View Single Post
Old 11-06-06, 06:13 PM
  #20  
halfspeed
Senior Member
 
halfspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275

Bikes: are better than yours.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
No because the seatpost isn't that heavy.
Neither are a few centimeters of frame tubing. Since metal frame tubing is usually butted and seatposts usually are not, a cm of extra seatpost tends to be heavier than a cm of extra frame tubing. So while you =might= save more frame tubing than you add seat post, the seat post you add is heavier. When you account for this, the net difference in weight and stiffness going from a sloping to horizontal top tube is trivial to none.

If there were a true advantage in weight and stiffness of a sloping top tube, then in a sport where these minor differences are actually relevant it would be a bit hard to explain how that sport's top event had been won seven of the last eight times without it. (It could even be eight for eight, I haven't kept up on the controversy.)
halfspeed is offline