Originally Posted by don d.
I also have a Brooks Conquest on one of my bikes. Keep in mind that it is the same width, 160mm, as their standard racing saddle, the Professional, so it may not be suitable for an upright stoker position.
I talked to Wallingford about getting the B72 style springs under a Conquest top. The B72 springs seem like a nice half step between an unsprung saddle and a fully sprung saddle.
That said, the B67 should be suitable for someone who rides less frequently, has a wider pelvis, and is looking for max comfort.
OK, I just opened the box from Wallingford. I ordered both the B66 and B72. The B72 may as well not even have springs from what I can tell. It looks cool, but has almost no give. Even the B66 springs are not bouncy (they feel "properly done"), I'm going with the B66 if Pam approves.
Thanks