Licenses for E-Bikes?
#51
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
You wouldn't think so until an unlicensed driver hits you and there's no way to find him. On a bike your can rarely collide with more than one individual, and rarely serious injury or death. But with a car or larger vehicles you can cause an awful lot of damage and then drive away. Point being, its sometimes necessary in a large society, but cycling is not one of those instances.
Last edited by rydabent; 07-25-18 at 12:16 PM.
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
First, I was responding to someone who objected to the very idea of trying to tell others what they could do at all. Hence the Harley speeding through the bike lane example to demonstrate why anarchy does not work and traffic laws are needed.
Next, what is an e-bike anyway???
Or more generally, stop overlooking the fact that a powered bicycle and a motorcycle are fundamentally the same thing, only customarily differing in degree. Both Tesla and the model airplane world have proved that electric power systems can compete with fuel ones at least for short range performance, so the mere fact that something's motor is electric and not gas is irrelevant to the safety aspect of traffic laws (if anything, silent electric is more dangerous).
As a practical necessity, some sort of line has to be drawn between what is allowed to operate as a bicycle-type vehicle, and what is considered a motor vehicle, ie, traditional motorcycle.
In my hometown, that's now a distinction between pedal assist (bicycle) and any throttle system (illegal motor vehicle lacking safety systems required for moped registration)
I think this line could probably be fine-tuned, (for example speed- and acceleration- limited but inherently throttle stand up scooters would probably be good transit policy) - but the key point is that there has to be a line between what is, and isn't allowed, to operate under the special privileges and exemptions created in vehicle law for human powered bicycles.
Otherwise we're back to the Harley through the bike lane at 50 mph. Even if in the near future it's silent and electric and says Yamaha on the side.
Last edited by UniChris; 07-25-18 at 12:35 PM.
#54
Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Alabama
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm in a group chat with some friends in California and Washington and we've talked about this because it came up in their areas. Those two states are pretty high on taxes and costs anyway and are always looking for something else to hang a price tag on. The general idea (at least in my small group) is that once there is a financial benefit seen by charging money for a license for an e-bike, there’s a good chance that someone will then want to license all bikes. And who could argue it if it's for the benefit of “safety”.
Personally; I think life’s about choices. If you wreck a bike into a group of people, you should be held accountable the same as if you did it with a motorcycle or a car. Charging and inconveniencing everyone for the stupid acts of a few just seems like a lazy blanket fix that overlooks the requirements for personal accountability.
Personally; I think life’s about choices. If you wreck a bike into a group of people, you should be held accountable the same as if you did it with a motorcycle or a car. Charging and inconveniencing everyone for the stupid acts of a few just seems like a lazy blanket fix that overlooks the requirements for personal accountability.
#55
Senior Member
I'm in a group chat with some friends in California and Washington and we've talked about this because it came up in their areas. Those two states are pretty high on taxes and costs anyway and are always looking for something else to hang a price tag on. The general idea (at least in my small group) is that once there is a financial benefit seen by charging money for a license for an e-bike, there’s a good chance that someone will then want to license all bikes. And who could argue it if it's for the benefit of “safety”.
Personally; I think life’s about choices. If you wreck a bike into a group of people, you should be held accountable the same as if you did it with a motorcycle or a car. Charging and inconveniencing everyone for the stupid acts of a few just seems like a lazy blanket fix that overlooks the requirements for personal accountability.
Personally; I think life’s about choices. If you wreck a bike into a group of people, you should be held accountable the same as if you did it with a motorcycle or a car. Charging and inconveniencing everyone for the stupid acts of a few just seems like a lazy blanket fix that overlooks the requirements for personal accountability.
As for the differences between an E-Assisted bike that you must pedal, to go anywhere, and an E- bike with a throttle, that you can chose not to pedal and still go, well it's huge.IMO
#56
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
To what end? Are you going to insist that e-bike riders be tested because their bike’s top speed may technically exceed their abilities, and thus pose a danger on the MUP? What about the kidlings in their little training-wheel bikes meandering all over the path with no regard for spandex-clad racers? What about the mommies unbalanced by hauling their progeny behind them on a tag-a-long? How about those recumbent trikes. Surely they’re too wide for a bike path. Should we have regular checkpoints to enforce compliance?
So I ask again. What, precisely, do you hope to accomplish besides incommoding people for the sin of being over 50 and limited by age, physical condition, or other handicap who have the presumption to want to enjoy the MUP?
So I ask again. What, precisely, do you hope to accomplish besides incommoding people for the sin of being over 50 and limited by age, physical condition, or other handicap who have the presumption to want to enjoy the MUP?
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
So I ask again. What, precisely, do you hope to accomplish
Otherwise it's just another road, and worse one not designed with any consideration to varying traffic speeds.
besides incommoding people for the sin of being over 50 and limited by age, physical condition, or other handicap who have the presumption to want to enjoy the MUP.
Surely you see that a lack of any restrictions whatsoever does not work?
And that electric vs. gas is does not redeem what is otherwise a highway-class motorcycle, when it is now fully possible to build such with an electric motor?
Last edited by UniChris; 07-25-18 at 08:38 PM.
#58
☢
To what end? Are you going to insist that e-bike riders be tested because their bike’s top speed may technically exceed their abilities, and thus pose a danger on the MUP? What about the kidlings in their little training-wheel bikes meandering all over the path with no regard for spandex-clad racers? What about the mommies unbalanced by hauling their progeny behind them on a tag-a-long? How about those recumbent trikes. Surely they’re too wide for a bike path. Should we have regular checkpoints to enforce compliance?
So I ask again. What, precisely, do you hope to accomplish besides incommoding people for the sin of being over 50 and limited by age, physical condition, or other handicap who have the presumption to want to enjoy the MUP?
So I ask again. What, precisely, do you hope to accomplish besides incommoding people for the sin of being over 50 and limited by age, physical condition, or other handicap who have the presumption to want to enjoy the MUP?
#59
Just a person on bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,140
Bikes: 2015 Trek 1.1, 2021 Specialized Roubaix, 2022 Tern HSD S+
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times
in
56 Posts
Has it ever occurred to you that it's not just the "lazy" people who ride an e-bike for fun? I personally know people with medical issues who wouldn't be able to ride a bike without power assist. I personally know mothers who need to carry their infants around on their family e-bike. I personally know car-free people who use e-bikes to haul grocery items, tools, etc. Hardly any of them go anywhere near 20 MPH, because their purpose of riding an e-bike is to get things gone and go to places. There's nothing wrong with not 100% human powered. What's wrong is the attitude that generalizes all e-bike riders and tries to penalize them unnecessarily.
__________________
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
#60
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
"In conformance with legislation adopted by the U.S. Congress defining this category of electric-power bicycle (15 U.S.C. 2085(b)), CPSC rules stipulate that low speed electric bicycles (to include two- and three-wheel vehicles) are exempt from classification as motor vehicles providing they have fully operable pedals, an electric motor of less than 750W (1 hp), and a top motor-powered speed of less than 20 miles per hour (32 km/h) when operated by a rider weighing 170 pounds. An electric bike remaining within these specifications is subject to the CPSC consumer product regulations for a bicycle. Commercially manufactured e-bikes exceeding these power and speed limits are regulated by the federal DOT and NHTSA as motor vehicles, and must meet additional safety requirements."
If you're referring to something else, that's not an e-bike under federal (or my state's) laws.
Force equals mass times acceleration. A 170 pound person on a 50 pound e-bike traveling at the top speed of 20 mph generates less force than the same person on a 25 pound road bike zipping along at everyone's favorite Strava speed of 27 mph.
What am I missing?
#61
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The signs at all the entrances to my MUP have long said, and continue to say "no motor vehicles". If we're going to start making exceptions, then we as a society have to make some sane distinction between what we'll consider a "bicycle" (and politely overlook the assist motor) vs what we consider a "motor vehicle" aka motorcycle.
Limiting the MUP and bike lanes to compatibly human-scale movement.
Otherwise it's just another road, and worse one not designed with any consideration to varying traffic speeds.
Current policy is moving in the direction that they are welcome to do so with limited power assist, or in the handicap case, limited speed motorized wheelchairs (saw one of those in a wooded section with a pedal bike accompanying - pleased to see someone making the trip; they were going far slower than even I)
Surely you see that a lack of any restrictions whatsoever does not work?
And that electric vs. gas is does not redeem what is otherwise a highway-class motorcycle, when it is now fully possible to build such with an electric motor?
Limiting the MUP and bike lanes to compatibly human-scale movement.
Otherwise it's just another road, and worse one not designed with any consideration to varying traffic speeds.
Current policy is moving in the direction that they are welcome to do so with limited power assist, or in the handicap case, limited speed motorized wheelchairs (saw one of those in a wooded section with a pedal bike accompanying - pleased to see someone making the trip; they were going far slower than even I)
Surely you see that a lack of any restrictions whatsoever does not work?
And that electric vs. gas is does not redeem what is otherwise a highway-class motorcycle, when it is now fully possible to build such with an electric motor?
"In conformance with legislation adopted by the U.S. Congress defining this category of electric-power bicycle (15 U.S.C. 2085(b)), CPSC rules stipulate that low speed electric bicycles (to include two- and three-wheel vehicles) are exempt from classification as motor vehicles providing they have fully operable pedals, an electric motor of less than 750W (1 hp), and a top motor-powered speed of less than 20 miles per hour (32 km/h) when operated by a rider weighing 170 pounds. An electric bike remaining within these specifications is subject to the CPSC consumer product regulations for a bicycle. Commercially manufactured e-bikes exceeding these power and speed limits are regulated by the federal DOT and NHTSA as motor vehicles, and must meet additional safety requirements."
Are we talking about the same thing?
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
For usage ones, the definitions in state and local law apply. Things your link could be (mis)read to suggest are legal, are in fact not road legal in New York State and especially New York City. (To be very specific, they are legal to posses but illegal to operate).
Further, MUPs are typically treated as parks, not roadways. Localities are very much free to make rules for parks.
Last edited by UniChris; 07-26-18 at 11:36 AM.
#63
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Has it ever occurred to you that it's not just the "lazy" people who ride an e-bike for fun? I personally know people with medical issues who wouldn't be able to ride a bike without power assist. I personally know mothers who need to carry their infants around on their family e-bike. I personally know car-free people who use e-bikes to haul grocery items, tools, etc. Hardly any of them go anywhere near 20 MPH, because their purpose of riding an e-bike is to get things gone and go to places. There's nothing wrong with not 100% human powered. What's wrong is the attitude that generalizes all e-bike riders and tries to penalize them unnecessarily.
I'm usually on a Specialized Roll (due in part to my own medical issues), so you know we're not getting much beyond 15 mph with a tailwind. We've gone from just a few circles around the neighborhood to 30 mile jaunts to the Wellfleet trailhead and back. She's getting exercise, we're having fun, and life in retirement is good.
#64
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
For manufacturing purposes perhaps.
For usage ones, the definitions in state and local law apply. Things your link could be (mis)read to suggest are legal, are in fact not road legal in New York State and especially New York City.
Further, MUPs are typically treated as parks, not roadways. Localities are very much free to make rules for parks.
For usage ones, the definitions in state and local law apply. Things your link could be (mis)read to suggest are legal, are in fact not road legal in New York State and especially New York City.
Further, MUPs are typically treated as parks, not roadways. Localities are very much free to make rules for parks.
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
But that wouldn't grant MUP access.
To my understanding, pedal assist is now or will soon be permitted just about everywhere in NY state that pedal bikes are. I don't think pedal assist is the ultimately perfect dividing line, but there does need to be a distinction between human scale bicycles vs faster electric moped - 20 MPH at the squeeze of a trigger is not workable in a dense environment.
Even 20 MPH of pedal power has historically been problematic when abused, but at least that takes effort.
Last edited by UniChris; 07-26-18 at 11:47 AM.
#66
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
A moped, according to most definitions, has over twice the horsepower of an e-bike. Different animal.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
You're talking about something else.
A moped, according to most definitions, has over twice the horsepower of an e-bike. Different animal.
True light electric motorcycles sound like a great idea. They're just not bicycles and shouldn't be passed off as such.
#68
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
A federal manufacturing definition is irrelevant to MUP usage rules.
Indeed, I'm talking about the state and local laws which are actually relevant to what is and is not permitted to be operated. Anything else would be pointless.
Many of the things people are trying to pass off as bikes have more than the equivalent of a horsepower. It's the state that categorized them as illegal unregistered mopeds. That said, I'd expect electric mopeds built to comply with motor vehicle law would have a bit more power to better blend with vehicular traffic.
True light electric motorcycles sound like a great idea. They're just not bicycles and shouldn't be passed off as such.
Indeed, I'm talking about the state and local laws which are actually relevant to what is and is not permitted to be operated. Anything else would be pointless.
Many of the things people are trying to pass off as bikes have more than the equivalent of a horsepower. It's the state that categorized them as illegal unregistered mopeds. That said, I'd expect electric mopeds built to comply with motor vehicle law would have a bit more power to better blend with vehicular traffic.
True light electric motorcycles sound like a great idea. They're just not bicycles and shouldn't be passed off as such.
Happy trails!
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
You've posted over and over again about the very same motor vehicles which applicable laws in some states so categorizes, though you prefer to use a different name for them.
Those are essentially irrelevant, as they are not the definitions that apply in state laws governing operation.
It seems like you're talking about consumer product standards, not about MUPs, or bike lanes, or licensing, so it's not clear why you're still posting in this thread.
I'm talking about "low power electric bicycles" as defined by the CPSC.
If we can't agree on the subject, we can't very well continue this discussion.
Last edited by UniChris; 07-26-18 at 01:06 PM.
#70
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You've posted over and over again about the very same motor vehicles which applicable laws in some states so categorize, though you prefer to use a different name for them.
Those are essentially irrelevant, as they are not the definitions that apply in state laws governing operation.
It seems like you're talking about consumer product standards, not about MUPs, or bike lanes, or licensing, so it's not clear why you're still posting in this thread.
Those are essentially irrelevant, as they are not the definitions that apply in state laws governing operation.
It seems like you're talking about consumer product standards, not about MUPs, or bike lanes, or licensing, so it's not clear why you're still posting in this thread.
(My state is one of those which have not yet joined the modern era. The understanding that this will be addressed by the Great and General Court in due time, and in the interim, if it looks like a bicycle and observes the existing bicycle safety laws, no one is going to hassle you on the MUP or anywhere else bikes are permitted.)
So, if your argument is that e-bike riders should be licensed because e-bikes are electric motorcycles, I protest. The definition might not be fixed yet in your state, but it will be, and it will be very close to the federal definition given earlier.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
The definition might not be fixed yet in your state, but it will be
and it will be very close to the federal definition given earlier.
Pragmatically, if you want something like moderate speed pedal assist to be an option, the way to get the bulk of the (very vocal about this) non-riding population to tolerate that is not to argue "anything goes" and point to irrelevant publications form the CPSC, but to take a realistic look at what does and does not work in a city or popular path, and draw a practical line of compromise between the two.
Meanwhile, for the trips for which pedal assist is insufficient, I personally believe there should be a register-able class of light electric motorcyle for roadway-only operation. Most of the delivery usage should probably transition to these.
Last edited by UniChris; 07-26-18 at 01:19 PM.
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
I'm assuming that we are both sensible people of good will. Perhaps you have a different definition of e-bike than I do. I'm referring to what the federal Consumer Product Safety Act defines as a low speed electric bicycle.
"In conformance with legislation adopted by the U.S. Congress defining this category of electric-power bicycle (15 U.S.C. 2085(b)), CPSC rules stipulate that low speed electric bicycles (to include two- and three-wheel vehicles) are exempt from classification as motor vehicles providing they have fully operable pedals, an electric motor of less than 750W (1 hp), and a top motor-powered speed of less than 20 miles per hour (32 km/h) when operated by a rider weighing 170 pounds. An electric bike remaining within these specifications is subject to the CPSC consumer product regulations for a bicycle. Commercially manufactured e-bikes exceeding these power and speed limits are regulated by the federal DOT and NHTSA as motor vehicles, and must meet additional safety requirements."
If you're referring to something else, that's not an e-bike under federal (or my state's) laws.
Force equals mass times acceleration. A 170 pound person on a 50 pound e-bike traveling at the top speed of 20 mph generates less force than the same person on a 25 pound road bike zipping along at everyone's favorite Strava speed of 27 mph.
What am I missing?
"In conformance with legislation adopted by the U.S. Congress defining this category of electric-power bicycle (15 U.S.C. 2085(b)), CPSC rules stipulate that low speed electric bicycles (to include two- and three-wheel vehicles) are exempt from classification as motor vehicles providing they have fully operable pedals, an electric motor of less than 750W (1 hp), and a top motor-powered speed of less than 20 miles per hour (32 km/h) when operated by a rider weighing 170 pounds. An electric bike remaining within these specifications is subject to the CPSC consumer product regulations for a bicycle. Commercially manufactured e-bikes exceeding these power and speed limits are regulated by the federal DOT and NHTSA as motor vehicles, and must meet additional safety requirements."
If you're referring to something else, that's not an e-bike under federal (or my state's) laws.
Force equals mass times acceleration. A 170 pound person on a 50 pound e-bike traveling at the top speed of 20 mph generates less force than the same person on a 25 pound road bike zipping along at everyone's favorite Strava speed of 27 mph.
What am I missing?
And for what it's worth, in Massachusetts an e-bike is currently a "Motorized Bicycle."
The operator of a "Motorized Bicycle" must be 16 or over, and have a valid driver's license or learner's permit.
You can operate a "Motorized Bicycle" in a bike lane, but not on "off-street recreational bike paths."
You can't operate a "Motorized Bicycle" on roads where bicycles are prohibited.
Nothing in this year's bike bill (currently stalled in House Ways and Means) addresses e-bikes.
-mr. bill
#73
☢
I'm assuming that we are both sensible people of good will. Perhaps you have a different definition of e-bike than I do. I'm referring to what the federal Consumer Product Safety Act defines as a low speed electric bicycle.
"In conformance with legislation adopted by the U.S. Congress defining this category of electric-power bicycle (15 U.S.C. 2085(b)), CPSC rules stipulate that low speed electric bicycles (to include two- and three-wheel vehicles) are exempt from classification as motor vehicles providing they have fully operable pedals, an electric motor of less than 750W (1 hp), and a top motor-powered speed of less than 20 miles per hour (32 km/h) when operated by a rider weighing 170 pounds. An electric bike remaining within these specifications is subject to the CPSC consumer product regulations for a bicycle. Commercially manufactured e-bikes exceeding these power and speed limits are regulated by the federal DOT and NHTSA as motor vehicles, and must meet additional safety requirements."
If you're referring to something else, that's not an e-bike under federal (or my state's) laws.
Force equals mass times acceleration. A 170 pound person on a 50 pound e-bike traveling at the top speed of 20 mph generates less force than the same person on a 25 pound road bike zipping along at everyone's favorite Strava speed of 27 mph.
What am I missing?
"In conformance with legislation adopted by the U.S. Congress defining this category of electric-power bicycle (15 U.S.C. 2085(b)), CPSC rules stipulate that low speed electric bicycles (to include two- and three-wheel vehicles) are exempt from classification as motor vehicles providing they have fully operable pedals, an electric motor of less than 750W (1 hp), and a top motor-powered speed of less than 20 miles per hour (32 km/h) when operated by a rider weighing 170 pounds. An electric bike remaining within these specifications is subject to the CPSC consumer product regulations for a bicycle. Commercially manufactured e-bikes exceeding these power and speed limits are regulated by the federal DOT and NHTSA as motor vehicles, and must meet additional safety requirements."
If you're referring to something else, that's not an e-bike under federal (or my state's) laws.
Force equals mass times acceleration. A 170 pound person on a 50 pound e-bike traveling at the top speed of 20 mph generates less force than the same person on a 25 pound road bike zipping along at everyone's favorite Strava speed of 27 mph.
What am I missing?
#74
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
My argument is that electric motorcycles should be licensed. That you chose to mis-label them as "bikes" doesn't change the fact of what they functionally are - a determination my state's DOT happens to agree with.
It already is fixed here. Specifically in a way that fits our traffic conditions.
If you saw what was actually happening on the streets with grossly improper operation of the illegal ones, you'd be less confident that things will go in the direction you want.
Pragmatically, if you want something like moderate speed pedal assist to be an option, the way to get the bulk of the (very vocal about this) non-riding population to tolerate that is not to argue "anything goes" and point to irrelevant publications form the CPSC, but to take a realistic look at what does and does not work in a city or popular path, and draw a practical line of compromise between the two.
Meanwhile, for the trips for which pedal assist is insufficient, I personally believe there should be a register-able class of light electric motorcyle for roadway-only operation. Most of the delivery usage should probably transition to these.
It already is fixed here. Specifically in a way that fits our traffic conditions.
If you saw what was actually happening on the streets with grossly improper operation of the illegal ones, you'd be less confident that things will go in the direction you want.
Pragmatically, if you want something like moderate speed pedal assist to be an option, the way to get the bulk of the (very vocal about this) non-riding population to tolerate that is not to argue "anything goes" and point to irrelevant publications form the CPSC, but to take a realistic look at what does and does not work in a city or popular path, and draw a practical line of compromise between the two.
Meanwhile, for the trips for which pedal assist is insufficient, I personally believe there should be a register-able class of light electric motorcyle for roadway-only operation. Most of the delivery usage should probably transition to these.
Assuming you are in New York, the law is most certainly NOT fixed. Please see NY Senate Bill 6029B, currently in committee.
It defines an "Electric Assisted Bicycle" pretty much as stated above. Further, it requires that the bicycle comply with the USCPSC definition above.
As far as scooters, limited use motorcycles, etc. that's a different can o' worms that the bill clearly differentiates.
#75
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brewster, MA
Posts: 161
Bikes: Bianchi Boardwalk, Specialized Roubaix, Dahon Speed D7, Specialized Roll Elite, Pedego City Commuter Platinum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
BTW, what you are looking for is "p = mv" not "f = ma." (Acceleration is 0 in your above scenario, you know, an object in motion stays in motion, no "f" required.)
And for what it's worth, in Massachusetts an e-bike is currently a "Motorized Bicycle."
The operator of a "Motorized Bicycle" must be 16 or over, and have a valid driver's license or learner's permit.
You can operate a "Motorized Bicycle" in a bike lane, but not on "off-street recreational bike paths."
You can't operate a "Motorized Bicycle" on roads where bicycles are prohibited.
Nothing in this year's bike bill (currently stalled in House Ways and Means) addresses e-bikes.
-mr. bill
And for what it's worth, in Massachusetts an e-bike is currently a "Motorized Bicycle."
The operator of a "Motorized Bicycle" must be 16 or over, and have a valid driver's license or learner's permit.
You can operate a "Motorized Bicycle" in a bike lane, but not on "off-street recreational bike paths."
You can't operate a "Motorized Bicycle" on roads where bicycles are prohibited.
Nothing in this year's bike bill (currently stalled in House Ways and Means) addresses e-bikes.
-mr. bill
As I mentioned in my conversation with UniChris above, the current standard in Massachusetts (as opposed to the letter of the archaic law) is that if it looks like a bicycle and existing bicycle safety laws are observed, no one is going to hassle you on any road or MUP. This is certainly the case in my neighborhood, where local bike rental spots abound and most are discovering e-bikes.
I'm out on the MUP nearly every day. The fastest vehicles by far are ordinary road bikes being ridden by younger people in full spandex kit, and I have no problem with 'em (save perhaps envy). On any given day, I'll usually see two or three e-bikes, traveling at about the same rate of speed I am. The two things they all have in common is that the riders are at least my age, and they're all smiling.
Massachusetts law will catch up. E-bikes are dropping in price and you're seeing more mainstream bike makers (Trek, Specialized, etc.) coming out with electric assist models.