Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Would a self driving car world make it safe for cyclists?

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Would a self driving car world make it safe for cyclists?

Old 05-19-17, 02:00 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PGH
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Ill say it again,

That giant pick up truck is not dangerous... It is the driver inside that hates people on bikes and yells expletives as he passes dangerously close and at a high speed.

That Prius is not dangerous.... Its the driver that does not realize his or her car is almost silent and sneaks up way to close to us.

That delivery truck is not dangerous.... The fatigued driver that has not noticed you yet on a busy street, and is staring at the girl on the opposite sidewalk that is about to strike you with his mirror.

Its not the 4 door sedan that is dangerous... The 16yr old driver texting a friend and driving way too fast that is about to rear end us.

So to simply answer the original question without going into the ethics of autonomous cars, or the time frame that we will see them... Yes they will be safer then human operators.

And think after a long fondo we can have a few libations at the pub, then recline the seat and let the car drive us home! ( not opening the worm hole on the subject yet)

Last edited by PoorBob; 05-19-17 at 02:25 PM.
PoorBob is offline  
Old 05-19-17, 11:35 PM
  #52  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Myosmith
Not to worry, ... or EMP and bicycles will be the only thing on the road
Originally Posted by IndianaRecRider
Works for me.
An EMP over Hawaii seems to be the biggest credible risk out of North Korea right now. But it would also mean, no BFs, serious limitations in food/water and it is a really long ways to the nearest available out of state hospital.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
CB HI is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 01:28 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
This wonderful sharing relationship however ended shortly after the 1920s when pedestrians were all but shoved off the roadway.

To expect that sort of relationship to return is pollyanna at best and delusional at worst.
My Grandfather was born in 1882, living in rural Maine things like automobiles and electricity were an extremely rare novelty until his mid 30's. It was a common theme to be reminded how lucky we are to have all these modern things.

I wounder what our outlook would be if we had that generations perspective. Maybe we're a little spoiled? Obviously there's issues to be resolved, but perhaps it's not really that bad, and we're still better off overall.

Another thing to consider is that cities were much smaller, and there were far fewer people back then.



And we don't need to be near as careful where we step......

Last edited by kickstart; 05-20-17 at 01:31 AM.
kickstart is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 04:51 AM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
Cyclist0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,811
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 184 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times in 90 Posts
Originally Posted by Mose
If only it went anywhere I wanted to go... and whenever I wanted... and I didn't have to drive an hour to the nearest station...
Good point.
Cyclist0084 is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 04:59 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
Cyclist0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,811
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 184 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times in 90 Posts
I know this is really a question for another thread, but since we're on the subject of automated cars (potentially) being safer for cyclists, who assumes the responsibility when / if a driverless car strikes and injures / kills a cyclist? The car manufacturer? The company that developed the software? Whoever owns the car? The person(s) riding in the car? All of them? None of them? Someone I haven't thought of yet?




Cyclist0084 is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 06:33 AM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PGH
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Lots of variables in that question.

Who was at fault, what were the causing factors. Did the autonomous vehicle malfunction and strike the cyclist?

If the car was at fault then the investigation would go further, in the end it would come down if there was neglect (maintenance) or a "willful" (disabling safety devices etc) act that caused the death. If its found to be willful then the responsible individual could see criminal charges.

Remember these cars will not just be tossed out on the highways without some major changes in Federal and changes to your State vehicle laws.
PoorBob is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 08:50 AM
  #57  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,841

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,452 Times in 983 Posts
Originally Posted by PoorBob
Remember these cars will not just be tossed out on the highways without some major changes in Federal and changes to your State vehicle laws.
Let's hope not. Don't forget that at least one of the major players in the promotion of self driving car schemes, Uber, has never let a concern about flaunting existing laws or regulation hinder them in tossing their product out on the highways.

Last edited by I-Like-To-Bike; 05-20-17 at 08:59 AM.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 08:51 AM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,495

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1477 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times in 434 Posts
Let's put it this way. A new grad is looking for his first job. He has $30,000 in debt. But instead of spending his time perfecting his resume, he's hung up on minimizing his taxes drawn from his retirement fund when he's 60. And he doesn't even have a retirement fund yet.

Those are the kind of problems he'd like to have when he reaches that happy place. Today he has to concentrate on getting his first job and that $30,000 debt paid.

When self-driving cars are on the road, you can be sure that the over-whelming majority of fatalities, injuries and damages will be the result of manual drivers. Regardless, the total fatalities per year will be a lot lower than the 30,000 per year the US experiences today which are all the result of human drivers. So don't let the problems we want to have stall you from making the improvements we need to make today.

There is nothing in the US Constitution saying a person has the right to drive.

Life, liberty and the right to happiness is not limited to those inside motor vehicles.

The ethical dilemma is not the perceived or imaginary right of the driver. (Motorists don't even offer that right to each other today.) It is the choice of the authorities when faced with public safety.

Last edited by Daniel4; 05-20-17 at 09:03 AM.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 10:59 AM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,009 Times in 972 Posts
The ethics are much more difficult than the technology issues and are summarized in the trolley problem.

Does the car act to save the passenger and sacrifice a bicyclist during a crash?

What if there are 2 passengers and 1 bicyclist?

What if the bicyclist is a child? A pregnant woman? 2 pregnant women inside the car vs.
3 children outside the car?

Can I pay more for driving software that favors the passengers? How much favoritism can I buy?

Thorny issues, no easy answers. These issues don't just apply to cars, they're going to be creeping into many aspects of life as things get more automated.
tyrion is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 06:48 PM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,495

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1477 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times in 434 Posts
So you are delaying the progress of mitigating the deaths of 6000 non-motorists a year because you can't decide if those lives have priority over a motorist and his passengers who will most likely suffer material damage or injury?
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 07:39 PM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by tyrion
The ethics are much more difficult than the technology issues and are summarized in the trolley problem.

Does the car act to save the passenger and sacrifice a bicyclist during a crash?

What if there are 2 passengers and 1 bicyclist?

What if the bicyclist is a child? A pregnant woman? 2 pregnant women inside the car vs.
3 children outside the car?

Can I pay more for driving software that favors the passengers? How much favoritism can I buy?

Thorny issues, no easy answers. These issues don't just apply to cars, they're going to be creeping into many aspects of life as things get more automated.
I strongly suspect that these ethical conundrums are of far more interest to philosophers and column/blog writers than they are to the people actually developing the autonomous car software. I'd think the software would just be looking for the best way to try to avoid the crash by applying brakes (& possibly throttle) and steering. If that proves insufficient then the car ends up sliding out of control and hitting whatever is unfortunate enough to be in its path. Basically the same as human drivers do today when they see that a crash is imminent. But I'm confident that the autonomous car will 1) find itself in that situation much less frequently, and 2) respond more appropriately when it does so as to avoid the crash entirely.
prathmann is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 07:52 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,009 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel4
So you are delaying the progress of mitigating the deaths of 6000 non-motorists a year because you can't decide if those lives have priority over a motorist and his passengers who will most likely suffer material damage or injury?
If that question is to me, then no, I'm not delaying anything. I'm firmly in favor of driverless cars.
tyrion is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 08:00 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada, PG BC
Posts: 3,849

Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1024 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 49 Posts
Of course self driving cars would make it safer for cyclist... once it's figured out... Until then, no. It will be more dangerous... It's just the way it is...
350htrr is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 08:30 PM
  #64  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,841

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,452 Times in 983 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
But I'm confident that the autonomous car will 1) find itself in that situation much less frequently, and 2) respond more appropriately when it does so as to avoid the crash entirely.
What, besides the hot air and pie-in-the-sky promises emanating from the salesmen and hypesters promoting their dream cars, as well as a lot wishful thinking, gives you such confidence?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 05-20-17, 09:26 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,730
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1524 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 514 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
What, besides the hot air and pie-in-the-sky promises emanating from the salesmen and hypesters promoting their dream cars, as well as a lot wishful thinking, gives you such confidence?
The science of autonomous robotics has made great strides in the last decade and there is every reason to believe significant advances to continue. The sensing and control technology in self driving cars has a lot of applications and the research is driven by many concerns outside the passenger vehicle industry. Dept. of Defense interest guarantees a strong source of continued funding. I'm confident the technology will get there in 5 to 10 years. It will likely take much longer to dominate the market for a variety of reasons, but I don't think confidence in the technology is misplaced.
jon c. is online now  
Old 05-21-17, 02:05 PM
  #66  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,841

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,452 Times in 983 Posts
Originally Posted by jon c.
The science of autonomous robotics has made great strides in the last decade and there is every reason to believe significant advances to continue. The sensing and control technology in self driving cars has a lot of applications and the research is driven by many concerns outside the passenger vehicle industry. Dept. of Defense interest guarantees a strong source of continued funding. I'm confident the technology will get there in 5 to 10 years. It will likely take much longer to dominate the market for a variety of reasons, but I don't think confidence in the technology is misplaced.
No doubt that money will be thrown at the technology, but the question is what is the source for your and others' "confidence" in drastically reduced number of fatalities and injuries anytime in the foreseeable future, other than the promoters' hyped up promises and PR flack?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 05-21-17, 02:51 PM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
tyrion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077

Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,009 Times in 972 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
No doubt that money will be thrown at the technology, but the question is what is the source for your and others' "confidence" in drastically reduced number of fatalities and injuries anytime in the foreseeable future, other than the promoters' hyped up promises and PR flack?
Mainly because computers are much less error prone than humans at this kind of thing and can process information much faster. Within certain narrowly defined activities (arithmetic, playing chess, landing rocket ships on floating barges) computers greatly outperform humans. In only a couple of years computers will be able to drive cars much, much, much better and safer than humans can.
tyrion is offline  
Old 05-21-17, 03:26 PM
  #68  
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
 
Myosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by jon c.
but I don't think confidence in the technology is misplaced.
Um, didn't a cyber ransom attack just shut down major industries, medical centers, banks and other businesses all over the world (90+ countries including the US) just a week or so ago?
Attention: We have just taken control of 10,000 Uber vehicles. Transfer $50 million in Bitcoin to this account within the next 15 minutes or your roadways will become a killing field.
Myosmith is offline  
Old 05-21-17, 09:55 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,730
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1524 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times in 514 Posts
Originally Posted by Myosmith
Um, didn't a cyber ransom attack just shut down major industries, medical centers, banks and other businesses all over the world (90+ countries including the US) just a week or so ago?
Attention: We have just taken control of 10,000 Uber vehicles. Transfer $50 million in Bitcoin to this account within the next 15 minutes or your roadways will become a killing field.
That's a different issue. The confidence in question is that the tech will develop sufficiently to allow the machines to function as desired. I have no confidence that human avarice can be defeated by technology.
jon c. is online now  
Old 05-21-17, 09:59 PM
  #70  
What happened?
 
Rollfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 8,050

Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!

Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times in 255 Posts
We'll be dead before that, and I can say that with confidence. Think thugs from A Clockwork Orange attacking these cars.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
Rollfast is offline  
Old 05-22-17, 07:15 AM
  #71  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,841

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,452 Times in 983 Posts
Originally Posted by jon c.
That's a different issue. The confidence in question is that the tech will develop sufficiently to allow the machines to function as desired. I have no confidence that human avarice can be defeated by technology.
"Function as desired" is a tall order if a principal parameter of "desire" includes significant reduction in injury/collision risk with no loss of personal mobility as being promoted by the salesmen/hypsters for the technology.

Automobiles that exist today "function as desired" unless they don't when something unexpected happens.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 05-22-17, 09:11 AM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: PGH
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
I spent many years in the Safety Field before going over to operations.

One of the first things I was taught and tried to change in the workplace is that there are no "accidents" we have incidents. Why this change in vocabulary, simply because for every event there is a cause. Things don't just happen as we like to think. All motor vehicle incidents can be traced to several causes that usually lead to a catastrophe.

From years of accident investigation I came to realize one thing, we the humans are behind incidents. The injured is not always the cause, but a break down of rule following and a general complacency leads to the majority of these events. This is very true on the highway. Road conditions, vehicle conditions still require the driver to adjust which we often do not do. Driver fatigue, impairment, inexperience will all be limited by technology soon. But the replies I see here remind me of the multiple training classes I was required to take for defensive driving. 100 % of drivers survived feel they are good drivers. If this was true we would see very few incidents? My guess is quite a few that have a negative view on this technology also drive 15-20 miles over the speed limit daily because they feel they are in total control. These are the same people that do not walk around a vehicle before backing out of a drive way, because we always know nothing is behind us??? The bottom line is daily all of us take a chance or risk when driving, when we look at our phone, change the radio station, or speed we are increasing the risk or chance of an incident. Multiply that by every other car on the road and you will see how this technology will be safer. Yes cars will still crash, but at such a major reduction in percentage.
PoorBob is offline  
Old 05-22-17, 09:20 AM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,495

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1477 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times in 434 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike

Automobiles that exist today "function as desired" unless they don't when something unexpected happens.
That's the human factor. There are no accidents. Please read PoorBob's post.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 05-22-17, 09:26 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,495

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1477 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times in 434 Posts
Originally Posted by Myosmith
Um, didn't a cyber ransom attack just shut down major industries, medical centers, banks and other businesses all over the world (90+ countries including the US) just a week or so ago?
Attention: We have just taken control of 10,000 Uber vehicles. Transfer $50 million in Bitcoin to this account within the next 15 minutes or your roadways will become a killing field.
Is this incidence enough for you to give up all your internet-dependant devices today?

Now, let's address the 90 deaths caused by human controlled motor-vehicles on the road across the US every day.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 05-22-17, 09:30 AM
  #75  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,530 Times in 3,157 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
"Function as desired" is a tall order if a principal parameter of "desire" includes significant reduction in injury/collision risk with no loss of personal mobility as being promoted by the salesmen/hypsters for the technology.

Automobiles that exist today "function as desired" unless they don't when something unexpected happens.
Indeed, the automobile DOES function as expected... the "problem" is not the automobile, it is the idiot behind the wheel that DOES NOT function as desired... as that idiot often chooses to circumvent the rules designated by society for safe cooperative use of the road. It is that idiot that the "brains" of self driving cars are attempting to replace.

Cars work fine... and we would have few "incidents" if only the rules and laws were followed.
genec is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.