Old 07-15-09, 01:28 AM
  #13  
Mr. Beanz
Banned.
 
Mr. Beanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 19,895

Bikes: Lemond Chambery/Cannondale R-900/Trek 8000 MTB/Burley Duet tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Rider
I rode centuries on my half-bike before I became a stoker. Captain had never done more than a metric on any bike when we did the Palm Springs century in '07. He felt so good after that that we did a century a month from Feb.-October.

I think it depends on the individual -- if they want to ride a solo century, they will. But just because you can ride a century solo, doesn't mean you should, unless you really want to -- otherwise it's a long, lonely ride.
You would be he one to answer. Speed, strngth keep arising here but what I'd like to know is, since you have done both:

IS doing a century on a single more glorious than doing it on the tandem? Are you more proud of your efforts on the single over the tandem? Or is it the same glorious feeling? Are you more proud to say you have done a century on the single, or just as proud to say tandem too?
Mr. Beanz is offline