Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

$920 Traffic Ticket given to Cyclist in New Orleans

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

$920 Traffic Ticket given to Cyclist in New Orleans

Old 06-28-18, 11:10 AM
  #1  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
Thread Starter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 6,855

Bikes: Surly LHT, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1053 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
$920 Traffic Ticket given to Cyclist in New Orleans

Man, this is SO up your alley here:

https://www.wwltv.com/article/news/l.../289-568018552

Nothing good can happen to you at 4:00 a.m. on the streets of New Orleans. Fo sho.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 01:33 PM
  #2  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,455

Bikes: Two-wheeled human-powered vehicles, but that's not important right now

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1057 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sure sounds like extortion. There's absolutely no way four traffic offenses should add up to a $920 ticket.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 01:56 PM
  #3  
mtb_addict 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,140
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3016 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 28 Posts
wow that sucks!
mtb_addict is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 02:10 PM
  #4  
jefnvk
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,171

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3590 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Milton Keynes View Post
Sure sounds like extortion. There's absolutely no way four traffic offenses should add up to a $920 ticket.
Absolutely no reason one should be riding a bike the wrong way down a road with no lights on at 4am, either.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 02:21 PM
  #5  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 22,375
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8523 Post(s)
Liked 82 Times in 74 Posts


LIGHTS... just makes sense. Perhaps write a law to reduce fines if one proves that they have either rechargeable lights or generator lights.

Wrong Way? It really depends on the situation. There are a couple of places where I find riding to the left (usually sidewalks) just makes sense. In one, an off street bike path ends at a traffic light with no way to activate the light to cross to the correct side of the road.

Registration? Noting the 1987 law, has a $100 minimum bike value (not really defining new vs used vs current). Inflation? Might as well argue for a JURY TRIAL based on the $20 rule from 1791. Have fines been increased since 1987 without updating the excluded values?
CliffordK is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 02:26 PM
  #6  
UniChris
Senior Member
 
UniChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 813

Bikes: 36" Unicycle

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 348 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk View Post
Absolutely no reason one should be riding a bike the wrong way down a road with no lights on at 4am, either.
Would generally agree with that. And it sounds like a lot of the ticket can be forgiven with evidence of the purchase of lights after the fact.

It could be tempting to make arguments about short distances and areas well covered by streetlights, but those arguments don't have good boundaries - they become longer distances, and riding greenways or park laps at night with nothing, etc. Besides, lights are as much or more about being seen as they are about seeing. If the distance is too short to need lights, perhaps one should walk.

The one thing that does stick out is the bicycle registration bit. That does sound a bit like one of those silly laws rarely enforced, that then gets pulled out as a habitual hammer for oppressing segments of the population.
UniChris is online now  
Old 06-28-18, 02:39 PM
  #7  
jefnvk
Senior Member
 
jefnvk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Metro Detroit/AA
Posts: 8,171

Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3590 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by UniChris View Post
Would generally agree with that. And it sounds like a lot of the ticket can be forgiven with evidence of the purchase of lights after the fact.
...
The one thing that does stick out is the bicycle registration bit.
I would agree on the bike registration bit. I'm guessing there is no visible way to know that law even exists, AFAIK most of those laws went away well before I was born around here.

And also agree on the lights would be better to be a "fix it" type deal, at least on the first offense. I blew out a headlight on my truck, literally facing a cop at a red light. Watched it pop, saw the left side go dark in front of me, and watched as the officer pulled a U-turn and pull me over. Fixed it the next day, took it in to prove it was done, and ticket dismissed.

But all in all, I don't know LA fines, but it really isn't hard for me to see how four infractions could hit that amount.
jefnvk is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 02:50 PM
  #8  
mtb_addict 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,140
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3016 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 28 Posts
I imagine this will encourage people running from the law. A bike could easily go into alleys a Crown Vic can't.
For some stupid violation, a chase is going to put the public at huge risk.
ALso is is going to increase the distrust in police by a large segment of the population.

LOoks like NO is being mismanged.

Last edited by mtb_addict; 06-28-18 at 03:26 PM.
mtb_addict is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 02:54 PM
  #9  
bikemig 
Senior Member
 
bikemig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 15,154

Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones

Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3627 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 67 Posts
And who thought that the NOPD did not have a really sick sense of humor? You know that those cops were laughing up their ass after writing these tickets.
bikemig is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 03:01 PM
  #10  
RubenAlonzo
Senior Member
 
RubenAlonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 78

Bikes: Scott Aspect 970

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bikemig View Post
And who thought that the NOPD did not have a really sick sense of humor? You know that those cops were laughing up their ass after writing these tickets.
100% with you on this.
RubenAlonzo is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 03:01 PM
  #11  
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,597
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by jefnvk View Post
Absolutely no reason one should be riding a bike the wrong way down a road with no lights on at 4am, either.
I've ridden briefly and slowly up the "wrong way" at night with no lights. It is little different than walking up a street at night - especially when there are streetlights.

This shouldn't be someone's standard commuting route, but it really isn't that drastic of an action on a sleepy residential street.
Kontact is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 03:10 PM
  #12  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
Thread Starter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 6,855

Bikes: Surly LHT, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1053 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Rumor has it that if you just say "Yes Sir" a lot and act grateful for their service to the community and show some respect, our cops stop looking for additional infractions.

"Victim #1 ": "My left brake light is out?? Oh shoot. I am so glad you noticed and I will have that attended to first thing in the morning. Man, I could have caused an accident. Thank you officer." Then take your citation for the tail light and move on.

"Victim #2 ": "Why are you stopping me? Don't you have some murder to solve or something important? What's your badge number? I know why you REALLY stopped me......."

I don't really know for sure, but I have a feeling this looks like a Victim #2 scenario. Our cops are pretty lazy about minor infractions and all the paperwork, showing up in court, etc. You gotta really try to get their goat.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 03:29 PM
  #13  
mtb_addict 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,140
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3016 Post(s)
Liked 32 Times in 28 Posts
I would hope a law enforcer would be professional, objective and fair in writing tickets, irrelavent as to the violator is nice or rude.
mtb_addict is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 03:34 PM
  #14  
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,597
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by mtb_addict View Post
I would hope a law enforcer would be professional, objective and fair in writing tickets, irrelavent as to the violator is nice or rude.
They are also people, and have the discretion to use their powers or not based on their intuition of whether the subject made an error or is likely unremorseful about violating the law.

Contrition is just as important when speaking to LE as it is when coming up for sentencing.


If you want cops to be objective, everyone is getting a ticket every time. Would you prefer that?
Kontact is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 03:47 PM
  #15  
UniChris
Senior Member
 
UniChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 813

Bikes: 36" Unicycle

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 348 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Kontact View Post
If you want cops to be objective, everyone is getting a ticket every time. Would you prefer that?
There are actually quite a few circumstances where that would be preferable.

If everyone got a ticket every time (and especially if there was always a cop there to see them), then we could expect that the number of tickets written would rapidly fall towards zero because either:
  • The risk would be too great to continue treating getting caught like bad luck
or
  • We'd change the laws to more precisely match what society actually expects
Consider something like speeding in a car or rolling through a red light on a bike. It happens, because while illegal, most of the time you get away with it, and there are often unwritten understandings of customary tolerance (5 mph over, 10 mph over..., at off hours with no one else in sight) and even many cases there's the direct pressure to do what everyone else is doing (drive with the traffic) even though it's technically illegal.

Last edited by UniChris; 06-28-18 at 03:52 PM.
UniChris is online now  
Old 06-28-18, 04:03 PM
  #16  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
Thread Starter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 6,855

Bikes: Surly LHT, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1053 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by mtb_addict View Post
I would hope a law enforcer would be professional, objective and fair in writing tickets, irrelavent as to the violator is nice or rude.
Welcome to Louisiana Third World. Just say "Yes Sir (Mam)" a lot, take your ticket, and pay it. Really, really simple.

JoeyBike is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 04:13 PM
  #17  
Paul Barnard
For The Fun of It
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 3,830

Bikes: Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 952 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times in 51 Posts
My experience with NOPD as a bicyclist is they DGAF. I run two traffic lights right by their St Louis Street sub-station on my weekend ride. There are always cops out and about around the station. I'd be willing to bet that the bicyclist got mouthy. Statistically speaking, two of the most dangerous things a bicyclist can do is ride against traffic and ride after dark without lights. The officer was well within his right to stop the bicyclist. It was a good stop. We'd want that same officer to stop a car that was similarly violating the law. We'd scream at the cop to ticket a motorist that passed too closely. But we raise hell when that officer tickets a bicyclist for two serious infractions.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 04:23 PM
  #18  
Paul Barnard
For The Fun of It
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 3,830

Bikes: Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 952 Post(s)
Liked 84 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by mtb_addict View Post
I would hope a law enforcer would be professional, objective and fair in writing tickets, irrelavent as to the violator is nice or rude.
You can hope for that all you want. I can assure you that most officers take attitude into account. For certain offenses they know when they stop you that they are going to ticket you. Other stops they exit the car with an open mind.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 04:30 PM
  #19  
UniChris
Senior Member
 
UniChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 813

Bikes: 36" Unicycle

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 348 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard View Post
I'd be willing to bet that the bicyclist got mouthy.
Or was merely black.

We really can't know about behavior or motivation, only take unfairly wild guesses from things documented to have happened in other circumstances.

Statistically speaking, two of the most dangerous things a bicyclist can do is ride against traffic and ride after dark without lights. The officer was well within his right to stop the bicyclist. It was a good stop.
Yes, though it's also a valid question how consistent they are about this. Around here, they'd have to be very bored, or specifically assigned to do so for PR purposes.

But we raise hell when that officer tickets a bicyclist for two serious infractions.
One thing that is a bit unclear is what the second three hundred dollar charge is for. The first is for wrong lane (presumably the wrong way), then second just says that "TRAFFIC LAWS APPLY TO PERSONS RIDING BICYCLES", so it's not clear what specific wrongdoing that next three hundred bucks is for. Then the lights and registration violations are listed, each around one fifty.
UniChris is online now  
Old 06-28-18, 04:36 PM
  #20  
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,597
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by UniChris View Post
There are actually quite a few circumstances where that would be preferable.

If everyone got a ticket every time (and especially if there was always a cop there to see them), then we could expect that the number of tickets written would rapidly fall towards zero because either:
  • The risk would be too great to continue treating getting caught like bad luck
or
  • We'd change the laws to more precisely match what society actually expects
Consider something like speeding in a car or rolling through a red light on a bike. It happens, because while illegal, most of the time you get away with it, and there are often unwritten understandings of customary tolerance (5 mph over, 10 mph over..., at off hours with no one else in sight) and even many cases there's the direct pressure to do what everyone else is doing (drive with the traffic) even though it's technically illegal.
And we could have strict sentencing guidelines, so when you do go to court for anything, you know you'll receive the maximum sentence regardless of the particulars.
Kontact is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 04:43 PM
  #21  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,032
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 708 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times in 16 Posts
Before I make an opinion, I'd like to know what kind of fines are issued to motorists who violate traffic laws when there are no traffic around.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 04:55 PM
  #22  
UniChris
Senior Member
 
UniChris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 813

Bikes: 36" Unicycle

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 348 Post(s)
Liked 64 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel4 View Post
Before I make an opinion, I'd like to know what kind of fines are issued to motorists who violate traffic laws when there are no traffic around.
I've never had any sense that the presence of other traffic factored into it at all, or if anything, you're more likely to get away with things in busy traffic.
UniChris is online now  
Old 06-28-18, 05:02 PM
  #23  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 22,375
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8523 Post(s)
Liked 82 Times in 74 Posts
This seems to be one of those things that a fine should be capped for an event.

So, an officer can list 20 infractions, but the fine is capped at say $200. Somehow have some wiggle room so that extreme circumstances can be dealt with outside of the limit.

Or... perhaps like sentences are often served concurrently, fines should be reduced to the most expensive fine of the set.

So, if there is a $100 fine, $200 fine, and a $300 fine, then the total would be reduced to the most expensive fine, $300, and the others would be ignored.

My guess is that the "Improper Lane Usage" was the most expensive fine, and probably applies mostly to motorists going the wrong direction on a one-way street, although in Missouri, apparently they'll cite a person for pulling from a driveway into the center lane, then merging.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 05:06 PM
  #24  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,032
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 708 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by UniChris View Post
I've never had any sense that the presence of other traffic factored into it at all, or if anything, you're more likely to get away with things in busy traffic.
The cyclists did what he did because there was nobody else around at 4am. So I'd like to know if drivers who violate traffic laws when nobody else was around would be fined the same as this cyclist.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 06-28-18, 05:13 PM
  #25  
02Giant 
Home School Valedictorian
 
02Giant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,686

Bikes: 13 Orbea Orca 02 Giant Cypress 88 Mongoose ATB

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 17 Posts
Originally Posted by mtb_addict View Post
I imagine this will encourage people running from the law. A bike could easily go into alleys a Crown Vic can't.
For some stupid violation, a chase is going to put the public at huge risk.
ALso is is going to increase the distrust in police by a large segment of the population.

LOoks like NO is being mismanged.
With the propensity of the police to be so eager to shoot someone these days, that would be risky venture.
__________________
Excuse me if I, have some place in my mind,
Where I go time to time
02Giant is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.