View Single Post
Old 11-03-09, 07:48 PM
  #12  
Wogster
Senior Member
 
Wogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931

Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Commando303
I think it's natural in a case like this for the biking community to demand, "WHY WASN'T [so-and-so] CHARGE UPHELD!" but, really, none of us knows whether or not the motorist was driving recklessly — accidents can occur even if you aren't, and it's entirely possible the driver wasn't being reckless. That said, he or she did leave the scene of the accident, and, in an occurrence in which a pedi-cab ends up totaled, it's unbelievable the motorist wouldn't notice anything went wrong. In my opinion, though it's understandable as stemming from panic or fear, hit-and-run is an inexcusable crime, and the punishment must be fines+imprisonment+loss of driving privileges.
There are almost no traffic accidents, there are traffic collisions, and they are usually the result of someone making a mistake. 99.999% of the time that someone does run after causing a collision, it's due to the fact they think they may get into trouble, and they think they will not get caught. Thing is there are so many places that have security cameras now that your chances of getting caught are improving every day.
Wogster is offline