View Single Post
Old 05-27-09, 01:13 PM
  #1520  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by mtnbke
Okay...teach me to fish.

Why not use a crank longer than 190mm on a conventional frame? Because of the likelihood of clipping a pedal?
I know this isn't the answer you're looking for, but... I just don't see why you would want crank arms that long. It's true that longer arms give more leverage, but in my experience any crank arm over 150 mm or so gives perfectly adequate leverage for my purposes. And it's not because I'm too short (I'm 6'). I gather you're bigger than me (how tall are you?), and can handle something longer; and from your handle I gather you do more off-road riding than I, so longer crank arms may be justified. But longer than 190? I just can't see why anyone would need that.

Can you maintain a cadence of 90 rpm indefinitely? If not, I'd suggest you work on that.

I know, I know, this isn't the answer you were looking for. I'll shut up now.
rhm is offline