Hummer hits cyclist, gets out to look, leaves
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Hummer hits cyclist, gets out to look, leaves
October 15 in Aurora, CO https://denver.cbslocal.com/2020/10/...cyclist-leaves
Apparently just made the news.
Apparently just made the news.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,921
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2259 Post(s)
Liked 1,680 Times
in
921 Posts
He probably had important stuff to do in his urban assault vehicle. I'm just going to watch this thread and wait for all the people blaming the cyclist for the accident for riding in the crosswalk.
Likes For Milton Keynes:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 779
Bikes: 2017 Co-op ADV 1.1; ~1991 Novara Arriba; 1990 Fuji Palisade; mid-90's Moots Tandem; 1985 Performance Superbe
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 493 Times
in
288 Posts
For those of you in Texas: Though there is an effort underway to change the law (which I support), I understand that if you are riding on a crosswalk (as in this video) and are hit, the driver cannot be charged. They can only be charged if you are a pedestrian.
Dunno what the law is in CO.
Even if this happened in TX, it would still be a hit-and-run as there was failure to notify and render aid. (I had to look it up.)
From the Texas Transportation Code: SUBCHAPTER B. DUTIES FOLLOWING ACCIDENT Sec. 550.021. ACCIDENT INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
(a) The operator of a vehicle involved in an accident that results or is reasonably likely to result in injury to or death of a person shall:
(1) immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident or as close to the scene as possible;
(2) immediately return to the scene of the accident if the vehicle is not stopped at the scene of the accident;
(3) immediately determine whether a person is involved in the accident, and if a person is involved in the accident, whether that person requires aid; and
(4) remain at the scene of the accident until the operator complies with the requirements of Section 550.023. (DUTY TO GIVE INFORMATION AND RENDER AID)
Dunno what the law is in CO.
Even if this happened in TX, it would still be a hit-and-run as there was failure to notify and render aid. (I had to look it up.)
From the Texas Transportation Code: SUBCHAPTER B. DUTIES FOLLOWING ACCIDENT Sec. 550.021. ACCIDENT INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
(a) The operator of a vehicle involved in an accident that results or is reasonably likely to result in injury to or death of a person shall:
(1) immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident or as close to the scene as possible;
(2) immediately return to the scene of the accident if the vehicle is not stopped at the scene of the accident;
(3) immediately determine whether a person is involved in the accident, and if a person is involved in the accident, whether that person requires aid; and
(4) remain at the scene of the accident until the operator complies with the requirements of Section 550.023. (DUTY TO GIVE INFORMATION AND RENDER AID)
Last edited by flangehead; 10-29-20 at 08:43 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 779
Bikes: 2017 Co-op ADV 1.1; ~1991 Novara Arriba; 1990 Fuji Palisade; mid-90's Moots Tandem; 1985 Performance Superbe
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 493 Times
in
288 Posts
People know what "defensive driving" is, but the same general principles apply to all road users.
Two defensive drivers go into a bar. Nothing happens.
One defensive driver goes into a bar with an careless driver. Nothing happens.
Two careless drivers go into a bar...
I'm trying to work out a punchline. Any suggestions?
Likes For billridesbikes:
#6
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 1,053 Times
in
628 Posts
Gosh, wouldn't want you to be disappointed..
People know what "defensive driving" is, but the same general principles apply to all road users.
Two defensive drivers go into a bar. Nothing happens.
One defensive driver goes into a bar with an careless driver. Nothing happens.
Two careless drivers go into a bar...
I'm trying to work out a punchline. Any suggestions?
People know what "defensive driving" is, but the same general principles apply to all road users.
Two defensive drivers go into a bar. Nothing happens.
One defensive driver goes into a bar with an careless driver. Nothing happens.
Two careless drivers go into a bar...
I'm trying to work out a punchline. Any suggestions?
I just pray that this face is not the last thing I ever see on this earth. But in the meantime, I will take care to avoid riding in crosswalks at night.

"uh oh, I'm in big trouble now. my insurance is gonna go WAY up."
#7
Knurled Nut
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 14,869
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7835 Post(s)
Liked 8,373 Times
in
4,679 Posts
For those of you in Texas: Though there is an effort underway to change the law (which I support), I understand that if you are riding on a crosswalk (as in this video) and are hit, the driver cannot be charged. They can only be charged if you are a pedestrian.
Dunno what the law is in CO.
Even if this happened in TX, it would still be a hit-and-run as there was failure to notify and render aid. (I had to look it up.)
From the Texas Transportation Code: SUBCHAPTER B. DUTIES FOLLOWING ACCIDENT Sec. 550.021. ACCIDENT INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
(a) The operator of a vehicle involved in an accident that results or is reasonably likely to result in injury to or death of a person shall:
(1) immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident or as close to the scene as possible;
(2) immediately return to the scene of the accident if the vehicle is not stopped at the scene of the accident;
(3) immediately determine whether a person is involved in the accident, and if a person is involved in the accident, whether that person requires aid; and
(4) remain at the scene of the accident until the operator complies with the requirements of Section 550.023. (DUTY TO GIVE INFORMATION AND RENDER AID)
Dunno what the law is in CO.
Even if this happened in TX, it would still be a hit-and-run as there was failure to notify and render aid. (I had to look it up.)
From the Texas Transportation Code: SUBCHAPTER B. DUTIES FOLLOWING ACCIDENT Sec. 550.021. ACCIDENT INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY OR DEATH.
(a) The operator of a vehicle involved in an accident that results or is reasonably likely to result in injury to or death of a person shall:
(1) immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the accident or as close to the scene as possible;
(2) immediately return to the scene of the accident if the vehicle is not stopped at the scene of the accident;
(3) immediately determine whether a person is involved in the accident, and if a person is involved in the accident, whether that person requires aid; and
(4) remain at the scene of the accident until the operator complies with the requirements of Section 550.023. (DUTY TO GIVE INFORMATION AND RENDER AID)
No law against riding in crosswalks in Colorado statutory law or Aurora ordinances. Colorado statute reads:
- A person riding a bicycle or electrical assisted bicycle upon and along a sidewalk or pathway or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal before overtaking and passing such pedestrian. A person riding a bicycle in a crosswalk shall do so in a manner that is safe for pedestrians.
- A person shall not ride a bicycle or electrical assisted bicycle upon and along a sidewalk or pathway or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk where such use of bicycles or electrical assisted bicycles is prohibited by official traffic control devices or local ordinances. A person riding a bicycle or electrical assisted bicycle shall dismount before entering any crosswalk where required by official traffic control devices or local ordinances.
- A person riding or walking a bicycle or electrical assisted bicycle upon and along a sidewalk or pathway or across a roadway upon and along a crosswalk shall have all the rights and duties applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances, including, but not limited to, the rights and duties granted and required by section 42-4-802.
As there is no ordinance in Aurora forbidding bikes in crosswalks (I checked), it doesn't appear that #2 applies unless there was a sign indicating no bikes in that particular crosswalk. I seriously doubt that was the case.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 779
Bikes: 2017 Co-op ADV 1.1; ~1991 Novara Arriba; 1990 Fuji Palisade; mid-90's Moots Tandem; 1985 Performance Superbe
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 337 Post(s)
Liked 493 Times
in
288 Posts
Probably no one, but it is a crack in the transportation code, so the Texas Legislature owns it. I met a cyclist who was hit in a crosswalk and the driver who attempted a right turn on red was not charged. I presume it is because she was not a pedestrian.
The right-of-way at crosswalks is addressed in Chapter 552 and it is all about pedestrians. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/D...htm/TN.552.htm
However, "(3) "Pedestrian" means a person on foot." https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/D...htm/TN.541.htm
.. and they gotcha on the technicality...
Thanks for asking; the legislature will convene next year and I need to reconnect with the people pushing to change the law. Good reminder.
But at the end of the day, it really isn't about whether a motorist is charged with a misdemeanor. It is really about no one getting hurt. The Venn diagram of laws and safety only have a partial overlap..
The right-of-way at crosswalks is addressed in Chapter 552 and it is all about pedestrians. https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/D...htm/TN.552.htm
However, "(3) "Pedestrian" means a person on foot." https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/D...htm/TN.541.htm
.. and they gotcha on the technicality...
Thanks for asking; the legislature will convene next year and I need to reconnect with the people pushing to change the law. Good reminder.
But at the end of the day, it really isn't about whether a motorist is charged with a misdemeanor. It is really about no one getting hurt. The Venn diagram of laws and safety only have a partial overlap..
Last edited by flangehead; 10-29-20 at 11:03 AM. Reason: clarify collision situation and real safety
Likes For flangehead:
#9
more daylight today!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 12,484
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5113 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times
in
2,506 Posts
Whether motorist, cyclist, runner, walker or whomever. A person involved in an accident whether at fault or not and leaves the scene without rendering aid or exchanging any information that might be required is scum. I'd hope that such persons get the more severe side of the laws for that jurisdiction.
Likes For Iride01:
#10
Jazz Aficionado
He'll hopefully get caught and pay the price. I know that intersection, frankly, all over the Front Range here in Colorado, there are so many bike and motorcycle accidents, mostly perpetuated by moronic, drunk, stoned, texting drivers, it's pathetic! In all my many years living here, I'm actually fearful of riding, and I'm usually not to afraid of most things.
#11
Cycle Year Round
Anyone here still not see the point of video recording your rides. The drivers insurance will have a very hard fight if they try to deny the cyclist claim. Driver will likely be caught this time and has some good evidence against him.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Likes For CB HI:
#12
Senior Member
I would not be at all surprised if the defense of that man in the photo was to deny it was he who ran over the cyclist.
Here are two examples where the argument against camera footage seems incredible:
1)The defense of Gregory and Travis McMichael (accused of the killing of Ahmaud Arbery) was that they were being attacked by Arbery. Their lawyer said the 30sec of video did not tell the whole story what happened before.
2) The security guard whose body camera recorded his two hands pushing Raptors President, Masai Ujiri, right after the 2019 NBA championship game ended claimed it was Masai who pushed him.
Here are two examples where the argument against camera footage seems incredible:
1)The defense of Gregory and Travis McMichael (accused of the killing of Ahmaud Arbery) was that they were being attacked by Arbery. Their lawyer said the 30sec of video did not tell the whole story what happened before.
2) The security guard whose body camera recorded his two hands pushing Raptors President, Masai Ujiri, right after the 2019 NBA championship game ended claimed it was Masai who pushed him.
Last edited by Daniel4; 10-31-20 at 08:43 PM.
#14
Junior Member
I hope the cyclist victim may recover, and that the suspect hit-and-run driver may be identified and held accountable.
Last edited by dragoonO1; 11-03-20 at 04:07 PM.
Likes For Milton Keynes:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,604
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 624 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
415 Posts
Anybody here live in the area? Know if there are any updates? The original story hasn't been updated.

Likes For Notso_fastLane:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,169
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1059 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times
in
177 Posts
Cyclist couldn't figure out what's going on right in front of him?? WTF.
Plus it's night. DEFENSIVE riding is compulsory. TMO.
Plus it's night. DEFENSIVE riding is compulsory. TMO.
Likes For GamblerGORD53:
#18
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 1,053 Times
in
628 Posts
I agree, but people will get get mad here if you point out anything wrong the victim, and this was a victim, may have done.
As a driver I have close calls all the time with people doing dumb stuff on bikes, esp at night, mostly salmoning and riding on sidewalks, ignoring traffic lights, etc. I don't really agree with the philosophy that a bike should be treated like a pedestrian whenever it happens to suit the rider. Nervous inexperienced riders do stuff like that all the time, thinking it's safer, but it's NOT! It's much more dangerous to be riding someplace where cars don't expect you to be.
As a driver I have close calls all the time with people doing dumb stuff on bikes, esp at night, mostly salmoning and riding on sidewalks, ignoring traffic lights, etc. I don't really agree with the philosophy that a bike should be treated like a pedestrian whenever it happens to suit the rider. Nervous inexperienced riders do stuff like that all the time, thinking it's safer, but it's NOT! It's much more dangerous to be riding someplace where cars don't expect you to be.
Likes For Lemond1985:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,604
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 624 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
415 Posts
I agree, but people will get get mad here if you point out anything wrong the victim, and this was a victim, may have done.
As a driver I have close calls all the time with people doing dumb stuff on bikes, esp at night, mostly salmoning and riding on sidewalks, ignoring traffic lights, etc. I don't really agree with the philosophy that a bike should be treated like a pedestrian whenever it happens to suit the rider. Nervous inexperienced riders do stuff like that all the time, thinking it's safer, but it's NOT! It's much more dangerous to be riding someplace where cars don't expect you to be.
As a driver I have close calls all the time with people doing dumb stuff on bikes, esp at night, mostly salmoning and riding on sidewalks, ignoring traffic lights, etc. I don't really agree with the philosophy that a bike should be treated like a pedestrian whenever it happens to suit the rider. Nervous inexperienced riders do stuff like that all the time, thinking it's safer, but it's NOT! It's much more dangerous to be riding someplace where cars don't expect you to be.
However, even if the cyclist was at fault, this driver got out, looked at the rider on the ground, then got back in his vehicle an left. If he had stuck around, he might have been able to convince the LEO that it was the cyclists fault, and looking at the video, it might be, but now, he's left the scene of an accident which is a bigger crime, and stupid.
Likes For Notso_fastLane:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: In the south but from North
Posts: 636
Bikes: Turner 5-Spot Burner converted; IBIS Ripley, Specialized Crave, Tommasini Sintesi, Cinelli Superstar, Tommasini X-Fire Gravel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 370 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
189 Posts
I would not be at all surprised if the defense of that man in the photo was to deny it was he who ran over the cyclist.
Here are two examples where the argument against camera footage seems incredible:
1)The defense of Gregory and Travis McMichael (accused of the killing of Ahmaud Arbery) was that they were being attacked by Arbery. Their lawyer said the 30sec of video did not tell the whole story what happened before.
2) The security guard whose body camera recorded his two hands pushing Raptors President, Masai Ujiri, right after the 2019 NBA championship game ended claimed it was Masai who pushed him.
Here are two examples where the argument against camera footage seems incredible:
1)The defense of Gregory and Travis McMichael (accused of the killing of Ahmaud Arbery) was that they were being attacked by Arbery. Their lawyer said the 30sec of video did not tell the whole story what happened before.
2) The security guard whose body camera recorded his two hands pushing Raptors President, Masai Ujiri, right after the 2019 NBA championship game ended claimed it was Masai who pushed him.
Likes For vespasianus:
#21
The dropped
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,329
Bikes: Pake C'Mute Touring/Commuter Build, 1989 Kona Cinder Cone, 1995 Trek 5200, 1973 Raleigh Super Course FG, 1960/61 Montgomery Ward Hawthorne "thrift" 3 speed, by Hercules : 1966 Schwinn Deluxe Racer (sold)
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1685 Post(s)
Liked 954 Times
in
657 Posts
Unfortunately, my experience tells me that you're not too far off.
If I'm riding in full kit on a 'serious' bike, I seem to get more room from drivers than when I'm JRA on my cherished Schwinn Deluxe Racer in street clothes. My speeds aren't significantly different from the drivers' POV regardless of what I'm riding, nor are my lights. The biggest cues would be clothing and posture, and I believe that the more I look like a bum and less like a person with moderate disposable income, the less considerate the drivers will be.
If I'm riding in full kit on a 'serious' bike, I seem to get more room from drivers than when I'm JRA on my cherished Schwinn Deluxe Racer in street clothes. My speeds aren't significantly different from the drivers' POV regardless of what I'm riding, nor are my lights. The biggest cues would be clothing and posture, and I believe that the more I look like a bum and less like a person with moderate disposable income, the less considerate the drivers will be.
Likes For Unca_Sam:
#23
he said member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: is everything
Posts: 12,708
Bikes: yes please
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2282 Post(s)
Liked 1,570 Times
in
944 Posts
Gosh, wouldn't want you to be disappointed..
People know what "defensive driving" is, but the same general principles apply to all road users.
Two defensive drivers go into a bar. Nothing happens.
One defensive driver goes into a bar with an careless driver. Nothing happens.
Two careless drivers go into a bar...
I'm trying to work out a punchline. Any suggestions?
People know what "defensive driving" is, but the same general principles apply to all road users.
Two defensive drivers go into a bar. Nothing happens.
One defensive driver goes into a bar with an careless driver. Nothing happens.
Two careless drivers go into a bar...
I'm trying to work out a punchline. Any suggestions?
#24
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 356 Post(s)
Liked 308 Times
in
221 Posts
I agree, but people will get get mad here if you point out anything wrong the victim, and this was a victim, may have done.
As a driver I have close calls all the time with people doing dumb stuff on bikes, esp at night, mostly salmoning and riding on sidewalks, ignoring traffic lights, etc. I don't really agree with the philosophy that a bike should be treated like a pedestrian whenever it happens to suit the rider. Nervous inexperienced riders do stuff like that all the time, thinking it's safer, but it's NOT! It's much more dangerous to be riding someplace where cars don't expect you to be.
As a driver I have close calls all the time with people doing dumb stuff on bikes, esp at night, mostly salmoning and riding on sidewalks, ignoring traffic lights, etc. I don't really agree with the philosophy that a bike should be treated like a pedestrian whenever it happens to suit the rider. Nervous inexperienced riders do stuff like that all the time, thinking it's safer, but it's NOT! It's much more dangerous to be riding someplace where cars don't expect you to be.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,805
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3234 Post(s)
Liked 998 Times
in
599 Posts
Does anyone know if he has been arrested?
With the absolutely clear picture of the driver, I find it amazing that he has not been found or turn in!!!!
With the absolutely clear picture of the driver, I find it amazing that he has not been found or turn in!!!!
Last edited by rydabent; 12-30-20 at 09:54 AM.