View Single Post
Old 03-15-07, 05:04 PM
  #456  
bmike
Bye Bye
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone gone gone
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bruce Rosar
Perhaps in Newspeak, but not in English. A dictionary definition of 'bicycle' begins with the words: a vehicle...
A definition for vehicle is a means of carrying or transporting something <planes, trains, and other vehicles>

In other words, cyclists are allowed to use some of the Interstate system already.

Some of us already have; some others just refuse to believe it.
Are you agreeing or arguing with me?

I do mingle with the cars and trucks and fossil fueled vehicles - and think it is one way to ride... (95% of my riding occurs on roads travelled by a mix of 'vehicles'.... but I also mix it up with the joggers and runners and walkers on the "path".

There are obvious differences between cars and trucks - where a mighty acceleration of lots of weight is available at the push of a pedal and a bicycle where accelration (and top speed) is directly related to the user... and one can (unscientifically) conclude that on a bike someone that accelerates and travels quickly is relatively experienced and comfortably handling his / her machine - where in a car the skills of a driver are not directly related to how fast and far they can travel - or the damage they can do when they lose control.

If we are to break everything down to a dictionary I'd prefer to use one pre-dating autos.

Language is relative and contextual - and I did stress in my post that I was refering to the differences between fossil fueled vehicles on the road and bikes. I do not think you can argue that there are significant differences - no matter what the definition is.
__________________
So long. Been nice knowing you BF.... to all the friends I've made here and in real life... its been great. But this place needs an enema.
bmike is offline