VC Puzzler 2
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mars (in VC Puzzler 1)
I liked that, let's do another one.
If you don't find participating in this thread to be interesting and/or useful, please find something else to do.
4 lane road, plus a bike lane along the right edge of the road. I was approaching an intersection with a red light, with several cars already stopped in front of me. The last 20 feet or so of the bike lane the stripe goes from solid to striped. The right lane is straight-or-right at this intersection. In the next block the road Y's, with the left lane splitting from the right. Since I needed to go right at the Y, I was already in the rightmost lane (adjacent to the bike lane). The left lane heads towards the university after the Y.
As I slowed my car to a stop behind the others cars waiting at the red light, I noticed a cyclist up ahead in the bike lane. It looked like he was stopped on or just to the left of the dashed bike lane stripe at the light. When the light turned green, everyone started moving, and I saw the cyclist proceed across the intersection and continue in the bike lane. Since he looked like a student (mountain bike, backpack) I assumed he would need to be merging across the right lane to get into the left lane to take the left branch to the university at the upcoming Y. The cars in front of me were passing him with no significant gaps between them. By the time I started moving at the green light, quite a few more cars had accumulated behind me. So as we were getting closer to the Y, the cyclist was running out of room/time to make his merge to the left branch. Anticipating his need, I slowed to create a gap for him.
Sure enough, as the car in front of me was passing him, I noticed him make a quick split-second glance to the side - just enough so that he could probably see in his peripheral vision that there was a gap forming in front of my car. A moment later he made another quick glance to the side (in a fraction of second he turned his head to the left, and then immediately back to straight ahead), stuck out his left arm to signal left, and rode straight across the right lane from the bike lane to the right side of the left traffic lane, just before the Y, and proceeded along the left branch.
QUESTIONS:
Is this a good example of cycling in traffic? A good example of vehicular cycling? Why or why not?
Did the cyclist negotiate for the ROW? Please explain.
Would you and/or a vehicular cyclist have done anything differently in this situation? If so, what?
Edit: (10/26 11:30 am, PST)
Click here for a google map of the area in question... the route from the light to the left branch of the Y (0.1 miles) is highlighted. It's probably about 400 feet, if that, from the light to the base of the "Y".
Last edited by Helmet Head; 10-26-05 at 12:36 PM.
#2
Senior Member
While the cyclist's move is the way most cyclists do this, I don't think it would fit with your description of "Vehicular Cycling". To do this maneuver the same way as the cyclist, you would have seen me actually signalling going straight from the light, if I wasn't sure the driver next to me wasn't going to turn right. This cyclist did not negotiate for the spot to merge into the traffic lane, he relied on a gap that someone else gave him. It sounds like he should have been looking and also signalling much sooner.
What we're missing here is how long your "block" is. In some places it's over 1/4 mile, but in my area it's usually referred to as a distance of about three houses. In a block that short, to cycle in a Vehicular Cycling manner, the cyclist would have actually occupied the right lane like a car. After leaving the light, this would have negated the need to merge across the right lane to get to the other side of the "Y". A left turn signal being displayed immediately after crossing the intersection might be a good way to let the cars behind know what's going on.
The thing that needs to be watched for when doing this is the last minute lane change by drivers that were in the wrong lane to continue to the right.
Edit: Watch out for last minute lane changes in an are like this no matter what method we use.
What we're missing here is how long your "block" is. In some places it's over 1/4 mile, but in my area it's usually referred to as a distance of about three houses. In a block that short, to cycle in a Vehicular Cycling manner, the cyclist would have actually occupied the right lane like a car. After leaving the light, this would have negated the need to merge across the right lane to get to the other side of the "Y". A left turn signal being displayed immediately after crossing the intersection might be a good way to let the cars behind know what's going on.
The thing that needs to be watched for when doing this is the last minute lane change by drivers that were in the wrong lane to continue to the right.
Edit: Watch out for last minute lane changes in an are like this no matter what method we use.
#3
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Is this a good example of cycling in traffic?
No.
A good example of vehicular cycling?
No.
Why or why not?
The cyclist should have negotiated for ROW, looked, signaled and moved left into the right lane and repeated the actions to get to the lane/location to get them to their destination.
Did the cyclist negotiate for the ROW? Please explain.
Yes, and no... he did for one lane, but then proceeded across it and assumed "protection" for the far left lane and turn.
Would you and/or a vehicular cyclist have done anything differently in this situation? If so, what?
The cyclist should have negotiated for ROW, looked, signaled and moved left into the right lane and repeated the actions to get to the lane/location to get them to their destination. We would expect the same actions from motorists moving across several lanes too... although actually getting a signal from a motorist is pretty much a non happening.
I too have seen students doing much the same thing... left turns from the BL... it just looks dangerous. I don't want a BL debate here, but damn, where in the world did they learn that move... Sigh
No.
A good example of vehicular cycling?
No.
Why or why not?
The cyclist should have negotiated for ROW, looked, signaled and moved left into the right lane and repeated the actions to get to the lane/location to get them to their destination.
Did the cyclist negotiate for the ROW? Please explain.
Yes, and no... he did for one lane, but then proceeded across it and assumed "protection" for the far left lane and turn.
Would you and/or a vehicular cyclist have done anything differently in this situation? If so, what?
The cyclist should have negotiated for ROW, looked, signaled and moved left into the right lane and repeated the actions to get to the lane/location to get them to their destination. We would expect the same actions from motorists moving across several lanes too... although actually getting a signal from a motorist is pretty much a non happening.
I too have seen students doing much the same thing... left turns from the BL... it just looks dangerous. I don't want a BL debate here, but damn, where in the world did they learn that move... Sigh
#4
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Dchiefransom
While the cyclist's move is the way most cyclists do this
"most cyclists... ??? "
Not hardly... the couple of times I have seen this type of move pulled, I thought it was some version of the Jersey sweep... it is a totally foolish move.
Sure it can be pulled off... and I can run across traffic lanes on a freeway too!
#5
semifreddo amartuerer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599
Bikes: several
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It sounds like the distance from the intersection to the "Y" was too short for what the cyclist did. A better approach would have been to get into the left lane prior to the intersection in advance of the "Y" and move with the flow of traffic after the light changed, rather than dart out across afterwards. Last minute lane changes by cyclists or cars is a bad idea.
There are a couple of intersections very similar to this near me (more lanes, though). I find that I fare better if I get into the left lane well back of the "Y" if I intend to to take the left branch. Going through the Y, I take a good portion of the lane so my intentions are made clear . . . I would say, right tire track or so. This way people are not as tempted to pass me or be confused about which branch I'm taking. Once I get through the intersection I move further to the right, to the bike lane (gasp!) or edge of the road.
I don't know if my approach is a good example of cycling in traffic or VC or what; don't care really. I do know that not doing it has resulted in more close calls, horn honks, and shaking fists than doing as described in the example in the OP.
There are a couple of intersections very similar to this near me (more lanes, though). I find that I fare better if I get into the left lane well back of the "Y" if I intend to to take the left branch. Going through the Y, I take a good portion of the lane so my intentions are made clear . . . I would say, right tire track or so. This way people are not as tempted to pass me or be confused about which branch I'm taking. Once I get through the intersection I move further to the right, to the bike lane (gasp!) or edge of the road.
I don't know if my approach is a good example of cycling in traffic or VC or what; don't care really. I do know that not doing it has resulted in more close calls, horn honks, and shaking fists than doing as described in the example in the OP.
#7
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
"most cyclists... ??? "
Not hardly... the couple of times I have seen this type of move pulled, I thought it was some version of the Jersey sweep... it is a totally foolish move.
Not hardly... the couple of times I have seen this type of move pulled, I thought it was some version of the Jersey sweep... it is a totally foolish move.
#8
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Uh, yeah, most cyclists. Stand at the corner of Regents and Executive for 15 minutes any weekday morning, and see if any cyclists do anything other than this...
Actually this Y intersection has a BL on the far right, then just to the left of the right lane that breaks off, is another BL that forms and continues straight for about a 1/4 block. The BL then continues along on the remainder of that breakoff on Regents road. This is all in a 1 block area. Typically to move from one BL to the other, one only crosses the right lane alone... and ROW negotiation only has to be made to cross that one lane. Most traffic flows along the left branch of the Y. The right lane is the "exit" so to speak... normal flow is towards the left branch of the Y.
I have however seen students cross the entire area in one swoop to get to the left lane turn up another 1/2 block.
I go this way on my commute... I move into the right lane and hold off MV traffic as I move into the BL that is just to the left of the low traffic right lane. I then do a merge from the BL into the right lane and enter the left turn lane to make the turn onto campus.
Why do I go this way? To avoid the heavier traffic at Campus point and Genesee with a right only lane that goes down Campus point.
This area also has the distinction of several shops tucked into a small strip mall... where in the early mornings motorists rush like lemmings for their bagals. To prevent right hooks by these not too awake motorists, I use the whole lane rather then ride in the BL. I sure that probably irratates some motorists, but tough.
Last edited by genec; 10-26-05 at 01:00 PM.
#9
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I added a line to #7. Not to turn this into yet another BL bashing thread, but I've just realized another way to express how bike lanes affect cyclists.
I think bike lanes tend to facilitate treatment of vehicular lanes by cyclists with a "pedestrian" approach: as space to cross rather than as space in which to travel in the normal vehicular direction. Bike lanes also tend to create in motorists the expectation of cyclists to treat the vehicular lanes in this "pedestrian" manner.
I think bike lanes tend to facilitate treatment of vehicular lanes by cyclists with a "pedestrian" approach: as space to cross rather than as space in which to travel in the normal vehicular direction. Bike lanes also tend to create in motorists the expectation of cyclists to treat the vehicular lanes in this "pedestrian" manner.
#10
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
This stuff about negotiating a merge...
I try (left arm out firmly, head turned behind me, etc.) all the time, mostly 1/4mi or so before a left turn. But quite often I get no response, just a stream of passing cars. I keep moving so I get closer to intersection and sometimes before I give up and prepare to make a right and a u-turn, a gap opens up (not because I negotiated it) and I take it, cutting hard across 3-lanes. Not really VC, but better than waiting at light of x-street that never turns green.
Oh, as to original scenario. What other said. Really for that short a distance I'd get prepared for turn at stop light before and ride on left side of lane before making left.
Al
I try (left arm out firmly, head turned behind me, etc.) all the time, mostly 1/4mi or so before a left turn. But quite often I get no response, just a stream of passing cars. I keep moving so I get closer to intersection and sometimes before I give up and prepare to make a right and a u-turn, a gap opens up (not because I negotiated it) and I take it, cutting hard across 3-lanes. Not really VC, but better than waiting at light of x-street that never turns green.
Oh, as to original scenario. What other said. Really for that short a distance I'd get prepared for turn at stop light before and ride on left side of lane before making left.
Al
#11
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
I try (left arm out firmly, head turned behind me, etc.) all the time, mostly 1/4mi or so before a left turn. But quite often I get no response, just a stream of passing cars.
#12
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
What a bunch of bastards. Are you making eye contact with any of them? Are you very expressive with your face? Can your face say, "please let me in?" Are you smiling?
The other problem I encounter is that when someone does slow, drivers in the adjacent lane will see the gap and merge into it just when I want to.
Al
#13
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
Its hard to make real eye contact when they are passing at 45-50mph, since in order to negotate you need to get them to slow well before they are close enough to see faces.
The other problem I encounter is that when someone does slow, drivers in the adjacent lane will see the gap and merge into it just when I want to.
The other problem I encounter is that when someone does slow, drivers in the adjacent lane will see the gap and merge into it just when I want to.
Do you think it's possible that your belief that even if someone slows down for you to create a gap, that gap will be filled by someone else, affects the enthusiasm/conviction with which you are asking for someone to create the gap for you?
At 50 mph, they're moving at 73 feet/second; at 15 mph you're moving at 22 fps.
So to look 1 second back, you have to look back 50 feet.
Five seconds back is 250 feet.
So drivers 4-5 seconds back, which is plenty of time to slow down, should be able to see you signalling 200-250 feet up ahead. Those are the drivers whose attention you're trying to get, not the one immediately behind you. That's who you should be looking at, trying to negotiate with. You might have to stand up and signal with your hand pointed slightly upwards, and index finger sticking out, to get their attention that far back. But the main thing is to be looking at them, so they know you are looking for help from them specifically. Maybe even alternate between pointing at them, back at your chest, and the direction in which you would like to go. Communicate your desire/intent. Get creative. Whatever works...
The other thing is to start inching your way left, and do not yield an inch once you've established your ROW in it. This should cause the flow of motorists to start inching left as they pass you, and naturally slow down, thus reducing the speed differential between you and them, making negotiation that much easier.
Last edited by Helmet Head; 10-26-05 at 01:23 PM.
#14
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Man, if I ever get out to Phoenix I would love to go for a ride with you here. The eye contact is more about them seeing your face looking at them (or their windshield behind which you can't actually see them) then you actually seeing their face and eyes.
Do you think it's possible that your belief that even if someone slows down for you to create a gap, that gap will be filled by someone else, affects the enthusiasm/conviction with which you are asking for someone to create the gap for you?
At 50 mph, they're moving at 73 feet/second; at 15 mph you're moving at 22 fps.
So to look 1 second back, you have to look back 50 feet.
Five seconds back is 250 feet.
So drivers 4-5 seconds back, which is plenty of time to slow down, should be able to see you signalling 200-250 feet up ahead. Those are the drivers whose attention you're trying to get, not the one immediately behind you. That's who you should be looking at, trying to negotiate with. You might have to stand up and signal with your hand pointed slightly upwards, and index finger sticking, to get their attention that far back. But the main thing is to be looking at them, so they know you are looking for help from them specifically.
The other thing is to start inching your way left, and do not yield an inch once you've established your ROW in it. This should cause the flow of motorists to start inching left as they pass you, and naturally slow down, thus reducing the speed differential between you and them, making negotiation that much easier.
Do you think it's possible that your belief that even if someone slows down for you to create a gap, that gap will be filled by someone else, affects the enthusiasm/conviction with which you are asking for someone to create the gap for you?
At 50 mph, they're moving at 73 feet/second; at 15 mph you're moving at 22 fps.
So to look 1 second back, you have to look back 50 feet.
Five seconds back is 250 feet.
So drivers 4-5 seconds back, which is plenty of time to slow down, should be able to see you signalling 200-250 feet up ahead. Those are the drivers whose attention you're trying to get, not the one immediately behind you. That's who you should be looking at, trying to negotiate with. You might have to stand up and signal with your hand pointed slightly upwards, and index finger sticking, to get their attention that far back. But the main thing is to be looking at them, so they know you are looking for help from them specifically.
The other thing is to start inching your way left, and do not yield an inch once you've established your ROW in it. This should cause the flow of motorists to start inching left as they pass you, and naturally slow down, thus reducing the speed differential between you and them, making negotiation that much easier.
No my fear of other drivers taking the gap doesn't impede my enthusiam. Its my experience with it that has freaked me out at time, a car slows, I start to merge, making a check of conditions ahead, look back and whoa, there is a car merging right into me. Not fun.
I also have been stuck in the middle of three lanes with cars whizzing by still trying ot merge left (yes left biased in lane) and find this terribly discomforting, end up going thru intersection since I never got the final negotiation and merging back right
Al
#15
Dubito ergo sum.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,735
Bikes: Bessie.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm not going to touch the VC or bike lane bugaboos, but I wanted to add an observation on the type of scenario Helmet Head posting here because its something I see often, and a situation I have found myself in.
Sooner or later all cyclists will find themselves in that "oops, I'm about to miss my turn" spot. For some its due to lack of planning or experience with lane changing, to others it may be distraction, rush-hour traffic making lane changes difficult, or other problems. Unfortunately too many people react with a "gotta make that turn" move and cut across multiple lanes, etc. I've found myself doing that a few times, and cussed myself out for it later.
Missing your turn is no big deal, and it beats becoming road kill. You can catch the next turn and double-back, or you can (gasp!) get off the bike at an intersection and use the cross-walks. Its not the end of the world, and it is safer than a mad dash across multiple lanes.
Sooner or later all cyclists will find themselves in that "oops, I'm about to miss my turn" spot. For some its due to lack of planning or experience with lane changing, to others it may be distraction, rush-hour traffic making lane changes difficult, or other problems. Unfortunately too many people react with a "gotta make that turn" move and cut across multiple lanes, etc. I've found myself doing that a few times, and cussed myself out for it later.
Missing your turn is no big deal, and it beats becoming road kill. You can catch the next turn and double-back, or you can (gasp!) get off the bike at an intersection and use the cross-walks. Its not the end of the world, and it is safer than a mad dash across multiple lanes.
#16
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by patc
...is safer than a mad dash across multiple lanes.
In recent mornings the sun is so low and directly behind me so I can't even see if cars are coming or not, so I do the safe turn described above.
Al
#17
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by patc
Its not the end of the world, and it is safer than a mad dash across multiple lanes.
Al
#18
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by patc
I'm not going to touch the VC or bike lane bugaboos, but I wanted to add an observation on the type of scenario Helmet Head posting here because its something I see often, and a situation I have found myself in.
Sooner or later all cyclists will find themselves in that "oops, I'm about to miss my turn" spot. For some its due to lack of planning or experience with lane changing, to others it may be distraction, rush-hour traffic making lane changes difficult, or other problems. Unfortunately too many people react with a "gotta make that turn" move and cut across multiple lanes, etc. I've found myself doing that a few times, and cussed myself out for it later.
Missing your turn is no big deal, and it beats becoming road kill. You can catch the next turn and double-back, or you can (gasp!) get off the bike at an intersection and use the cross-walks. Its not the end of the world, and it is safer than a mad dash across multiple lanes.
Sooner or later all cyclists will find themselves in that "oops, I'm about to miss my turn" spot. For some its due to lack of planning or experience with lane changing, to others it may be distraction, rush-hour traffic making lane changes difficult, or other problems. Unfortunately too many people react with a "gotta make that turn" move and cut across multiple lanes, etc. I've found myself doing that a few times, and cussed myself out for it later.
Missing your turn is no big deal, and it beats becoming road kill. You can catch the next turn and double-back, or you can (gasp!) get off the bike at an intersection and use the cross-walks. Its not the end of the world, and it is safer than a mad dash across multiple lanes.
#19
Senior Member
If we could watch an intersection like this in the area I work, this scenario wouldn't be played out like this very much. The majority of people on bicycles would be riding up the left side of the road anyway. I'm not sure how the ones coming toward us would do it, we'd have to see how the sidewalks are laid out.
#20
Dubito ergo sum.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,735
Bikes: Bessie.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
We need to teach motorist this too. Especially freeway drivers who exit at the last minute from the far left lane! Al
#21
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Depending on how far it is to from the light to the Y, and depending on traffic conditions I would probably take the left lane before I got to the light. Heavier traffic, I would start moving over earlier.
#22
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Boy, all this logic is making my head hurt like i was on a date with a mensa member!
The cyclist should have been left, signaled left earlier. Left of the lane at the stop, then straight thru instead of veering left makes me think he was an idiot- or maybe, he decided at the last minute to go get some doughnuts.
What I found very interesting in this liddle riddle from HH was his perspective on the 'bad biking' or whatever HH's point is. MR VC tain't as VC as I thought he was!!!!
The cyclist should have been left, signaled left earlier. Left of the lane at the stop, then straight thru instead of veering left makes me think he was an idiot- or maybe, he decided at the last minute to go get some doughnuts.
What I found very interesting in this liddle riddle from HH was his perspective on the 'bad biking' or whatever HH's point is. MR VC tain't as VC as I thought he was!!!!
#23
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
What I found very interesting in this liddle riddle from HH was his perspective on the 'bad biking' or whatever HH's point is. MR VC tain't as VC as I thought he was!!!!
#24
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
your perspective was from behind a windshield, dude.
My image of you as a VC cycling, self styled demigod, are forever shattered.
If you and Genec were riding in the car together, maybe you could have slowed down to go 1 on 1 with him and heckle the cyclist about his non VC riding.
My image of you as a VC cycling, self styled demigod, are forever shattered.
If you and Genec were riding in the car together, maybe you could have slowed down to go 1 on 1 with him and heckle the cyclist about his non VC riding.
#25
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
your perspective was from behind a windshield, dude.
This section is on my commute (I use the same route whether I drive or cycle), and also on my Saturday club ride, and so I have cycled it at least 800 times in the last five years. What this cyclist did I've seen done hundreds of times. That's how I knew to create the gap for him.