Paint bike lanes, or pave them?
#1
Happy banana slug
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Posts: 3,286
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 261, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1302 Post(s)
Liked 1,138 Times
in
701 Posts
Paint bike lanes, or pave them?
Interesting article. The comments are also interesting.
https://sf.streetsblog.org/2021/03/0...#disqus_thread
https://sf.streetsblog.org/2021/03/0...#disqus_thread
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,604
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 624 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
415 Posts
When I lived in Germany, all of the bike lanes there (city of Hamburg) were different color pavement, some were actual brick. They had very good infrastructure for biking, which combined with the widespread public transportation, made it so I never even rented a car (I lived there for 16 months).
I would love to see that kind of infrastructure here.
I would love to see that kind of infrastructure here.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 972
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 412 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 263 Times
in
172 Posts
No bike lanes! Vehicular Cycling.
Likes For Rick:
#5
Senior Member
Protected bike lines provide an incentive for more people to get out of their cars and ride. Those are the people who just can't ride in traffic with cars and trucks there. So regardless of what you think of them, I would welcome them into the bike lane, on their bikes.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 972
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 412 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 263 Times
in
172 Posts
Not necessarily. My comfortable ride is 15 km/hr. I can go faster of I'm in front of a car but no way would I be able to reach 50 km/hr or faster unless I'm rolling down a hill. So if I'm not in a bike lane, I will be slowing down traffic - unless there are no cars.
Protected bike lines provide an incentive for more people to get out of their cars and ride. Those are the people who just can't ride in traffic with cars and trucks there. So regardless of what you think of them, I would welcome them into the bike lane, on their bikes.
#7
Knurled Nut
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 14,899
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7848 Post(s)
Liked 8,412 Times
in
4,700 Posts
There's a subforum for that debate. It does not belong here by rule.
This thread is not about whether or not there should be bike lanes, it's about how they should be marked. Don't hijack it into the vc subforum.
Last edited by livedarklions; 05-03-21 at 05:28 AM.
#8
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 2,863 Times
in
1,970 Posts
I think the color is less important than segregation. Color the asphalt or paint it, there is no effect if people can easily drive their vehicles on the bike lane.
It's good to see VC is still alive in the hearts of a vanishingly small population of cyclists. But it does seem like trolling in this thread.
It's good to see VC is still alive in the hearts of a vanishingly small population of cyclists. But it does seem like trolling in this thread.
Likes For unterhausen:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,822
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 623 Times
in
399 Posts
My view is that we're a long way off from when the color of bike lanes will matter. We're still just figuring out how to design our cities to make driving a car safer, much less riding a bike. Even in places with bike lanes, we still have to adapt to our surroundings. No cyclist who has survived for more than five minutes is likely to be confused when a bike lane ends or merges into traffic at intersections. Perhaps in places where dangerous intersections are the exception rather than the rule, some additional markings would be beneficial.
A good use for the colored paths is to warn pedestrians that they're about to walk across a bike thoroughfare.
As a practical aside, I suspect that the layer of colored asphalt is likely to spall off in regions with a hard winter. It might not be any more durable than paint.
A good use for the colored paths is to warn pedestrians that they're about to walk across a bike thoroughfare.
As a practical aside, I suspect that the layer of colored asphalt is likely to spall off in regions with a hard winter. It might not be any more durable than paint.
#11
Knurled Nut
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 14,899
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7848 Post(s)
Liked 8,412 Times
in
4,700 Posts
#12
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 23,325
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 2,863 Times
in
1,970 Posts
Cities have been designed around parking and car traffic throughput for a very long time. It's not working. The huge streets needed for car traffic at rush hour encourage speeding and reckless driving, and the results speak for themselves. In a lot of cities, the majority of people that live there don't have a car, and those that do leave them parked most of the time. That's the advantage of a city. And so for some reason, the transportation is mostly designed for people that don't live there. It's upside-down way of doing things, and it's slowly changing. Or in the case of Paris, it's rapidly changing.
Likes For unterhausen:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 972
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 412 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 263 Times
in
172 Posts
Cities have been designed around parking and car traffic throughput for a very long time. It's not working. The huge streets needed for car traffic at rush hour encourage speeding and reckless driving, and the results speak for themselves. In a lot of cities, the majority of people that live there don't have a car, and those that do leave them parked most of the time. That's the advantage of a city. And so for some reason, the transportation is mostly designed for people that don't live there. It's upside-down way of doing things, and it's slowly changing. Or in the case of Paris, it's rapidly changing.
Likes For Rick:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,822
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 623 Times
in
399 Posts
Cities have been designed around parking and car traffic throughput for a very long time. It's not working. The huge streets needed for car traffic at rush hour encourage speeding and reckless driving, and the results speak for themselves. In a lot of cities, the majority of people that live there don't have a car, and those that do leave them parked most of the time. That's the advantage of a city. And so for some reason, the transportation is mostly designed for people that don't live there. It's upside-down way of doing things, and it's slowly changing. Or in the case of Paris, it's rapidly changing.
However, because there are still residential neighborhoods extending almost all the way into the downtown area, a major portion of our "bike infrastructure" is simply the residential streets, which have barely any traffic. The need for bike paths and lanes is simply to deal with the areas where there are no such streets, including some traffic bottlenecks due to the number of lakes that the city is built around.
There is a parking shortage downtown, which encourages people to take the bus. But it's not enough. A lot of employers subsidize the parking. Interestingly, the university does not, and so most of the uni employees have found alternative ways to commute.
It seems that the city is being pretty smart about adding bike lanes. They wait until a street or intersection has to be rebuilt anyway. A lot of rebuilding is going on because the underground infrastructure is reaching end of life. For instance my street needed new sewer and gas lines, but when they rebuilt it, they turned it into a marked bike boulevard. We don't follow the apparently widespread practice of painting a stripe in some arbitrary location and declaring it to be a bike lane.
#16
Fxxxxr
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: falfurrias texas
Posts: 955
Bikes: wabi classic (stolen & recovered)
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2641 Post(s)
Liked 1,121 Times
in
849 Posts
Bike Lanes should be demarcated by signs and paint > bicyclists get injured in bike lanes because motorists routinely use bike lanes as a drivable shoulder ............... there should be a moving violation offense for vehicles crossing into a bike lane
__________________
Nothing is true---everything is permitted
Nothing is true---everything is permitted
#17
Knurled Nut
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 14,899
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7848 Post(s)
Liked 8,412 Times
in
4,700 Posts
I live in Madison WI, which is about 250k people if you count the suburbs. So we're not quite up to the level where there is a significant car-free or car-light population, like there is in NYC. Still, there is a lot of centralized employment -- the state government, typical supporting industries like insurance companies, the universities, hospitals, etc. There is a bus system, but not a massive one. There are a couple of big trunk roads that get quite heavy traffic during commuter times. Nobody in their right mind rides on those streets. I have a general rule of thumb that I don't ride on multi-lane roads.
However, because there are still residential neighborhoods extending almost all the way into the downtown area, a major portion of our "bike infrastructure" is simply the residential streets, which have barely any traffic. The need for bike paths and lanes is simply to deal with the areas where there are no such streets, including some traffic bottlenecks due to the number of lakes that the city is built around.
There is a parking shortage downtown, which encourages people to take the bus. But it's not enough. A lot of employers subsidize the parking. Interestingly, the university does not, and so most of the uni employees have found alternative ways to commute.
It seems that the city is being pretty smart about adding bike lanes. They wait until a street or intersection has to be rebuilt anyway. A lot of rebuilding is going on because the underground infrastructure is reaching end of life. For instance my street needed new sewer and gas lines, but when they rebuilt it, they turned it into a marked bike boulevard. We don't follow the apparently widespread practice of painting a stripe in some arbitrary location and declaring it to be a bike lane.
However, because there are still residential neighborhoods extending almost all the way into the downtown area, a major portion of our "bike infrastructure" is simply the residential streets, which have barely any traffic. The need for bike paths and lanes is simply to deal with the areas where there are no such streets, including some traffic bottlenecks due to the number of lakes that the city is built around.
There is a parking shortage downtown, which encourages people to take the bus. But it's not enough. A lot of employers subsidize the parking. Interestingly, the university does not, and so most of the uni employees have found alternative ways to commute.
It seems that the city is being pretty smart about adding bike lanes. They wait until a street or intersection has to be rebuilt anyway. A lot of rebuilding is going on because the underground infrastructure is reaching end of life. For instance my street needed new sewer and gas lines, but when they rebuilt it, they turned it into a marked bike boulevard. We don't follow the apparently widespread practice of painting a stripe in some arbitrary location and declaring it to be a bike lane.
I was driving around in Madison in January 2020, and it was a bit icy. Even so, my impression was that there was a much larger proportion of the population bike commuting that time of year than I see in the summer in NH.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,822
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 623 Times
in
399 Posts
Something that often gets overlooked, is the amount of time it takes to develop a cycling culture. None of this happened overnight. Even in my time in Madison, the behavior of drivers and cyclists towards one another has improved, but that takes years. Also, finding the preferred routes that are convenient and avoid traffic is a gradually evolving process. Madison started out with a couple of assets. First, it's a college town, and making a large university car-friendly is simply insurmountable. The college and some other central employers have made it desirable to live in the middle of town. The people here have always been outdoorsy -- heck, we have ice fishing. And there's always been a moderate "hipster" movement that looks with envy at some of the more livable cities in the country and the world.
Likes For Gresp15C:
#19
Senior Member
A painted surface is generally a dangerous and slippery surface. Paved and lined is better, paved with colored tarmac is even better.
#20
Knurled Nut
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 14,899
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7848 Post(s)
Liked 8,412 Times
in
4,700 Posts
Likes For livedarklions: