I don't care if they beat the SRM or not. That study, however, I would argue with. The results are well within the SRM's claimed tolerance. The SRM also shows less of a variation with temperature.
Of course, that all ignores the fact they only tested one unit. To get a general comparison of two strain gauge devices, i'd rather see several units (at the minimum) of each tested.
...then again, if your PT drops your HR, is their a comparison?
Originally Posted by
curveship
As an implementation of straingauges, the SRM is average at best.