View Single Post
Old 03-03-08, 07:28 PM
  #3  
Script
Senior Member
 
Script's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida,Indiana,Pennsylvania
Posts: 179

Bikes: Seven (brand, not number....

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
You're part of the majority that believes "well marked bike lanes" make routes safer.
The majority is often wrong, and in this case is most definitely so.


I don't even know if the increase in width increases cyclist safety. But once the width is there, i don't see how a stripe of paint helps, and I certainly see how it hinders.


I don't think believing that cyclists have equal rights, and riding accordingly, is aggressive. Why do you?
Can you provide some supporting data, please. I don't mind being wrong but a little bit more support than your opinion would be helpful.

And how does a stripe hinder?

I can't help but observe that insistence on equal rights for something like a bike versus a car is pretty silly. And yes, agressive cycling sure helps all those OF auto drivers justify their shouts of 'Get on the Sidewalk!". They don't know and they don't care what the laws are.

Script is offline