Would a self driving car world make it safe for cyclists?
#2801
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,850
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times
in
985 Posts
IOW, programming for the reasonably unexpected traffic obstacles like jaywalkers and others not in compliance with the laws or the last mapping session (or the programming protocols); or AVs programmed and/or operated by jackasses?
#2802
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts

Uber has operated in jackass mode while circumventing the taxi laws of quite a few cities... why should they stop now.
Meanwhile Waymo seems to acting more the "adult" with their approach. Of course time and testing will tell.
#2803
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,673
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2209 Post(s)
Liked 2,567 Times
in
1,406 Posts
where do you get diminished capacity?? Just because someone is homeless?
And where do you get that it is ok to killed (which is what happened here) because you are homeless. A significant number of homeless work and function. True many have issues with mental health and addiction
What is scary is how many people in this country are a few events a way from homelessness. Lose a job, get injured and can't work, lose an apartment at reasonable rent etc.
The bottom line is the UBER AV systems utterly and totally failed, not even slowing down immediately before impact. Many modern, no AV cars would have stopped (Subaru Eyesite, Volvo Citisafe, etc)
Uber's failsafe driver failed not watching the road for about 8 of the 10 seconds before impact
Beyond that the video show a situation that an alert human driver could have avoided or mitigated
AV have been promoted as safer due to having greater sensor capacity than humans. In this case it AV was a fail
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#2804
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,850
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times
in
985 Posts
Google "jackassery/attitude" is off the public scrutiny hook so far as their ride-hail prototype vehicles, since they have not been operating a so-called disruptive transportation/ride-hail business (Uber), or offering their prototype AV products for sale to the public (Tesla), and maybe never will beyond the prototypes being tested on public roads.
They might bite the bullet and cut their losses on AV software development and hope to sell/lease their mapping capabilities to whatever organizations want it for their AV schemes.
#2805
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,850
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times
in
985 Posts
SF Chronicle editorial yesterday on this issue: https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/...h-12792014.php
Obviously the editors of the newspaper are not sticking with the "exclusive" story they got from the Tempe police chief and previously published.
Extract:
Obviously the editors of the newspaper are not sticking with the "exclusive" story they got from the Tempe police chief and previously published.
Extract:
"Experts have suggested that the Uber vehicle’s sensors should have spotted the pedestrian, a 49-year-old woman named Elaine Herzberg, before the vehicle struck her.
Before any new permits are issued in California, there must be a full accounting of how the technology failed in the Tempe tragedy. The company must also convince regulators that it won’t happen again.
State regulators shouldn’t limit their scrutiny to Uber, either."
State regulators shouldn’t limit their scrutiny to Uber, either."
#2806
Senior Member
what is your problem?..why the victim blaming?
where do you get diminished capacity?? Just because someone is homeless?
And where do you get that it is ok to killed (which is what happened here) because you are homeless. A significant number of homeless work and function. True many have issues with mental health and addiction
What is scary is how many people in this country are a few events a way from homelessness. Lose a job, get injured and can't work, lose an apartment at reasonable rent etc.
The bottom line is the UBER AV systems utterly and totally failed, not even slowing down immediately before impact. Many modern, no AV cars would have stopped (Subaru Eyesite, Volvo Citisafe, etc)
Uber's failsafe driver failed not watching the road for about 8 of the 10 seconds before impact
Beyond that the video show a situation that an alert human driver could have avoided or mitigated
AV have been promoted as safer due to having greater sensor capacity than humans. In this case it AV was a fail
where do you get diminished capacity?? Just because someone is homeless?
And where do you get that it is ok to killed (which is what happened here) because you are homeless. A significant number of homeless work and function. True many have issues with mental health and addiction
What is scary is how many people in this country are a few events a way from homelessness. Lose a job, get injured and can't work, lose an apartment at reasonable rent etc.
The bottom line is the UBER AV systems utterly and totally failed, not even slowing down immediately before impact. Many modern, no AV cars would have stopped (Subaru Eyesite, Volvo Citisafe, etc)
Uber's failsafe driver failed not watching the road for about 8 of the 10 seconds before impact
Beyond that the video show a situation that an alert human driver could have avoided or mitigated
AV have been promoted as safer due to having greater sensor capacity than humans. In this case it AV was a fail
Last edited by McBTC; 03-30-18 at 11:41 AM.
#2807
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
Uber has been in jackass mode for a long time when dealing with their own employees too, both in the office and driving the vehicles.
Google "jackassery/attitude" is off the public scrutiny hook so far as their ride-hail prototype vehicles, since they have not been operating a so-called disruptive transportation/ride-hail business (Uber), or offering their prototype AV products for sale to the public (Tesla), and maybe never will beyond the prototypes being tested on public roads.
They might bite the bullet and cut their losses on AV software development and hope to sell/lease their mapping capabilities to whatever organizations want it for their AV schemes.
Google "jackassery/attitude" is off the public scrutiny hook so far as their ride-hail prototype vehicles, since they have not been operating a so-called disruptive transportation/ride-hail business (Uber), or offering their prototype AV products for sale to the public (Tesla), and maybe never will beyond the prototypes being tested on public roads.
They might bite the bullet and cut their losses on AV software development and hope to sell/lease their mapping capabilities to whatever organizations want it for their AV schemes.
Uber had a difficult time going 13 miles before intervention was required.
GM is holding to their 2020 release date.
Tesla is not yet offering anything more than advanced cruise control, NOT self driving. Technically, they are not a player. Anyone trying to include Tesla in any review of AV, has not seen their warnings to drivers in the manual about "Autopilot."
Warnings — there are lots of warnings. Right from the start, whether you're looking at the owner's manual or the on-screen prompts in the car, Tesla points out that Autopilot and the subservient Autosteer programs are in beta. That means they have not been fully tested and are not considered ready for final release. There are warnings on-screen when you set up the system and warnings in the dash when you engage Autopilot.
https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/...rica_en_us.pdf
#2808
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,673
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2209 Post(s)
Liked 2,567 Times
in
1,406 Posts
No telling what their future plans are... but right now they have the best mileage/incident record... achieving 5000 miles+ before requiring intervention by a human.
Uber had a difficult time going 13 miles before intervention was required.
GM is holding to their 2020 release date.
Tesla is not yet offering anything more than advanced cruise control, NOT self driving. Technically, they are not a player. Anyone trying to include Tesla in any review of AV, has not seen their warnings to drivers in the manual about "Autopilot."
https://www.tomsguide.com/us/how-to-...view-3870.html
https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/...rica_en_us.pdf
Uber had a difficult time going 13 miles before intervention was required.
GM is holding to their 2020 release date.
Tesla is not yet offering anything more than advanced cruise control, NOT self driving. Technically, they are not a player. Anyone trying to include Tesla in any review of AV, has not seen their warnings to drivers in the manual about "Autopilot."
https://www.tomsguide.com/us/how-to-...view-3870.html
https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/...rica_en_us.pdf
and Cadillac is advertising it's no hands high way driving capability
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#2809
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,850
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times
in
985 Posts
https://www.tesla.com/autopilot
I wouldn't doubt that the Uber "safety backup driver" was also warned to keep his/her eyes on the road and be ready to take control of the vehicle operation. Didn't work in AZ for Uber, didn't work (apparently) in the the recent fiery one-car Tesla crash in California. ONLY ON ABC7NEWS.COM: Victim who died in Tesla crash had complained about auto-pilot | abc7news.com
#2810
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
Yet they are pushing it as hands off driving even as it may be involved in another tesla fatality https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/03/...out-autopilot/
and Cadillac is advertising it's no hands high way driving capability
and Cadillac is advertising it's no hands high way driving capability
Highway driving is still not "fully autonomous." I suspect Cadillac also has copious warnings and requirements for the driver.
This is yet another case of marketeers selling the sizzle.
Back in the day when I was doing smartphone designs I would often want to choke members of the marketing team for the "trash" they put forth regarding what smart phones can and cannot do... in fact, to this day, in spite of having a late model Samsung (the wife has an iphone) we still do not "dictate" messages to our phones, nor do we ask "Siri" to find stuff for us... and I chuckle at the results when friends and relatives do this on their respective smart phones. Technology to get a device to speak and understand speech is "not quite there yet." Why we assume that the skills for a computer(s) to drive a car are right around the corner just baffles me.
Oh, I think it will happen... but I suspect we are still at least a decade out.
And of course with this in mind... we are just as likely to see GM slip their AV date delivery promises too. They may put something in place and claim to meet their own deadline... but common use... is still well out. Heck there are still plenty of states that won't even allow AV use... and we know how fast law legislation isn't.
I think when we first starting discussing all this in earnest, back in '16 and '17, the speculation was that such tech was "20 years out..." That should put it into '36 or '37, not '25. Even adding 10 years to the GM claim of '25 still puts common use out until '35 at the earliest... again, providing that the laws of most states change.
Last edited by genec; 03-30-18 at 12:44 PM.
#2811
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,078
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3258 Post(s)
Liked 5,062 Times
in
2,621 Posts
It doesn't say anything about the software being capable.
I'm very cynical about Tesla's claim they can get by with only radar and cameras, and omit LIDAR.
It looks like a badly thought out cost savings.
#2812
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,673
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2209 Post(s)
Liked 2,567 Times
in
1,406 Posts
Maybe in their marketing... if you go to their website for instance, they claim to have all the sensors and features; but the manual has copious warnings about using this optional feature, and they require the driver to maintain hands on.
Highway driving is still not "fully autonomous." I suspect Cadillac also has copious warnings and requirements for the driver.
This is yet another case of marketeers selling the sizzle.
Back in the day when I was doing smartphone designs I would often want to choke members of the marketing team for the "trash" they put forth regarding what smart phones can and cannot do... in fact, to this day, in spite of having a late model Samsung (the wife has an iphone) we still do not "dictate" messages to our phones, nor do we ask "Siri" to find stuff for us... and I chuckle at the results when friends and relatives do this on their respective smart phones. Technology to get a device to speak and understand speech is "not quite there yet." Why we assume that the skills for a computer(s) to drive a car are right around the corner just baffles me.
Oh, I think it will happen... but I suspect we are still at least a decade out.
And of course with this in mind... we are just as likely to see GM slip their AV date delivery promises too. They may put something in place and claim to meet their own deadline... but common use... is still well out. Heck there are still plenty of states that won't even allow AV use... and we know how fast law legislation isn't.
I think when we first starting discussing all this in earnest, back in '16 and '17, the speculation was that such tech was "20 years out..." That should put it into '36 or '37, not '25. Even adding 10 years to the GM claim of '25 still puts common use out until '35 at the earliest... again, providing that the laws of most states change.
Highway driving is still not "fully autonomous." I suspect Cadillac also has copious warnings and requirements for the driver.
This is yet another case of marketeers selling the sizzle.
Back in the day when I was doing smartphone designs I would often want to choke members of the marketing team for the "trash" they put forth regarding what smart phones can and cannot do... in fact, to this day, in spite of having a late model Samsung (the wife has an iphone) we still do not "dictate" messages to our phones, nor do we ask "Siri" to find stuff for us... and I chuckle at the results when friends and relatives do this on their respective smart phones. Technology to get a device to speak and understand speech is "not quite there yet." Why we assume that the skills for a computer(s) to drive a car are right around the corner just baffles me.
Oh, I think it will happen... but I suspect we are still at least a decade out.
And of course with this in mind... we are just as likely to see GM slip their AV date delivery promises too. They may put something in place and claim to meet their own deadline... but common use... is still well out. Heck there are still plenty of states that won't even allow AV use... and we know how fast law legislation isn't.
I think when we first starting discussing all this in earnest, back in '16 and '17, the speculation was that such tech was "20 years out..." That should put it into '36 or '37, not '25. Even adding 10 years to the GM claim of '25 still puts common use out until '35 at the earliest... again, providing that the laws of most states change.
this video says pay attention and don't use hand held devices
this video says "Introducing Cadillac Super Cruise™, the first true hands-free driving system for the highway. Using precision LiDAR mapping data, a state-of-the-art driver attention system, and a network of camera and radar sensors, Super Cruise™ is unlike any other driver assistance system"
this one shows the driver crossing his arms after engagin
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#2813
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,850
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times
in
985 Posts
I think when we first starting discussing all this in earnest, back in '16 and '17, the speculation was that such tech was "20 years out..." That should put it into '36 or '37, not '25. Even adding 10 years to the GM claim of '25 still puts common use out until '35 at the earliest... again, providing that the laws of most states change.
Those were the good ole days of a laff-a-minute predictions based on back of the envelope calculations about the fantastic cost savings and wide appeal of ride sharing in AV vehicles.

#2814
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,078
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3258 Post(s)
Liked 5,062 Times
in
2,621 Posts
Back in the day when I was doing smartphone designs I would often want to choke members of the marketing team for the "trash" they put forth regarding what smart phones can and cannot do... in fact, to this day, in spite of having a late model Samsung (the wife has an iphone) we still do not "dictate" messages to our phones, nor do we ask "Siri" to find stuff for us... and I chuckle at the results when friends and relatives do this on their respective smart phones.
Totally clueless about technology, but he finally got a smartphone a couple years ago.
So then he thinks Siri is how you use the Internet, and keeps sending me nonsensical gibberish text messages dictated verbally to Siri.
(And the messages are usually asking me to look up something on the Internet for him.

So I keep telling him Siri is a goddamned toy, and not how real people use the Internet.
So then he would complain it was too hard to use the iPhone keypad.
So I would tell him to use a real computer.
So he would complain he didn't have one, and it was too much trouble to always go to the library to use one.
When I upgraded my Macbook last time, instead of eBaying the old one, I wiped it, did a fresh OS install, and sent it to him, (he is 1000 miles away).
So now what is his excuse for not using a computer?
Him: "I haven't charged the battery yet."

Me: "Just plug it into the goddamned wall and use it!!!"

#2815
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
Cadillac is clearly marketing it as here and usable
this video says pay attention and don't use hand held devices
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrlM02uCkvI
this video says "Introducing Cadillac Super Cruise™, the first true hands-free driving system for the highway. Using precision LiDAR mapping data, a state-of-the-art driver attention system, and a network of camera and radar sensors, Super Cruise™ is unlike any other driver assistance system"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rxW68ADldI
this one shows the driver crossing his arms after engagin
https://youtu.be/tvjf1VaH8mg
this video says pay attention and don't use hand held devices
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrlM02uCkvI
this video says "Introducing Cadillac Super Cruise™, the first true hands-free driving system for the highway. Using precision LiDAR mapping data, a state-of-the-art driver attention system, and a network of camera and radar sensors, Super Cruise™ is unlike any other driver assistance system"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rxW68ADldI
this one shows the driver crossing his arms after engagin
https://youtu.be/tvjf1VaH8mg
Sizzle... all sizzle.
Of course, this is still a rudimentary semi-autonomous system, and therefore the driver remains entirely responsible for the car's actions. That's why a small camera mounted on the steering column monitors your eyes to make sure you're paying attention. If Super Cruise makes a mistake — it didn't make a single one in my tests — the onus is on you to correct it.
BFD, you don't have to have your hands on the wheel, but you do have to have your eyes on the road. This is not yet real "autonomous driving."
#2816
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,165
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7459 Post(s)
Liked 3,143 Times
in
1,680 Posts
On another hand, Waymo is already doing fully driverless cars in Chandler, AZ.
#2817
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
The fact is that these are still prototype runs and with a limited rider pool. I understand that such rides are also available in Philadelphia and San Francisco.
It's gonna be a while before you can hail one at any airport.
I think they will eventually be common... but not for many years.
This last test/development/deploy stage will no doubt take a few more years... then a few more states will change their laws allowing AVs... test/development will continue in those new states, and under varied weather conditions... this will take a few more years. The consumer roll out will take a few years.
All in all... I'd bet 10 years pass before AVs are in common use... as even ride share vehicles.
Meanwhile collision avoidance will get better for luxury cars... and maybe Tesla and Cadillac will allow drivers to actually relax... you know, in 10 years or so.

#2818
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,165
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7459 Post(s)
Liked 3,143 Times
in
1,680 Posts
fact remains, Waymo---which Seems to be the gold standard in AV right now---is already running cars with no human driver at all on public roads.
cabs to the airport are ridiculously expensive, and cabs from the airport are notorious for ripping off out-of-town passengers. On another hand, airport pick-up/drop-off zones are ridiculousdly unsafe, with all sorts of random activity.
Pretty much.
But ... whatever. I have no money in their stocks, so whatever happens, from ubiquity tomorrow to total failure to launch, is all fine with me.
#2819
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,850
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times
in
985 Posts
IOW, is there any real information about the actual operation of these so-called fully driverless cars in AZ beyond a dreamy press release, staged video or two? We already know that the state of AZ hasn't shown much interest in what Waymo or any of the AV promoters are/or are not doing in the state or what the AV's are or are not capable of doing.
#2820
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,531 Times
in
3,157 Posts
Any information on what routes they run? How often, how far and at what speed? Can the volunteer passengers be picked up at home and taken to anywhere in Chandler, let alone anywhere beyond the specific routes freshly mapped out by Waymo in Chandler, or is it more like a trolley car running on a few specifically laid out routes and passengers have to board/disembark at stops designated by Waymo? Any way for the passengers to alter the course?
IOW, is there any real information about the actual operation of these so-called fully driverless cars in AZ beyond a dreamy press release, staged video or two? We already know that the state of AZ hasn't shown much interest in what Waymo or any of the AV promoters are/or are not doing in the state or what the AV's are or are not capable of doing.
IOW, is there any real information about the actual operation of these so-called fully driverless cars in AZ beyond a dreamy press release, staged video or two? We already know that the state of AZ hasn't shown much interest in what Waymo or any of the AV promoters are/or are not doing in the state or what the AV's are or are not capable of doing.
The FAQs are remarkably non committal...
https://waymo.com/apply/faq/
as is their location map...

Don't worry though... there are none in your area.

#2821
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,850
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times
in
985 Posts
They really are not releasing details of "How often, how far and at what speed..."
The FAQs are remarkably non committal...
https://waymo.com/apply/faq/
as is their location map...
Don't worry though... there are none in your area.
The FAQs are remarkably non committal...
https://waymo.com/apply/faq/
as is their location map...
Don't worry though... there are none in your area.

#2822
Senior Member
The selective outrage seems to be evidence of Uber derangement. The facts speak for themselves--e.g.,
Pedestrian deaths continue to rise, Arizona
ranks third highest in 2016
https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2017/...ghest-in-2016/
Pedestrian deaths continue to rise, Arizona
ranks third highest in 2016
PHOENIX – Distracted driving and walking is contributing to a 20-year high in pedestrian deaths, according to data collected in the first half of 2016 by the Governors Highway Safety Association. The preliminary report estimates that the 2016 total could rise to almost 6,000 pedestrian fatalities.
From January through June 2016, there were 2,660 pedestrian fatalities. During this time, 34 states saw increases in deaths. Arizona ranked as the third-highest state for number of fatalities per population, with 1.4 pedestrians killed per 100,000 people.
Almost 200 people were killed statewide all of last year, according to Alberto Gutier, the Arizona director of highway safety. There was an 11 percent spike in deaths nationwide over 2015, which the report attributes to a parallel increase in smartphone usage from both drivers and pedestrians.
Distracted driving is exactly what Kevin Isherwood, owner of Kevin’s Hot Dog Stand in Downtown Phoenix, sees everyday from the corner of Monroe Street and Central Avenue.
“I think most of the accidents would be caused if the pedestrians weren’t paying as much attention as they were,” Isherwood said. “It’s the drivers that are too late.”
In addition to distraction, the report cites an increase in driving because of lower gas prices, and an increase in walking for exercise as contributing factors to 2016’s fatality numbers. Though Isherwood said he wasn’t surprised by Arizona’s high fatality rates, he hasn’t seen any collisions between cars and pedestrians from his stand.
“It’s still slower speeds so I don’t know if they’d be fatalities,” Isherwood said. “But there’s a lot of close calls for hitting people all the time.”
Pedestrian deaths have been steadily climbing since 2009. According to the report, many states are increasing their efforts toward funding, awareness and education to keep people safer. Arizona is one of three states that received nearly $800,000 from the federal government to spend on initiatives to keep pedestrians safer, Gutier, said.
“It’s quite a bit of money to spend on awareness and education and enforcement on pedestrians to reduce the number of fatalities,” Gutier said.
The state will spend the $793,250 over the next 5 years, Gutier said. But as efforts are aimed toward keeping drivers less distracted, there is also an issue of distracted pedestrians.
“We have to have mutual respect,” Gutier said. “Pedestrians of vehicles in traffic and vehicles respecting pedestrians in right of way in or out of crosswalks.”
From January through June 2016, there were 2,660 pedestrian fatalities. During this time, 34 states saw increases in deaths. Arizona ranked as the third-highest state for number of fatalities per population, with 1.4 pedestrians killed per 100,000 people.
Almost 200 people were killed statewide all of last year, according to Alberto Gutier, the Arizona director of highway safety. There was an 11 percent spike in deaths nationwide over 2015, which the report attributes to a parallel increase in smartphone usage from both drivers and pedestrians.
Distracted driving is exactly what Kevin Isherwood, owner of Kevin’s Hot Dog Stand in Downtown Phoenix, sees everyday from the corner of Monroe Street and Central Avenue.
“I think most of the accidents would be caused if the pedestrians weren’t paying as much attention as they were,” Isherwood said. “It’s the drivers that are too late.”
In addition to distraction, the report cites an increase in driving because of lower gas prices, and an increase in walking for exercise as contributing factors to 2016’s fatality numbers. Though Isherwood said he wasn’t surprised by Arizona’s high fatality rates, he hasn’t seen any collisions between cars and pedestrians from his stand.
“It’s still slower speeds so I don’t know if they’d be fatalities,” Isherwood said. “But there’s a lot of close calls for hitting people all the time.”
Pedestrian deaths have been steadily climbing since 2009. According to the report, many states are increasing their efforts toward funding, awareness and education to keep people safer. Arizona is one of three states that received nearly $800,000 from the federal government to spend on initiatives to keep pedestrians safer, Gutier, said.
“It’s quite a bit of money to spend on awareness and education and enforcement on pedestrians to reduce the number of fatalities,” Gutier said.
The state will spend the $793,250 over the next 5 years, Gutier said. But as efforts are aimed toward keeping drivers less distracted, there is also an issue of distracted pedestrians.
“We have to have mutual respect,” Gutier said. “Pedestrians of vehicles in traffic and vehicles respecting pedestrians in right of way in or out of crosswalks.”
#2823
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,850
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,454 Times
in
985 Posts
The selective outrage seems to be evidence of Uber derangement. The facts speak for themselves--e.g.,
"Distracted driving is exactly what Kevin Isherwood, owner of Kevin’s Hot Dog Stand in Downtown Phoenix, sees everyday from the corner of Monroe Street and Central Avenue. “I think most of the accidents would be caused if the pedestrians weren’t paying as much attention as they were,” Isherwood said. “It’s the drivers that are too late."
"Distracted driving is exactly what Kevin Isherwood, owner of Kevin’s Hot Dog Stand in Downtown Phoenix, sees everyday from the corner of Monroe Street and Central Avenue. “I think most of the accidents would be caused if the pedestrians weren’t paying as much attention as they were,” Isherwood said. “It’s the drivers that are too late."
#2824
Senior Member
He's easier to understand (pedestrians on cell phones and drivers in a hurry) than some of the anti-technology hypocrites who don't seem to understand 6,000 pedestrians a year are casualties of their own idiocy and sh** drivers (who obviously benefited from not having a camera in their face while driving or some of them might be serving time for negligent operation).
#2825
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 8,050
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
To add to this, another Tesla driver had several warnings from Autopilot about impending danger, including one hands on warning yet did not take control of his Model X before a fatal crash...
Tesla reveals the driver killed in a Model X crash was traveling with Autopilot engaged, received 'several' automated warnings before the collision
We know that Tesla does not have any fully autonomous driving systems in their passenger vehicles, but why didn't the driver respond? Either they were not getting this or they were impaired, or worse.
Apparently nothing is really going to save you from human errors.
Tesla reveals the driver killed in a Model X crash was traveling with Autopilot engaged, received 'several' automated warnings before the collision
We know that Tesla does not have any fully autonomous driving systems in their passenger vehicles, but why didn't the driver respond? Either they were not getting this or they were impaired, or worse.
Apparently nothing is really going to save you from human errors.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.