View Single Post
Old 08-20-09, 07:19 AM
  #9  
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
rhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 339 Posts
Originally Posted by stausty
I apologize for my not understanding, but could you elaborate or rephrase this with fewer pronouns?
I'll take a stab at it!

For Buyer to have a legal case against Seller, in the event that the crank failed and Buyer or his kin was injured, Buyer would need proof that Seller knowingly sold a bicycle in damaged, not fit to be ridden, condition. This thread proves that Seller knows about the damage and should be aware that it is potentially dangerous. The question would be, whether Buyer knows about it.
rhm is offline