Missouri lawmaker wants 15' pole with flag requirement on lettered highways
He apparently tried to ban cyclists on these roads, but now has moved to requiring a florescent flag a minimum of 15 feet above the ground.
https://momentummag.com/a-proposed-m...orescent-flag/ Cyclelicious » Missouri: 15 foot fluorescent flag for cyclists |
Seems a certain anti-bike politico is in favor of 15-foot enema tubes.......
|
He should stop sitting on his brains, and get on a bike.
|
Excellent Idea.
So, every time you take your bike into a building with an 8 foot ceiling, one has to take the flag off. 15 feet? That is above the view of most cars. Perhaps visible for truck drivers? I wonder how many bike paths in Missouri have less than 15 foot clearance? Is the plan to make sure every underpass and tunnel and culvert the trails go through have the minimum of 15 foot clearance? Trees trimmed to less than 15 foot? What about the mountain bikers? I could imagine heading down a MTB trail with a 15 foot flag flying above one's bike. |
It's amazing the type of intelligence that is elected into office, and here at home, no vehicle can exceed 14 feet in height.
Height & Low Clearances |
So he's okay with land schooners sailing down the highway? Sounds great, finally time to get a recumbent with full sails and rigging. Hope the folks behind me don't mind us tacking across the highway into the wind.
|
Where would I even buy such a thing? Do I have to fabricate it myself?
|
Originally Posted by Chief
(Post 18460963)
Where would I even buy such a thing? Do I have to fabricate it myself?
I'd expect something that would come apart like a fishing pole. Another thing for people to steal off of people's bikes. Perhaps something that would go up and down like an electronic car antenna, but non-metallic as one wouldn't wish it to conduct electricity. Hmmm... What happens when one's 15 foot pole gets wet and hits a power line? Does the law even specify the size of the flag? So, a 1 square inch flag would be legal, as long as it is so far above the road that it could barely be seen???? I would hope the Misery Legislators aren't insane enough to pass a ridiculous law like this. But, the worst thing might be if they actually rewrite it to require the use of the standard 6 foot kiddie flags. |
Where would I even buy such a thing? |
So, if this hypothetically went through, would the government be liable for the destruction of infrastructure by enthusiastic activists with weaponized flagpoles?
Better yet, could you sue the government for destroying your property when your flag catches on things? I mean, the cyclists are just following regulations! |
Paralyzed from the neck up
|
Saw it on Velo News yesterday . Emailed Jay, suggested he clean up Mo, post flood, and maybe look at St Louie and Fergason situation for some gainful work while attached to his government teet .
|
It's obvious that it's intended to effectively ban bicycles from those roads. The impracticality is a feature.
|
I'm not from Missouri, but show me an overpass over a lettered county road. I haven't found one.
(The lettered county roads were taken over by the state in the 50s.) Utility lines crossing the road are at 18'. Collapsible fishing rods are readily available, and there are already bike mounts for them (though the bike mounts are generally designed for collapsed rods or shorter rods). Luckily, the 52 word bill makes no mention of how BIG the flag has to be, just that it has to be fluorescent orange color and visible from the rear. So, yeah. Helpful hint. Don't elect idiots. (And I trust that no matter how many idiots have been elected to the Missouri General Assembly there simply are not enough of them to pass this bill.) -mr. bill |
Originally Posted by mr_bill
(Post 18461234)
I'm not from Missouri, but show me an overpass over a lettered county road. I haven't found one.
(The lettered county roads were taken over by the state in the 50s.) Is the expectation that this is a safety apparatus that one puts on the bike when traversing some roads, then takes off the bike elsewhere? Just getting the bike into the house or garage would be a pain unless the pole is removed. Surely there would be routes that one might go on which would take a person on a variety of streets and bridges, both on a single trip, as well as general use of the bike over time. |
Originally Posted by CliffordK
(Post 18462101)
There have to be a few that go under a freeway or major arterial, or even cross a bridge with a superstructure. Covered Bridges?
Originally Posted by CliffordK
(Post 18462101)
Is the expectation that this is a safety apparatus that one puts on the bike when traversing some roads, then takes off the bike elsewhere? Just getting the bike into the house or garage would be a pain unless the pole is removed.
Originally Posted by CliffordK
(Post 18462101)
Surely there would be routes that one might go on which would take a person on a variety of streets and bridges, both on a single trip, as well as general use of the bike over time.
(All of this is moot - this bill as is will never ever pass ever.) -mr. bill |
Now, why don't they just require everyone riding bikes to fly the stars and stripes?
One the size of the Star Spangled Banner, about 30 feet by 42 feet should be sufficiently visible. |
Originally Posted by CliffordK
(Post 18462467)
Now, why don't they just require everyone riding bikes to fly the stars and stripes?
One the size of the Star Spangled Banner, about 30 feet by 42 feet should be sufficiently visible. |
Originally Posted by leicanthrope
(Post 18462574)
That would cause too much internal conflict within the heads of a certain portion of the electorate that wants to declare open season on cyclists, and the potential desecration of the flag that might occur when running them over.
|
This was posted on Facebook a day or two ago. I suggested what that fool could do with his 15 foot flag pole. There was general agreement that my suggestion was a very good idea.
BTW if I remember right, he has proposed other legislation totally against cyclist. Maybe the poor guy didnt get a bike he wanted when he was young. |
Originally Posted by rydabent
(Post 18462659)
This was posted on Facebook a day or two ago. I suggested what that fool could do with his 15 foot flag pole. There was general agreement that my suggestion was a very good idea.
BTW if I remember right, he has proposed other legislation totally against cyclist. Maybe the poor guy didnt get a bike he wanted when he was young. |
Go to the committee meeting for public comment and suggest a compromise amendment to the bill -- if a driver hits a cyclist so equipped, driver is deemed at fault, fined $10,000 - $50,000, loses license for 3-10 years, and must serve mandatory 3-10 year prison sentence.
|
Originally Posted by mr_bill
(Post 18461234)
I'm not from Missouri, but show me an overpass over a lettered county road. I haven't found one.
(The lettered county roads were taken over by the state in the 50s.) Utility lines crossing the road are at 18'. -mr. bill Around here we don't have a lot of bridges, but you'd have a problem with tree limbs. They generally keep 14' of clearance, but in my little town the sign says 13'8". |
Originally Posted by jon c.
(Post 18463747)
Around here we don't have a lot of bridges, but you'd have a problem with tree limbs. They generally keep 14' of clearance, but in my little town the sign says 13'8".
-mr. bill |
Originally Posted by dpeters11
(Post 18460800)
He apparently tried to ban cyclists on these roads, but now has moved to requiring a florescent flag a minimum of 15 feet above the ground.
https://momentummag.com/a-proposed-m...orescent-flag/ Cyclelicious » Missouri: 15 foot fluorescent flag for cyclists
Originally Posted by Chris0516
(Post 18460818)
He should stop sitting on his brains, and get on a bike.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.