Originally Posted by
BLACK BIKE
How do you figure that officers' suspicion didn't exist when it was, in fact, correct. The only thing that "didn't exist" here was the officer's ability to articulate their suspicions. If more people would learn the importance of proper report writing, the courts wouldn't be forced to hand down rulings like this. What happened here is a case of scumbag attorneys perverting our constitution in order to set a criminal free, and you call this liberty.
If I think that a coin is going to land heads up and it does, it doesn't make my psychic. It makes me lucky.
If a police officer stops somebody based on nothing but a wild goose chase, and finds something, it doesn't necessarily mean he had a reasonable suspicion. It means he was lucky.
What happened here is a case of an attorney holding our officers accountable in order to protect ALL of us from spiraling into a fascist state. I hope that the officers involved go on to have careers protecting us in a manner that is both legal and productive.