Do you pass this cyclist ?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Do you pass this cyclist ?
County road, 45 mph limit but 50 - 60 mph typical. Unusual that there are no approaching cars at the moment as this is a fairly busy road. Bicycle rider can't really ride on the shoulder due to debris so he's as far right as practicable (and farther right than many along here who would be taking the lane). Do you pass?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 55
Bikes: Trek WSD 7000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From the picture, i would say yes, but i might wait till i could see Down the hill before doing so.
#4
Surf Bum
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184
Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I would do what 99% of drivers do: go slightly over the yellow line and pass. I can't imagine getting ticketed for that maneuver. If I was the cyclist, it wouldn't bother me either.
__________________
Thirst is stronger than the rules. - Stars and Watercarriers, 1974
Thirst is stronger than the rules. - Stars and Watercarriers, 1974
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
It is hard to tell the condition of the shoulder. It looks fairly clear from the photo, but I've ridden sewups long enough to not like to ride on debris (but that is changing with clinchers). However, I think the cyclist should be 2 or 3 feet to the right.
#6
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Now the other factor not mentioned is the cyclist's speed... if said cyclist was doing 5MPH while approaching this little rise, and I could possibly pass before the rise... but frankly, everything in this scene says to wait.
I have NEVER been in a car in a situation in which a minute or three of waiting for someone else on the road, would make any difference in my life.
#7
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
The biggest reason not to "go slightly over" at this rise, is you never know if someone on the other side is doing the same thing for the same reason.
#9
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
I go through this discussion with my wife from time to time... she likes to drive, and thus she tends to be in the drivers' seat while I tend to navigate and make phone calls etc. There are lots of narrow roads in the mountain and coast areas of California... Whenever this sort of question comes up, I always ask... what fire is she going to...
Or better yet, ask your self... would you want someone flying past you like that?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
- If the bike swerves towards the car for some unforeseen reason, there is more time for the car driver to react.
- If there is, in fact, a car coming over the hill, one can react quicker, and slam on the brakes and pull in behind the bicycle if necessary.
- A collision between bike and car at 20 MPH is much less damaging than one at 60 MPH, and the car can stop quicker in case of an accident.
One thing about the yellow lines. They are painted with the visibility as would be required to pass a fast moving vehicle. So, if you're in a car driving at 60 MPH that passes a car driving at 50 MPH, it takes much more space than it takes to pass a bike going at 10 to 15 MPH.
BTW: what is the road sign that is barely visible? That may also impact one's driving.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,977
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1638 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
495 Posts
At this point no, I would wait until I could see over the crest of the road. It appears there may be a sign on the right warning of a stop sign ahead, if that is the case, another reason to wait.
__________________
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 745
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
With the area where 'Genec' lives: Genec KNOWS that motorists WON'T let cyclists drive over the lines, into the road.
Motorists are the type rather sideswipe, hence give lesser gap to the cyclists. Hence shoving the cycling toward the should of the road.
This is all a mindset game. That possibly turns into a hit-and-run.
Motorists are the type rather sideswipe, hence give lesser gap to the cyclists. Hence shoving the cycling toward the should of the road.
This is all a mindset game. That possibly turns into a hit-and-run.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times
in
44 Posts
Why in the world wouldn't I pass? I literally can't imagine reason not to pass. I would be in the other lane for maybe 30 feet, knowing that a tractor trailer doing 75 was on the other side of that rise wouldn't change my decision. Jeez Louise.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
If there is a stop sign on the other side of the hill, then oncoming traffic won't be going 70 MPH.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
As pictured, no because there is a stop ahead beyond the rise, similar conditions sans the stop with no oncoming traffic, yes.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
In almost every instance I would pass that cyclist. Then again, I do almost all my travelling about on a bike, so the only issue for me would be whether or not the road was clear behind us.
More to the point of the OP: While the lane position of the cyclist may be ambiguous (folks like myself are generally either fully in the lane or fully out), if I were that rider I wouldn't be fazed in the slightest at being passed by a motorist. There's plenty of asphalt even if Scotty beams an oncoming car into play for everyone to deal.
I'm assuming that the cyclist in this photo is a slow-mover (one of those 10-15 mph riders) and that the way is clear (easier to tell in real life than in a photo). If he's riding much faster, I'd just chill and wait for a better passing location. Of course I'd also wait if there was any sign of oncoming traffic. Just treat the cyclist as an obstruction and go over the solid yellow when safe to do so. (There have been a few legal beagles who have filed briefs regarding this behavior in my state and I've never heard of a judge disagreeing.)
I've had instances on small shoulder rural highways with limited sight lines when I have had to slow my big rig to cyclist speed for a few miles because I couldn't be certain of a safe pass. It doesn't cause me any discomfort at all; I just settle in until it is safe to pass. Traffic is traffic, whether it's a horde of car-addicted suburban commuters bringing the interstate to a stand still or someone on a bike cruising along at his best pace.
More to the point of the OP: While the lane position of the cyclist may be ambiguous (folks like myself are generally either fully in the lane or fully out), if I were that rider I wouldn't be fazed in the slightest at being passed by a motorist. There's plenty of asphalt even if Scotty beams an oncoming car into play for everyone to deal.
I'm assuming that the cyclist in this photo is a slow-mover (one of those 10-15 mph riders) and that the way is clear (easier to tell in real life than in a photo). If he's riding much faster, I'd just chill and wait for a better passing location. Of course I'd also wait if there was any sign of oncoming traffic. Just treat the cyclist as an obstruction and go over the solid yellow when safe to do so. (There have been a few legal beagles who have filed briefs regarding this behavior in my state and I've never heard of a judge disagreeing.)
I've had instances on small shoulder rural highways with limited sight lines when I have had to slow my big rig to cyclist speed for a few miles because I couldn't be certain of a safe pass. It doesn't cause me any discomfort at all; I just settle in until it is safe to pass. Traffic is traffic, whether it's a horde of car-addicted suburban commuters bringing the interstate to a stand still or someone on a bike cruising along at his best pace.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 240
Bikes: Marinoni Piuma, Boulder All-Road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Nah I'd wait until I could see down the hill. And I'd be completely in the other lane when I did it.
#19
Senior Member
In almost every instance I would pass that cyclist. Then again, I do almost all my travelling about on a bike, so the only issue for me would be whether or not the road was clear behind us.
More to the point of the OP: While the lane position of the cyclist may be ambiguous (folks like myself are generally either fully in the lane or fully out), if I were that rider I wouldn't be fazed in the slightest at being passed by a motorist. There's plenty of asphalt even if Scotty beams an oncoming car into play for everyone to deal.
I'm assuming that the cyclist in this photo is a slow-mover (one of those 10-15 mph riders) and that the way is clear (easier to tell in real life than in a photo). If he's riding much faster, I'd just chill and wait for a better passing location. Of course I'd also wait if there was any sign of oncoming traffic. Just treat the cyclist as an obstruction and go over the solid yellow when safe to do so. (There have been a few legal beagles who have filed briefs regarding this behavior in my state and I've never heard of a judge disagreeing.)
I've had instances on small shoulder rural highways with limited sight lines when I have had to slow my big rig to cyclist speed for a few miles because I couldn't be certain of a safe pass. It doesn't cause me any discomfort at all; I just settle in until it is safe to pass. Traffic is traffic, whether it's a horde of car-addicted suburban commuters bringing the interstate to a stand still or someone on a bike cruising along at his best pace.
More to the point of the OP: While the lane position of the cyclist may be ambiguous (folks like myself are generally either fully in the lane or fully out), if I were that rider I wouldn't be fazed in the slightest at being passed by a motorist. There's plenty of asphalt even if Scotty beams an oncoming car into play for everyone to deal.
I'm assuming that the cyclist in this photo is a slow-mover (one of those 10-15 mph riders) and that the way is clear (easier to tell in real life than in a photo). If he's riding much faster, I'd just chill and wait for a better passing location. Of course I'd also wait if there was any sign of oncoming traffic. Just treat the cyclist as an obstruction and go over the solid yellow when safe to do so. (There have been a few legal beagles who have filed briefs regarding this behavior in my state and I've never heard of a judge disagreeing.)
I've had instances on small shoulder rural highways with limited sight lines when I have had to slow my big rig to cyclist speed for a few miles because I couldn't be certain of a safe pass. It doesn't cause me any discomfort at all; I just settle in until it is safe to pass. Traffic is traffic, whether it's a horde of car-addicted suburban commuters bringing the interstate to a stand still or someone on a bike cruising along at his best pace.
Just to add... From a cyclist viewpoint, tho I personally wouldn't want someone to blast by me, I prefer they don't dawdle if the way is clear. All of my cycling involves being on fastish (40 mph) suburban streets or state highways, and having a car pacing me is nerve-racking. I'm not sure what they are going to do, and if there is a hazard in the shoulder or bike lane, I can't move out.
#20
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I ride like that a lot of the time. I would absolutely pass. It annoys me when people do not pass in these situations. It makes me nervous having cars hang behind me when there's no need to.
The yellow lines are painted in locations calculated assuming that a car is passing another car and it will take 1/4 mile to do and the car will have to move over an entire lane. When passing a bike, you can get the whole thing over in 150 feet and only have to move half a lane so you can get back in the lane faster. Therefore I don't think the lines are 100% applicable to passing bicycles. In some cases, sure. I don't advocate passing cyclists really close to a blind hill or corner, but you can certainly do it closer than you could when passing a car.
The yellow lines are painted in locations calculated assuming that a car is passing another car and it will take 1/4 mile to do and the car will have to move over an entire lane. When passing a bike, you can get the whole thing over in 150 feet and only have to move half a lane so you can get back in the lane faster. Therefore I don't think the lines are 100% applicable to passing bicycles. In some cases, sure. I don't advocate passing cyclists really close to a blind hill or corner, but you can certainly do it closer than you could when passing a car.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,509
Bikes: 3 good used ones
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
All clear. Gun it and blow coal in the cyclists face as I blast my horn which plays a few notes from Dixie like the General Lee.
...oh, and yell Hee Haw!
...oh, and yell Hee Haw!
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,658
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5763 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,404 Posts
Absolutely, I pass him.
I ignore the painted lines and operate under "old law" namely wait until there's enough sight distance to see beyond what I'll need as passing room, and no oncoming traffic. Then I move over as much as necessary to have safe passing room -- typically leaving a 6' wide "lane" between my car and the fog line. or more if needed -- then complete the pass. I have no issue straddling the line during the pass because that makes it a less abrupt maneuver, and allows me to swing back into lane in less linear distance.
I ignore the painted lines and operate under "old law" namely wait until there's enough sight distance to see beyond what I'll need as passing room, and no oncoming traffic. Then I move over as much as necessary to have safe passing room -- typically leaving a 6' wide "lane" between my car and the fog line. or more if needed -- then complete the pass. I have no issue straddling the line during the pass because that makes it a less abrupt maneuver, and allows me to swing back into lane in less linear distance.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times
in
3,346 Posts
Shouldn't you mount a Semi Horn, Ship Horn, or Train Horn on your vehicle... just to wake up the apparently dazed cyclist?
#24
Senior Member
Just before any of you pass him, would you give a brief and light honking just to make him aware? If I were in his situation I would appreciate, both to not be startled and to make sure not to make the slightest move to the left (even though I have mirrors)--I would probably move to the right for you.
If you are driving a large/wide vehicle such as a truck, maybe you should slow down and give warning?
If you are driving a large/wide vehicle such as a truck, maybe you should slow down and give warning?
Last edited by vol; 05-31-15 at 07:38 PM.
#25
Banned