Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Update on "5 cyclists killed in Kalamazoo"

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Update on "5 cyclists killed in Kalamazoo"

Old 08-31-17, 07:13 PM
  #176  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 920

Bikes: Diamond Back Apex, Mongoose IBOC Aluminum Road Bike, SR road bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 515 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 116 Posts
Thanks for the update, and I hope you continue these reports.
Here's to hoping Picket does not get away with this.
Ballenxj is offline  
Old 09-01-17, 05:49 PM
  #177  
Standard Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,249

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1293 Post(s)
Liked 929 Times in 485 Posts
Can the Michigan Supreme Court refuse to hear his case?
__________________
Pay attention. Take names. Act.
1989Pre is online now  
Old 09-01-17, 06:00 PM
  #178  
Senior Member
 
bobwysiwyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: 961' 42.28° N, 83.78° W (A2)
Posts: 2,344

Bikes: Mongoose Selous, Trek DS

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 941 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times in 189 Posts
Originally Posted by 1989Pre
Can the Michigan Supreme Court refuse to hear his case?
Yes, they can.
bobwysiwyg is offline  
Old 09-01-17, 06:05 PM
  #179  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,647

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5756 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times in 1,395 Posts
This kind of pretrial maneuvering is pretty typical in high profile cases.

For my money, the defendant can delay the trial as long as he wants, as long as he's in jail through the process. Time in before and after trial are just about the same as far as I'm concerned.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 09-09-17, 10:00 PM
  #180  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,068

Bikes: See the signature....

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 191 Times in 114 Posts
Originally Posted by canklecat
Here's an example of how Pickett's case should be handled.

"Stripper, former assistant principal, sentenced to 32 years after DUI wreck kills police officer"

Similar sad sack histories of multiple addictions, life in free-fall, enabling behaviors by those around them, trying to blame the victims.
Doubt killing 5 cyclists will amount to the same time given to someone who killed 1 LEO. It should, but its not how it works.
__________________
My bikes: '81 Trek 957, '83 Trek 720, '85 Trek 500, '85 Trek 770, '81 Merckx, '85 Centurion Cinelli, '85 Raleigh Portage, '92 RB-2, '09 Bianchi
nesteel is offline  
Old 09-10-17, 08:20 PM
  #181  
What happened?
 
Rollfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927

Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 255 Posts
Sounds more like an episode of Law And Order: SVU from the headline alone.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Rollfast is offline  
Old 09-14-17, 01:18 PM
  #182  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 920

Bikes: Diamond Back Apex, Mongoose IBOC Aluminum Road Bike, SR road bike

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 515 Post(s)
Liked 167 Times in 116 Posts
Bump to make sure this is not forgotten. Any more news?
Ballenxj is offline  
Old 09-14-17, 01:48 PM
  #183  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Ballenxj
Bump to make sure this is not forgotten. Any more news?
cb400bill is local to it, you can trust him to keep us updated.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 09-18-17, 07:42 PM
  #184  
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,625

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3084 Post(s)
Liked 6,543 Times in 3,756 Posts
Yep. I keep a close eye on info about this tragic incident.
cb400bill is offline  
Old 09-26-17, 09:04 AM
  #185  
Junior Member
 
jdoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Michigan's UP
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The 5-foot safe passing and driver’s education improvement bills are up for hearing tomorrow. There's still time to email the Senate Judiciary Committee to show your support for the bills. LMB has info and a link here:

https://www.lmb.org/index.php?option=...159&Itemid=196
jdoff is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 03:25 AM
  #186  
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,625

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3084 Post(s)
Liked 6,543 Times in 3,756 Posts
Bike bills inspired by Kalamazoo crash approved by Senate panel | MLive.com

She(Sen. Margaret O'Brien) and Sen. David Knezek, D-Dearborn Heights, introduced a package of bills designed to protect cyclists. The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the bills this morning, and are headed next to the Senate floor.
cb400bill is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 03:52 AM
  #187  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18347 Post(s)
Liked 4,497 Times in 3,344 Posts
Of course, none of these laws would have made a difference for the Kalamazoo accident.

Perhaps the one thing that would make a difference would be changing the attitude towards driving intoxicated or impaired. Perhaps reduce the legal Blood Alcohol levels... 0.05%? And make stiffer penalties for driving while intoxicated.

I'm not sure what the ideal safe passing distance is. 3 foot? 4 foot?

Personally, I think that passing anybody, bicycle, car, tractor, pedestrian, etc, should be done in a manner to not endanger other road users. I.E. not endangering the person being passed, nor oncoming vehicles on the road.

I dislike it when drivers pass 100% in the opposite lane as I think it creates greater risk for collisions due to not being able to return to one's lane in time.

I suppose the advantage with a 5 foot law is that with a 3 foot law, one can argue whether a pass was really 2'6" or 3'. With a 5 foot law, it becomes much more clearly illegal when a 2' pass is executed.

Of course, this all brings attention to multiple road users which is a good thing.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 08:15 AM
  #188  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
Perhaps the one thing that would make a difference would be changing the attitude towards driving intoxicated or impaired. Perhaps reduce the legal Blood Alcohol levels... 0.05%? And make stiffer penalties for driving while intoxicated.

I'm not sure what the ideal safe passing distance is. 3 foot? 4 foot?

Personally, I think that passing anybody, bicycle, car, tractor, pedestrian, etc, should be done in a manner to not endanger other road users. I.E. not endangering the person being passed, nor oncoming vehicles on the road.
I seriously doubt the difference between 0.05 and 0.08 will save that many lives.

As far as the passing law, I am actually against the proposal. I like Michigan's existing law, that is not enforced. It requires safe passing in general, without specifying a distance that is sure to be easily dismissed when charges are laid which are not measured out by police:
Originally Posted by https://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-257-638
257.638 Overtaking and passing on left of another vehicle; violation as civil infraction.
Sec. 638.

(1) A vehicle shall not be driven to the left side of the center of a 2-lane highway or in the center lane of a 3-lane highway in overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction unless the left side or center lane is clearly visible and is free of oncoming traffic for a sufficient distance ahead to permit the overtaking and passing to be completely made without interfering with the safe operation of a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction or the vehicle overtaken.

(2) A person who violates this section is responsible for a civil infraction.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 10:37 AM
  #189  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Personally, I think that passing anybody, bicycle, car, tractor, pedestrian, etc, should be done in a manner to not endanger other road users. I.E. not endangering the person being passed, nor oncoming vehicles on the road.
It requires safe passing in general, without specifying a distance that is sure to be easily dismissed
The problem with not specifying a distance is that mere inches suffice as a "safe pass" to some, while others require much more room... and from a cycling perspective, the mere wind from a passing vehicle can be "endangering..." but the average motorist doesn't bother to take that into consideration.

Yeah, it would be nice if the distance based laws were more "speed aware..." I have no problem with passing within inches when both parties are moving in the 20MPH range, but at 50MPH+, I want feet of separation.

"Safe pass" has been the law for decades in most states... and just has not worked well enough.
genec is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 10:55 AM
  #190  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
The problem with not specifying a distance is that mere inches suffice as a "safe pass" to some, while others require much more room... and from a cycling perspective, the mere wind from a passing vehicle can be "endangering..." but the average motorist doesn't bother to take that into consideration.
...
"Safe pass" has been the law for decades in most states... and just has not worked well enough.
The converse of that, though, is if the law says that you must leave X feet while passing, you need to prove actual passed distance if any lawyer who isn't a complete idiot is defending the accused.

In either case, if tickets are not being written now, I doubt they will be with a new law. The problem is not with the law, it is with enforcement.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 11:04 AM
  #191  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
The converse of that, though, is if the law says that you must leave X feet while passing, you need to prove actual passed distance if any lawyer who isn't a complete idiot is defending the accused.

In either case, if tickets are not being written now, I doubt they will be with a new law. The problem is not with the law, it is with enforcement.
The same can be said for a "safe pass." The simplest defense for a safe pass: "the cyclist didn't fall."

That doesn't really make the pass safe... but that is all the defense needs under a safe pass law.

Eye witnesses, photos and expert witnesses (LEOs) can all testify regarding a specific distance. ("it was certainly less than 5 feet...")

Ideally, the actual safe pass distance should be greater than the distance a cyclist could fall... (all it takes is a rock) but that is even harder to define.

And yeah, enforcement is indeed the issue... same as the proliferation of speeding violations and right on red violations.
genec is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 11:13 AM
  #192  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
And yeah, enforcement is indeed the issue... same as the proliferation of speeding violations and right on red violations.
We'll just have to agree on that point. The rest is really nitpicking and personal preference anyhow!
jefnvk is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 11:20 AM
  #193  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
We'll just have to agree on that point. The rest is really nitpicking and personal preference anyhow!
Indeed personal preference... but a specified distance is a minimum... anything less than that is enforceable. Not so with "safe passing."
genec is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 11:34 AM
  #194  
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,207

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3640 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Indeed personal preference... but a specified distance is a minimum... anything less than that is enforceable. Not so with "safe passing."
And it is as hard to enforce as speed limits without radar guns. Sure you can tell when something is obviously out of limits, but in the majority of cases you are going to have to let it go if you are just eyeing it up.

I can go back and forth on this all day

Last edited by jefnvk; 09-28-17 at 11:39 AM.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 11:50 AM
  #195  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk
And it is as hard to enforce as speed limits without radar guns. Sure you can tell when something is obviously out of limits, but in the majority of cases you are going to have to let it go if you are just eyeing it up.

I can go back and forth on this all day
Such laws give at least some sort of minimum for motorists to consider... otherwise for them, it was "didn't hit ya..."

Yeah, no point in hashing this over and over... it's been done.
genec is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 12:09 PM
  #196  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,647

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5756 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times in 1,395 Posts
May I make a Suggestion? Assuming you all said ,"of course" I will.

This thread had sussessfully stayed focused on this specific crash and the current case arising from it. I suggest, we break the thread at post 186, relating to the introduction of the laws now being discussed, and move that to a new thread.

I suggest this out of respect for the victims and those who care about that specific case. In any case, regardless of opinions about the laws now being debated, I'm sure we all agree that they would not and could not have prevented a crash like the one which is the thread was about.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 01:31 PM
  #197  
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,625

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3084 Post(s)
Liked 6,543 Times in 3,756 Posts
Hey guys. I posted a link to the story about the upcoming legislation vote because the surviving riders of the Kalamazoo tragedy were invited to speak at the voting.

In hindsight, that may have been a mistake. This is a thread about the trial of the alleged perpetrator.

Please take any discussion of the merits plus or minus of the proposed 5’ law to a new thread.

Thank you.
cb400bill is offline  
Old 09-28-17, 01:51 PM
  #198  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18347 Post(s)
Liked 4,497 Times in 3,344 Posts
Ok, I've split off a new thread related to the new Michigan legislation.

New Michigan (Kalamazoo) Bike Legislation
CliffordK is offline  
Old 09-29-17, 07:12 AM
  #199  
Junior Member
 
jdoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Michigan's UP
Posts: 108
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry for initiating the derail here, and thanks for splitting the vulnerable road user bill discussion into a new thread.
jdoff is offline  
Old 10-08-17, 07:27 AM
  #200  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
This kind of delay is a travesty because of what it does to the families involved.

We have victims and we have a killer. Why is it so complicated. The killer didnt give the victims any time at all.
rydabent is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.