Originally Posted by
cc700
so i definitely don't agree with the guy, but his logic is based on actuality. the more idling and the more deceleration, the more pollution. if you separate car streets and bike streets you can quit it but san fran isn't exactly a simple landscape for that kind of solution.
sure, but where are your facts linking better bike infrastructure and more bike usage to more congestion
among automobile drivers? seems to me like good infrastructure and more bike usage means
fewer cars AND more congestion because bikes and cars won't be using the same pathway
at different speeds.
?
???