View Single Post
Old 03-29-07, 07:08 PM
Senior Member
closetbiker's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 6 Posts
Oh, be reasonable John and read what is posted. I've gone over this and you have selective memory that a re-reading would correct. I answered your queries. I think you look for things that aren't there. You think they are. Fair enough. Where in the world have I said those injuries on the video were rotational injuries? A larger circumferance leading to them? I said the heads weren't involved in the falls. Diverting attention? I think some people can't pay attention to what the issue is and the questions that are surrounding it. It's responses like this that shows how the helmet issue is used by proponents to exploit the limited ability of understanding the issue to build customer loyalty through limited understanding. It's best customers are loyal because they can't see both sides of the issue. Reasonable people understand there are limits.
closetbiker is offline