Originally Posted by
Patrick_C
Here's the catch: the suburban cities, towns, and (especially) state DOTs are not going to be too keen on building separate bicycling facilities outside of the dense urban core, where most people tend to bicycle. SO, bicycle lanes and paths are generally built where they are not as needed: dense urban areas with slower traffic speeds and lower volume.
Building separate bicycling facilities, i.e. "paths", in dense urban areas in the U.S. Really? Where?