Originally Posted by
genec
Frankly around here "Vehicular Cycling" tends to leave bad taste in peoples' minds due to the association with some of stranger ideals of HH and Forester. Vehicular Cycling in of itself is not so much a "demon" as some might make it out to be.
That is perhaps part of the difference between 'cycling vehicularly' vs. VC. Especially if one is talking about the
sprit of meanings. I haven't read EC so I can't give a strict definition of VC, so I tend to say I am vehicular in describing my cycling 'style' - that for me means the describing the actual practice without the extra baggage (good or bad) of the theory that may come along with VC.
Al