View Single Post
Old 02-27-04, 12:41 PM
  #12  
Buzzbomb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Suburban Detroit
Posts: 552
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by supcom
Damage to the derailleur, or other parts, caused by the other guys use of the damaged equipment is his own responsibility. He should have inspected his bike - or had a competent mechanic do so - before attempting to operate the bicycle. You did not cause the damage to the derailleur, he did through the operation of equipment that even a simple inspection would have determined to be unfit for continued use.

However, you could also take the position of, having reviewed your recollection of the circumstances surrounding the incident, you realize that the other guy was riding too closely considering that you and he had never ridden together and were not familiar with the riding style and abilities of the other and furthermore, the other guy was following too closely for the road conditions and did not allow sufficient room to avoid an emergency stop. Furthermore, when you did attempt to stop for an obstacle, the other guy recklessly passed too closely to the side of you and put himself and his bike in harms way. As such, you feel that you are not liable for damages incurred in the accident he could easily have prevented.
If I was to pay a penny, it would only be half of the damage directly caused by the crash. That he chose to ride without checking the rest of the bike thoroughly makes him the 100% owner of the resultant damage. After the reaction from him to your generous offer (see above re: riding in groups) however, I wouldn't give him one red cent.
Buzzbomb is offline