spectastic

based on experience, my top tube preference is 56-57 cm with 110-120 stem. I'm thinking about going smaller to a 55 eff top tube and a 130 stem, for crits, training and stuff.. I think this won't change my fit. the weight will shift forward, there will be some toe overlap, handling will be smoother. the head tube is large enough to not have to stack a tower full of spacers. I don't know what will happen to the sprint though. But a lot of people warn you about picking frames outside your average size. I don't know if thats because people don't understand they can change their stem lengths, or if there's something I dont know about switching to a frame generally considered way too small for someone who's 6'.

the reason for this is to try it out, building an inexpensive race bike and using my current training frame for another build. any tips would be appreciated

TheKillerPenguin

That seems awfully cramped, but we're all special snowflakes so you do you.

globecanvas

This comes up regularly. I think the only generally legit reason to size the frame down and go with a long stem is if you need more drop than the frame allows. Otherwise, you are going to be making a significant handling and "feel" change for somewhat fuzzy reasons.

Having said that, if it's easy for you to try out a small frame with long stem, go for it. I went through exactly this thought process a while ago and test rode a too-small frame with a long stem. I didn't like how it felt.

wens

So the advantage to doing this is saving money on having extra bikes? If I'm reading this right, sounds stupid.

Looigi

Try it out. A lot depends on the specifics, but many pros use frames that would be considered too small by typical recreational/enthusiast standards. I'm 5'9" and 6'3" G Hincapie rode the same model and size frame as me.

caloso

This.

10 Wheels