the same experience with aluminum rims in the rain (hit them earlier).
TT Frames: This was the first year I have used a real TT bike and it really does make a world of difference. But yeah, you need to dial your position in. Personally I couldn't get comfortable till I saw Dean Phillips, he made a few simple adjustments and my power went up, along with comfort and if I were to extrapolate from my before and after TT results I got more aero as well.
Deep Carbon: In my opinion it is useful if you make it useful. I am a breakaway guy and in my experience deep carbon wheels do make a difference. Even if it is just a half MPH more when you are OTF that really matters in a race. As for braking I have mostly used newer rims. They are great when dry (arguably better than my aluminum rims) and in the rain you just need to hit them a little earlier which is not really that big a deal and I have had the same experience with aluminum rims in the rain (hit them earlier).
TT Frames: This was the first year I have used a real TT bike and it really does make a world of difference. But yeah, you need to dial your position in. Personally I couldn't get comfortable till I saw Dean Phillips, he made a few simple adjustments and my power went up, along with comfort and if I were to extrapolate from my before and after TT results I got more aero as well.
we're lucky that it's relatively dry in norcal, but I've been riding the same cabon rims for 30+k miles in training and in some races. (the 50mm ones). I paid $800. I weigh 185 and descend as much as I climb without issue in re: to the brakes.
#5057
commu*ist spy
yes, this. all of this is what I would say.
we're lucky that it's relatively dry in norcal, but I've been riding the same cabon rims for 30+k miles in training and in some races. (the 50mm ones). I paid $800. I weigh 185 and descend as much as I climb without issue in re: to the brakes.
we're lucky that it's relatively dry in norcal, but I've been riding the same cabon rims for 30+k miles in training and in some races. (the 50mm ones). I paid $800. I weigh 185 and descend as much as I climb without issue in re: to the brakes.
#5058
commu*ist spy
i'm not opposed to building my own.. I don't mind the labor.
2x$80 flo 30s (aluminum!)
$30 shipping
~80 on cx sapim spokes (20/24)
$70 novatec hubs (or others; open to suggestions)
+ tax and whatever..
---------------------
~$375
well.. that's not a whole lot of savings compared to just getting deeper 50 mm carbon rims from china.. nevermind
2x$80 flo 30s (aluminum!)
$30 shipping
~80 on cx sapim spokes (20/24)
$70 novatec hubs (or others; open to suggestions)
+ tax and whatever..
---------------------
~$375
well.. that's not a whole lot of savings compared to just getting deeper 50 mm carbon rims from china.. nevermind
#5059
Senior Member
for the record i wasn't doubting the benefits of aero gear, just saying that for me if the question was "$500 to make my cycling better" i'd go elsewhere, but I understand everyone has different priorities, etc.
#5061
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 3,888
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Great wheels and why we have him on our kit. I had about 30k on my 50mm wheels before they died a quick death in a crit crash last month. Already have an order in for more.
#5062
W**** B*
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Central IL (Chambana)
Posts: 992
Bikes: Several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I train and race (road) on carbon. I'm 150lbs and never notice any issues with braking, even in the wet.
I have a set of November RFSC 58mm, recently set up tubeless with Schwalbe Pro Ones, and a set of Reynolds Attack. Both with PT hubs.
TT bike has a set of HED Jet 5/9, care a little less about weight there, and use a Wheelbuilder AeroJacket on the 9. Also a PT hub.
In the wet I just hit the brakes for a second before I really need them to clear the water and then they brake great.
I have a set of November RFSC 58mm, recently set up tubeless with Schwalbe Pro Ones, and a set of Reynolds Attack. Both with PT hubs.
TT bike has a set of HED Jet 5/9, care a little less about weight there, and use a Wheelbuilder AeroJacket on the 9. Also a PT hub.
In the wet I just hit the brakes for a second before I really need them to clear the water and then they brake great.
#5063
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
if you want carbon wheels for racing, i'm cleaning out my garage and have a bunch of tubular wheelsets i'm inching closer to selling. i think tubulars are relevant for racing in big packs--e.g., saw many dudes flatting after hitting square edges at KSR, and that's basically a non-issue with tubulars.
i think a set of 808FC are going to a buddy.
i also have a set of 303FC (basically new) with Vittoria CX IIIs, Shimano C50s (Specialized Turbo Allround 24s), and 404s (front is new after being sent to Zipp for that hub recall).
all are 11s.
(i also have an H3 tubular, H3 clincher, Zipp Super 9 clincher.)
i got around to taking pictures and am inching closer to listing them. i'd make a good deal on any of them. I love them all but I'd rather see them put to use than sit in my garage.
i think a set of 808FC are going to a buddy.
i also have a set of 303FC (basically new) with Vittoria CX IIIs, Shimano C50s (Specialized Turbo Allround 24s), and 404s (front is new after being sent to Zipp for that hub recall).
all are 11s.
(i also have an H3 tubular, H3 clincher, Zipp Super 9 clincher.)
i got around to taking pictures and am inching closer to listing them. i'd make a good deal on any of them. I love them all but I'd rather see them put to use than sit in my garage.
#5067
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
cycling analytics with the power history chart.
eye opening for me.
everybody wants to be fast but don't nobody want to ride these heavy ass lung-busting 3 minute efforts.
eye opening for me.
everybody wants to be fast but don't nobody want to ride these heavy ass lung-busting 3 minute efforts.
#5068
Ninny
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The Gunks
Posts: 5,295
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 686 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What settings do you find most useful/interesting?
.. I'm not sure how useful I find it. A lot of my peak power per time numbers are from workouts where I did the first interval way too hard and ended up spending less time in zone than would have been optimal. I'd rather see a more customizable chart of historical time in zone -- the zone analysis chart is almost what I need but if you hide zones zones, the y-axis doesn't rescale so the visualization is not great.
.. I'm not sure how useful I find it. A lot of my peak power per time numbers are from workouts where I did the first interval way too hard and ended up spending less time in zone than would have been optimal. I'd rather see a more customizable chart of historical time in zone -- the zone analysis chart is almost what I need but if you hide zones zones, the y-axis doesn't rescale so the visualization is not great.
Last edited by globecanvas; 08-10-17 at 10:23 AM.
#5069
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 10,978
Bikes: aggressive agreement is what I ride.
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 967 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
What settings do you find most useful/interesting?
.. I'm not sure how useful I find it. A lot of my peak power per time numbers are from workouts where I did the first interval way too hard and ended up spending less time in zone than would have been optimal. I'd rather see a more customizable chart of historical time in zone -- the zone analysis chart is almost what I need but if you hide zones zones, the y-axis doesn't rescale so the visualization is not great.
.. I'm not sure how useful I find it. A lot of my peak power per time numbers are from workouts where I did the first interval way too hard and ended up spending less time in zone than would have been optimal. I'd rather see a more customizable chart of historical time in zone -- the zone analysis chart is almost what I need but if you hide zones zones, the y-axis doesn't rescale so the visualization is not great.
#5070
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,101 Times
in
1,415 Posts
I mean, it's chicken/egg, but for me I find confirmation in my belief that I get fastest when I do all-out 3ish minute efforts. They are the hardest for me mentally, but when I look at that chart and run it against my best periods of fitness, it's when I have high 3-min efforts.
#5071
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#5072
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What settings do you find most useful/interesting?
.. I'm not sure how useful I find it. A lot of my peak power per time numbers are from workouts where I did the first interval way too hard and ended up spending less time in zone than would have been optimal. I'd rather see a more customizable chart of historical time in zone -- the zone analysis chart is almost what I need but if you hide zones zones, the y-axis doesn't rescale so the visualization is not great.
.. I'm not sure how useful I find it. A lot of my peak power per time numbers are from workouts where I did the first interval way too hard and ended up spending less time in zone than would have been optimal. I'd rather see a more customizable chart of historical time in zone -- the zone analysis chart is almost what I need but if you hide zones zones, the y-axis doesn't rescale so the visualization is not great.
the interface is a bit of a PITA, but i would think with your background you would enjoy the ability to basically plot anything, and do so as you want to see it.
#5073
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,449
Mentioned: 64 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 693 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I mean, it's chicken/egg, but for me I find confirmation in my belief that I get fastest when I do all-out 3ish minute efforts. They are the hardest for me mentally, but when I look at that chart and run it against my best periods of fitness, it's when I have high 3-min efforts.
edit to add: most amateur road races are blown apart in a span of 2-3'. we'd like to think that it's about FTP (and it can be, for some), but usually (a) selective hills in amateur races in the USA are not all that long and (b) the split happens in the first 2-3', regardless.
there are examples to the contrary, of course.
train to the demands of the event rather than pretty #s on a pace.
#5074
Cat 2
I've become "proficient" with Golden cheetah over the last year and I'm very pleased with it. Between GC and plugging rides into TP(basic) I have more than enough data and analytical information.
#5075
Senior Member
edit to add: most amateur road races are blown apart in a span of 2-3'. we'd like to think that it's about FTP (and it can be, for some), but usually (a) selective hills in amateur races in the USA are not all that long and (b) the split happens in the first 2-3', regardless.