View Poll Results: Do you think handsfree cell phones are safer?
Yes
19
31.15%
No
29
47.54%
Maybe
9
14.75%
Not sure
4
6.56%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll
Is handsfree safer?
#1
Dominatrikes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is handsfree safer?
Do you think handsfree cell phones are safer than the regular kind? Sometimes they want laws against using cell phones while driving unless they are hands free. But I don't think handsfree cell phones are safer. Do you?
#4
Elite Rep
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Handsfree would have to be safer then holding a mobile phone while driving. Although you are still concentrating on the call, with hands free its just like talking to someone it the car. Plus you dont have to stress about holding your phone up with one hand, and trying to do everything else which is illegal. Not talking, is always safer then talking, but handsfree does make a big difference I feel.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6,521
Bikes: Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It doesnt make any difference what type of phone you are using, because the danger is caused by what the phone does to your mind - takes attention away from driving.
#6
Elite Rep
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well so does talking to people in a car, takes your mind away from driving. If you think about it, holding a phone while driving adds extra concentration on holding the phone itself. With handsfree, your eyes and hands are to move freely like you would normally driving. Even though it dosn't produce 100% concentration for driving, it makes a difference, and its also Legal.
#7
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 40
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes, I'm sure that handsfree cellphones are safer than ones you hold. Not much safer, but marginally. I fly small planes IFR, and if properly trained, you can do a LOT and still attend to the task at hand. I think the main problem with cellphones is that the conversation is rarely related to the task of driving, so it's distracting. I think the data on this are pretty good. - Jim
#9
Dominatrikes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndrewP
It doesnt make any difference what type of phone you are using, because the danger is caused by what the phone does to your mind - takes attention away from driving.
#10
Elite Rep
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It exactly the same as having a conversation in the car. Exept I would think that the conentration rate would be higher, because you HAVE to talk and think when your on a call, unlike when the person is right next to you, your not under 'pressure'. Still you have to admit that handsfree would make a difference.
#11
We drive on the left.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As has been mentioned previously, talking to a passenger is not nearly as distracting as talking on a phone. A phone call requires constant talking whereas a passenger can see if the driver is busy and can pause the conversation until the driver is ready to talk.
I don't believe hands free is any safer. The user still has to dial numbers to make a call, which requires the driver to look away from the road. Even with hands-free there will always be those people who decide to SMS whilst driving and that is even more dangerous.
From memory Germany and a few other countries have banned hands-free and "normal" mobile phones completely while driving.
Down here mobiles are banned while driving. The police issue about 3000 fines per year. I think the fine is currently $315, plus a loss of 3 demerit points.
CHEERS.
Mark
I don't believe hands free is any safer. The user still has to dial numbers to make a call, which requires the driver to look away from the road. Even with hands-free there will always be those people who decide to SMS whilst driving and that is even more dangerous.
From memory Germany and a few other countries have banned hands-free and "normal" mobile phones completely while driving.
Down here mobiles are banned while driving. The police issue about 3000 fines per year. I think the fine is currently $315, plus a loss of 3 demerit points.
CHEERS.
Mark
#12
52-week commuter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,929
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Totally unscientific, but I don't like handsfree. It's harder to see that a driver is using the cell phone. I like to be able to see them and avoid them.
#13
Senior Member
I put down that I don't know.
Hands are occupied less, but there still is some looking and searching to turn the cell on or off as well as dialing. Those buttons are so small, you can't help but look away from the road to search the keyboard to make the cell do what you want it to.
Hands are occupied less, but there still is some looking and searching to turn the cell on or off as well as dialing. Those buttons are so small, you can't help but look away from the road to search the keyboard to make the cell do what you want it to.
#14
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally Posted by jaldridge
Yes, I'm sure that handsfree cellphones are safer than ones you hold. Not much safer, but marginally. I fly small planes IFR, and if properly trained, you can do a LOT and still attend to the task at hand. I think the main problem with cellphones is that the conversation is rarely related to the task of driving, so it's distracting. I think the data on this are pretty good. - Jim
I'm reposting this from something I posted in a past thread...
Originally Posted by khuon
Yep... it's another case of context mismatch. Also in many other situations of two-way radio communications, there are specific protocols of speech that are followed. These are designed to reduce confusion and maximise efficiency. "... four november delta... squawk VFR... radar services terminated... frequency change approved..." During a typical phone conversation, the line of discussion can weave around wildly forcing the user(s) to devote even more brain processing cycles to maintain coherent thought... cycles that are stolen from other tasks.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#15
when come back, bring pie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central Washington
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It depends on the driver's level of training and experience. For example, I believe the use of cell phones in any way should be banned for typical drivers. However, police officers and other officials are trained to do multiple things at once -- drive safely, watch out for offenders, watch for vehicles or people on the watch list, talk on the radio, etc. Often effective police do two or more of these things at once.
Is hands-free safer than hands-on? No, I think it's more dangerous. I think it gives the driver a false sense of security. It's the conversation, not the act of holding a phone, that's the danger here.
Is hands-free safer than hands-on? No, I think it's more dangerous. I think it gives the driver a false sense of security. It's the conversation, not the act of holding a phone, that's the danger here.
#16
Tom (ex)Builder
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 2,814
Bikes: Specialized Allez
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There have been much-publicized studies saying that hands free doesn't make you safe. True. But safer? Of course. I hate to be nasty to those that think otherwise, but it's a no-brainer. Not having to hold a phone to your head HAS to be more safe than holding a phone to your head. Is it perfect? Of course not. Is it as safe as not talking on the phone at all? Of course not. Is it as dangerous as talking to someone in the passenger seat? I think it's safer.
Personally if I have to take a call while driving, I prefer to put the phone on speakerphone option and clip it to my visor. Having said all that, I'll admit to having talked to my wife riding the bike using the earpiece. Did about 20 miles that way one night...late, no traffic, she was out of town so it was the only way I'd get to talk to her.
Personally if I have to take a call while driving, I prefer to put the phone on speakerphone option and clip it to my visor. Having said all that, I'll admit to having talked to my wife riding the bike using the earpiece. Did about 20 miles that way one night...late, no traffic, she was out of town so it was the only way I'd get to talk to her.
__________________
Tom
"It hurts so good..."
Tom
"It hurts so good..."
#17
Chairman of the Bored
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 5,825
Bikes: 2004 Raleigh Talus, 2001 Motobecane Vent Noir (Custom build for heavy riders)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
no, all that happens is the person often ends up fidgeting with the cord, or still holding the stupid thing....plus it's far more complicated to shove a tiny plastic object in your ear and make it stay, then answer the phone, and put it back in your pocket, than it is to just answer it and get it over with.
Really, IMO handsfree sets were made explictitly to cater to the "sharper image" shoppers...who often just go for the latest cool gadget regardless of practicality. There's nothing wrong with being a gadget freak...but keep in mind that gadget doesn't always equal practical
Really, IMO handsfree sets were made explictitly to cater to the "sharper image" shoppers...who often just go for the latest cool gadget regardless of practicality. There's nothing wrong with being a gadget freak...but keep in mind that gadget doesn't always equal practical
#18
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
IMHO, I do not consider an earpiece to be "handsfree". I'm using a speakerphone system in my vehicle. My phone has Bluetooth capability and just pairs with it. I can also voice-dial, voice-answer and voice-reject via the speakerphone.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#19
Work hard, Play hard
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,596
Bikes: Cannondale super V 500, Bianchi Piaggio(hopefully getting a new road bike when I get some money)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I say no.
Handsfree just means that the driver is going to crash into you with two hands on the wheel instead of one.
Handsfree just means that the driver is going to crash into you with two hands on the wheel instead of one.
#20
Elite Rep
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1. Concentration IS improved. No matter how you look at it, it is SAFER not to be holding a phone that it is to be holding it. You now have two hands to use, not one.
2. It does depend on the driver, some are more skilled then others and can do multiple tasks.
3. I agree that you would concentrate more when you are speaking to a passenger, as opposed to talking on a phone where you HAVE to speak and concentrate. Although Hands-Free helps improve conentration levals, so you dont have to worry about holding the phone, or fumbling around with it.
3. To answer a call you press the 'answer button'. You talk and then you end the call with another press of the button. Thats not life threating. It just the same as pressing buttons on the radio.
Even though talking on the phone is still distracting, you have to admit that Hands Free features make it easier and safer to use then holding a phone.
2. It does depend on the driver, some are more skilled then others and can do multiple tasks.
3. I agree that you would concentrate more when you are speaking to a passenger, as opposed to talking on a phone where you HAVE to speak and concentrate. Although Hands-Free helps improve conentration levals, so you dont have to worry about holding the phone, or fumbling around with it.
3. To answer a call you press the 'answer button'. You talk and then you end the call with another press of the button. Thats not life threating. It just the same as pressing buttons on the radio.
Even though talking on the phone is still distracting, you have to admit that Hands Free features make it easier and safer to use then holding a phone.
Last edited by blue_neon; 04-21-05 at 03:47 AM.
#21
cycle-powered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Posts: 1,848
Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dutchy
From memory Germany and a few other countries have banned hands-free and "normal" mobile phones completely while driving.
Mark
Mark
QUITE often on the autobahn a car passes me at 200km/h and then later i pass him and he later comes zooming by... "oh, he's on the hands-free phone" - unable to pay attention enough to maintain speed. (note: typically 40-60-something mercedes drivers)
i agree with most here that hands-free is definitely much safer than normal cell phone. beyond that it depends on the user, where the typical user is NOT able to safely to both. as to the comparision with an in-car conversation, the difference is the passenger sees that the drivers has to deal with driving and waits (or reminds the driver) until the situation where concentration is required is over... on a business call or whatever, i imagine the salesman NOT telling the customer every 30 seconds "hold one i gotta concentrate on driving"...
IF people would THINK and pay attention, hands-free cell-phones can be ok. but in practice they're still pretty unsafe as many people concentrate on talking over driving or even worse with the intention of "distracting them from a boring drive in traffic"
#22
.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: .
Posts: 3,094
Bikes: .
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Handsfree phones are weird enough when people use them just walking, you see these people apparently suffering badly from full-blown schiziphrenia, ranting and raving and talking loudly to no one, then you realize their on their handsfree phone.
#23
Elite Rep
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 2,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lilHinault
Handsfree phones are weird enough when people use them just walking, you see these people apparently suffering badly from full-blown schiziphrenia, ranting and raving and talking loudly to no one, then you realize their on their handsfree phone.
#24
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
It's all about training. Communicating while in the process of operating a vehicle or a piece of machinery is a skill that needs to be developed. Most people talking on the phone do not have this skill. Do you think the guy left-seat in the cockpit of the 777 is gesturing wildly and yelling into his mic as he's making for the numbers on short final? Do you think the guy on SEAL team 5 engaged in a CQB action isn't constantly aware of what's going on around him while at the same time talking to his teammates so they coordinate their fields of fire? What makes these guys different? They've received proper training. The subject of the conversation is contextually related to the situation at hand. Even in general aviation, you're taught how to act on the radio. You're taught how to form your sentences and phrase things in a manner which can be easily deciphered during a high-stress situation. Information is tokenised and related in a format that provides for proper context-flow. There is even built-in verbal error correction procedures to minimise one party mishearing or misunderstanding the other.
Now normal day-to-day conversation isn't going to be as structured or formal. However, nothing in life is always structured or formal and this goes for driving too. In general, people are bad at context switching and need to be trained to handle it. If it's not the mobile phone that can cause a person to context switch then it's the baby in the backseat or something on the radio. Driver training is really poor in preparing the driver for dealing with a multitasked environment. I posted on this a few months ago in a previous thread.
Now normal day-to-day conversation isn't going to be as structured or formal. However, nothing in life is always structured or formal and this goes for driving too. In general, people are bad at context switching and need to be trained to handle it. If it's not the mobile phone that can cause a person to context switch then it's the baby in the backseat or something on the radio. Driver training is really poor in preparing the driver for dealing with a multitasked environment. I posted on this a few months ago in a previous thread.
Originally Posted by khuon
It's called context switching and many of us are very bad at it. It can be overcome with training however. Pilots undergo this sort of training... emergency response folks do too. Perhaps rather than enacting laws to ban this, that and the other thing, we should revise our training to take into account the fact that one needs to be able to maintain situational awareness as well as context switch between several tasks in today's modern driving environment. Rather than spend all of our efforts attempting to eliminate distractions (an exercise in futility as far as I'm concerned), I think some amount of effort should be made in teaching drivers how to better deal with them. Now I'm not advocating that everyone go out and gab on their phones in the middle of traffic but I am advocating that everyone know how to handle the situation. Whether to answer or make a call while driving should be a matter or priority management and it should be the case that either decision should leave the driver with a fair margin of safety.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#25
1.9lb/in
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Susquehanna shoreline
Posts: 1,360
Bikes: LeMond, CAAD9/1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a handsfree set and I lost it for awhile. I can say with absolute certainty that I am a crap driver when I'm holding a cell phone. The difference is extreme. I am fine with the handsfree kit.
I don't gesticulate when on the phone; I do when speaking to someone directly.
I think the order of concentration for me is: no music > music > handsfree > passenger > cellphone in hand
That's me, though. I see plenty of dip****s that shouldn't be allowed on the road without their hands glued to the steering wheel and an AWACS above giving them warnings.
I don't gesticulate when on the phone; I do when speaking to someone directly.
I think the order of concentration for me is: no music > music > handsfree > passenger > cellphone in hand
That's me, though. I see plenty of dip****s that shouldn't be allowed on the road without their hands glued to the steering wheel and an AWACS above giving them warnings.