Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Hypothetical situation, legal result of bike trail crosses centerline causing head on

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Hypothetical situation, legal result of bike trail crosses centerline causing head on

Old 08-17-21, 10:35 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 516
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 21 Posts
Hypothetical situation, legal result of bike trail crosses centerline causing head on

When I ride on bike trails, I sometimes ride right on the far edge to keep as much distance as possible from cyclists who weave, don't seem in complete control, or appear distracted, I wonder about the legal consequences of bikes colliding with such clear indication of fault. The possibility of injury is significant since closing speed of 30 MPH plus is common. I'll assume there is variability base on state law.
Lakerat is offline  
Old 08-17-21, 10:51 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,124
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17757 Post(s)
Liked 14,106 Times in 6,695 Posts
A suit for common law negligence would be the likely path.
indyfabz is offline  
Old 08-17-21, 12:06 PM
  #3  
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8185 Post(s)
Liked 9,087 Times in 5,052 Posts
Ride where you feel safest under the circumstances and don't worry about how the judge or jury will review it. I find that being too close to the edge of a paved path is often rather bumpy for my taste so I wouldn't likely do your riding strategy, but if it works for you, do it for that reason, not because of your hypothetical prospects at a hypothetical trial..

Tort cases rarely actually go to trial and this kind would probably less likely to than other kinds, not sure if there's any insurance company with deep pockets to make this worth going after.

If you actually get a trial concerning a head-on on a bike path, you and the other party will probably both claim it's the other who caused the accident. The odds that either one of you will be able to prove their version of the story are not great unless you have a GoPro and it just happens to be pointed exactly the right way. So more than likely, it's going t come down to which of you looks less like they are lying.
livedarklions is offline  
Likes For livedarklions:
Old 08-17-21, 04:10 PM
  #4  
Expired Member
 
shelbyfv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,334
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3583 Post(s)
Liked 5,177 Times in 2,629 Posts
I'd try to avoid a head on, even if you think you might prevail in court. The physical damage caused by a collision would be unpredictable. You might set up a crash where you could fault the other rider but end up a veggie. The potential payoff would not be worth the risk, IMO.
shelbyfv is offline  
Likes For shelbyfv:
Old 08-17-21, 04:57 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,495

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1477 Post(s)
Liked 634 Times in 434 Posts
What kind of a trail are you thinking of? Is it one specific trail or in general where pedestrians and using it as well?

30mph is really fast if it's a trail shared with pedestrians or a park recreational trail with dirt, tree branches and animals all over it.

If it's strictly a bicycle roadway where there's no chance of anything other than cyclists on it, then consider a head on collision with another cyclist travelling at 30mph means the both of you will collide at 60mph relative to each other. The mostly likely scenario would be if someone were passing a slow cyclist and is caught on the wrong side of the road.

Yesterday, I was involved in a bicycle collision. I was passing a jogger when another cyclist was trying to pass me at the same time. My regular pace was between ten and fifteen km/hr. Just as I was passing the jogger and headed back to the right side, I suddenly heard and felt the other cyclist's front wheel rub against my right calf and get caught against my peddle. She fell over but I kept in control and stopped. I told her not to pass someone who's in the process of passing someone.

It was all captured on my rear view camera. No damage, no injuries. We both apologized to each other and rode on.

Get a camera or two.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 08-17-21, 08:36 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Troul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 6,983

Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,772 Times in 1,792 Posts
^ 30mph combined... as 15mph is easily achieved by a rider.

If hard evidence is brought into the equation, then it'd be easily deciphered to who is at fault as long as there's no posted mph.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
Troul is offline  
Likes For Troul:
Old 08-18-21, 08:49 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2280 Post(s)
Liked 1,709 Times in 936 Posts
All I can say is that each case is different. Just try to ride as safely as you can and avoid accidents. And the suggestion to get a camera is a good one.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Likes For Milton Keynes:
Old 08-18-21, 08:53 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,602
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 915 Times in 516 Posts
I wouldn't bet on the average negligent bike path user's' ability to pay for any damages. Just keep yourself safe no matter where you are or who is coming toward you. Assume all others who are nearing your space are drunk or stupid or both, and act accordingly.
ClydeClydeson is offline  
Likes For ClydeClydeson:
Old 08-18-21, 09:27 AM
  #9  
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,160

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5842 Post(s)
Liked 4,466 Times in 3,078 Posts
We can toss hypothetical stuff around and all the logic we want. But until enough cases go to court and are decided on to make some precedents, then it's just a exercise in how well we can keep our composure and write legitimate thoughts on the subject.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 08-18-21, 09:33 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
work4bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,865
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3572 Post(s)
Liked 933 Times in 705 Posts
There have been several crashes on MUPs, I wonder what has come of those that made it to court? It would be difficult to prove in court in most cases without an onboard camera, unless you have surveillance video or enough credible witnesses. Unlike car accidents, which usually have a lot of forensic evidence involved.
work4bike is offline  
Old 08-18-21, 12:32 PM
  #11  
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8185 Post(s)
Liked 9,087 Times in 5,052 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
We can toss hypothetical stuff around and all the logic we want. But until enough cases go to court and are decided on to make some precedents, then it's just a exercise in how well we can keep our composure and write legitimate thoughts on the subject.
Originally Posted by work4bike
There have been several crashes on MUPs, I wonder what has come of those that made it to court? It would be difficult to prove in court in most cases without an onboard camera, unless you have surveillance video or enough credible witnesses. Unlike car accidents, which usually have a lot of forensic evidence involved.

The vast majority of car crashes do not get to trial mostly because trying the cases is expensive and the allocation of fault by the trier of fact (judge or jury) is really unpredictable. If you're expecting clarity to emerge from a series of court cases, I think you're going to have a very, very long wait. In the meantime, avoid head on collisions.
livedarklions is offline  
Likes For livedarklions:
Old 08-18-21, 12:35 PM
  #12  
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,160

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5842 Post(s)
Liked 4,466 Times in 3,078 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
The vast majority of car crashes do not get to trial mostly because trying the cases is expensive and the allocation of fault by the trier of fact (judge or jury) is really unpredictable. If you're expecting clarity to emerge from a series of court cases, I think you're going to have a very, very long wait. In the meantime, avoid head on collisions.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 08-18-21, 02:19 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
work4bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,865
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3572 Post(s)
Liked 933 Times in 705 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
....In the meantime, avoid head on collisions.
Roger That
work4bike is offline  
Old 08-18-21, 05:08 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,124
Mentioned: 209 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17757 Post(s)
Liked 14,106 Times in 6,695 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
We can toss hypothetical stuff around and all the logic we want. But until enough cases go to court and are decided on to make some precedents, then it's just a exercise in how well we can keep our composure and write legitimate thoughts on the subject.
Outcomes in such cases are not likely to be precedential because they are fact specific. Who was negligent in that particular incident. And thatís often decided by a jury.
indyfabz is offline  
Likes For indyfabz:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.