Bicycling and Global Warming, a Lost Cause?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 1,914
Bikes: Rans Stratus, Trek 1420, Rivendell Rambouillet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Bicycling and Global Warming, a Lost Cause?
The title of the article from the New York Times is "It's time to adapt to damage, global warming forum agrees." In it, writer Andrew Revkin discusses the international climate talks in New Delhi. At one point, he discusses ozone depleting chemicals, then states,
The entire article can be read at: The New York Times Website
As a bicyclist, I feel that putting the bicycle into the same reference as water buckets and then contrasting that with cars and washing machines does a huge disservice to bicycles as a legitimate mode of transportation, and also as the technological marvals of engineering efficiency that they represent. What are your thoughts?
John
But no ready substitutes exist for cheap, plentiful fossil fuels. Many experts say the use of coal and oil is bound to keep rising for decades, particularly as poor countries climb the economic ladder from bicycles and water buckets to cars and washing machines.
As a bicyclist, I feel that putting the bicycle into the same reference as water buckets and then contrasting that with cars and washing machines does a huge disservice to bicycles as a legitimate mode of transportation, and also as the technological marvals of engineering efficiency that they represent. What are your thoughts?
John
#2
Every lane is a bike lane
Originally posted by John C. Ratliff
As a bicyclist, I feel that putting the bicycle into the same reference as water buckets and then contrasting that with cars and washing machines does a huge disservice to bicycles as a legitimate mode of transportation, and also as the technological marvals of engineering efficiency that they represent. What are your thoughts?
As a bicyclist, I feel that putting the bicycle into the same reference as water buckets and then contrasting that with cars and washing machines does a huge disservice to bicycles as a legitimate mode of transportation, and also as the technological marvals of engineering efficiency that they represent. What are your thoughts?
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
#3
Punk Rock Lives
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Throughout the west in a van, on my bike, and in the forest
Posts: 3,305
Bikes: Long Haul Trucker with BRIFTERS!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times
in
39 Posts
You guys are making too much of the words. By 'cars' i think they mean motorized transport for all their goods and services; most fo which are not widely motorized and thus immensely wasteful en route as foods rot and goods are damaged.
The same arguments people make about 'using bikes versus cars' can be made for 'using buckets vs. washing machines', and VICE VERSA. The latter save vast amounts of toil and effort. And I might add, washing machines and dryers have been made much more efficient than they were back in the 1950s or 60s...they use less water and electriity; although of course much more than if you did the stuff by hand and on a line.
roughstuff
The same arguments people make about 'using bikes versus cars' can be made for 'using buckets vs. washing machines', and VICE VERSA. The latter save vast amounts of toil and effort. And I might add, washing machines and dryers have been made much more efficient than they were back in the 1950s or 60s...they use less water and electriity; although of course much more than if you did the stuff by hand and on a line.
roughstuff
#5
Banned.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 616
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If there really is such a thing as "global warming", and more importantly if human activity is the cause, the appropriate measures ought to be taken later, if at all. We'll know better what the effects are in the future, we'll be richer, and have more technology available to adapt. What we ought not to do is derail the economy of the first world now.
Lest some be tempted to start employing the usual metaphors about driving on a dark road with no lights and refusing to hit the brakes, notice that the cost of taking the action urged on us by environmentalists is huge, and certain. That "global warming" is a serious problem, and one we can do anything to reverse even if it is, is much less clear.
So, here's one vote for ignoring this "issue" for a while.
Some other articles for anyone interested in the radical, right-wing view:
https://www.cato.org/current/global-warming/
Lest some be tempted to start employing the usual metaphors about driving on a dark road with no lights and refusing to hit the brakes, notice that the cost of taking the action urged on us by environmentalists is huge, and certain. That "global warming" is a serious problem, and one we can do anything to reverse even if it is, is much less clear.
So, here's one vote for ignoring this "issue" for a while.
Some other articles for anyone interested in the radical, right-wing view:
https://www.cato.org/current/global-warming/
#6
Huachuca Rider
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,275
Bikes: Fuji CCR1, Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is I think a huge difference between riding a bicycle because one chooses to, and riding one becasue that is all that is available or affordable.
I shouldn't wish to wake in the middle of the night and discover that my wife, or my dog needed medical attention and attempt to deliver them to it on my bicycle. Nor would I expect to wait for emergency services people to show up on their bicycles to administer aid. In some places, a bicycle or walking is the only way these things can happen. Life expectancy in these jurisdictions are I opine, shorter.
This is an extreme example, yet where the standard of living supports it, can be applied to transporting multiple members of a family on an outing, shopping for more than can be carried on a bicycle or traveling distances made impractical by constraints of time or by virtue of the available strength and stamina of the person pedaling.
To argue for a reversion to more primitive means of transport for the whole society is futile. How am I going to use my bicycle to haul home an entire animal I've killed when all I needed was a pound of ground meat?
I shouldn't wish to wake in the middle of the night and discover that my wife, or my dog needed medical attention and attempt to deliver them to it on my bicycle. Nor would I expect to wait for emergency services people to show up on their bicycles to administer aid. In some places, a bicycle or walking is the only way these things can happen. Life expectancy in these jurisdictions are I opine, shorter.
This is an extreme example, yet where the standard of living supports it, can be applied to transporting multiple members of a family on an outing, shopping for more than can be carried on a bicycle or traveling distances made impractical by constraints of time or by virtue of the available strength and stamina of the person pedaling.
To argue for a reversion to more primitive means of transport for the whole society is futile. How am I going to use my bicycle to haul home an entire animal I've killed when all I needed was a pound of ground meat?
__________________
Just Peddlin' Around
Just Peddlin' Around
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 1,914
Bikes: Rans Stratus, Trek 1420, Rivendell Rambouillet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think you are mistaking what I stated above. My thought is that the developing world should concentrate on infrastructure, on providing electricity and clean drinking water to their population, rather than concentrating on getting everyone into autos. Trucks are needed for transportation, as are good roads. But not if they are completely clogged by cars.
I do think that a country trying to gain economically would do best to emphasize the things that will encourage productivity, self-reliance, the ability to take care of their people. I would much rather see the washing machines, public transportation systems, good sewage plants with the ability to handle all the population, and reliable drinking water than simply concentrating on getting personal cars for transportation.
John
I do think that a country trying to gain economically would do best to emphasize the things that will encourage productivity, self-reliance, the ability to take care of their people. I would much rather see the washing machines, public transportation systems, good sewage plants with the ability to handle all the population, and reliable drinking water than simply concentrating on getting personal cars for transportation.
John
#9
Every lane is a bike lane
Originally posted by John C. Ratliff
I think you are mistaking what I stated above. My thought is that the developing world should concentrate on infrastructure, on providing electricity and clean drinking water to their population, rather than concentrating on getting everyone into autos. Trucks are needed for transportation, as are good roads. But not if they are completely clogged by cars.
I think you are mistaking what I stated above. My thought is that the developing world should concentrate on infrastructure, on providing electricity and clean drinking water to their population, rather than concentrating on getting everyone into autos. Trucks are needed for transportation, as are good roads. But not if they are completely clogged by cars.
People always complain about how they can't afford to send the children to that exclusive private school, or how they can't afford to live in that lovely neighbourhood that's close to work, shops etc. Of course, the amount of money they are spending on paying off, running and maintaining their car could usually get them all of those things and more, but they simply refuse to see it. It's the old circular logic of "I need my car to do the things that have to be done to pay for my car."
Of course, it isn't totally rational, but then most people aren't when confronted with this sort of advertising.
__________________
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
I am clinically insane. I am proud of it.
That is all.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern California
Posts: 771
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by Chris L
Heck, you only need to look at the developed world to see examples of the advertising brainwashing that made the automobile so popular in the first place.
Heck, you only need to look at the developed world to see examples of the advertising brainwashing that made the automobile so popular in the first place.
#11
cycle-powered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Posts: 1,848
Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I walk the streets in some of the poorest neighborhoods in downtown L.A. everyday. A large portion of the communities don't have a pot to piss in but the majority of the people drive nice cars and blab away on cell phones. Priorities?
or visit a US trailer park where about half the residents are actually poor and the other half have a corvette and BMW or Dodge pickup or something similar parked next to the trailer -- often the car is worth more than the home!!
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: N.E.England.(geordieland)
Posts: 605
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do the car corporations give a jot about Global warming "I think not".
They are only interested in profit, profit above everything.
It is quite alarming to see of the massive advertizing and car owning campagne being perpitrated by these company`s in China and the far East as they move into a more Westernized modern society.
Just imagin the massive explosion in co2 gases as the millions in this part of world give up their bikes for motorized transport over the coming decades.
We aint seen anything yet to what might happen in the future as regards global warming.
They are only interested in profit, profit above everything.
It is quite alarming to see of the massive advertizing and car owning campagne being perpitrated by these company`s in China and the far East as they move into a more Westernized modern society.
Just imagin the massive explosion in co2 gases as the millions in this part of world give up their bikes for motorized transport over the coming decades.
We aint seen anything yet to what might happen in the future as regards global warming.
#13
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1390 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times
in
835 Posts
The best solution is an educated, disciplined populace comprising individuals who act out of LONG-TERM, ENLIGHTENED self-interest. Whenever it is practical, safe, and reasonably efficient to do so, I walk, cycle, or ride public transit, for my own physical, emotional, and financial health, as well as for the environment. I drive my compact-midsize low-emission 4-cylinder cars (e.g., a VW Passat station wagon) about 4000mi/6500km per year and make them last for many years. Although I own and use a gas-fired clothes dryer, I save energy by hanging towels, jeans, and other large, bulky items on a clothesline. My mostly-vegetarian diet is nutritious and thorougly enjoyable.
Bottom line: There is a balanced, tenable middle ground in the debate on global warming and in lifestyle choice. By reducing waste of energy and/or materials, we can continue to enjoy the fruits of our modern lifestyle, while significantly curbing its adverse impacts.
Bottom line: There is a balanced, tenable middle ground in the debate on global warming and in lifestyle choice. By reducing waste of energy and/or materials, we can continue to enjoy the fruits of our modern lifestyle, while significantly curbing its adverse impacts.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Snowy midwest
Posts: 5,391
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally posted by Greg
It's proven fact that bicycles have caused 52.7% of all global warming.
It's proven fact that bicycles have caused 52.7% of all global warming.
Hmm. Well, anyway, I can say that I feel hotter when I bicycle than when I ride in a car, so there may be something to Greg's info.
#15
It's in my blood
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 1,222
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Even if all cars are made pollution-free, I will ride a bike.
I like the way it makes me fit. Cars contribute to physical deterioration and health problems (should this warning be put on the side of all cars sold and on all car ads?)
I like the way it makes me fit. Cars contribute to physical deterioration and health problems (should this warning be put on the side of all cars sold and on all car ads?)
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northern Neck Tidewater Va.
Posts: 1,688
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by Merriwether
If there really is such a thing as "global warming", and more importantly if human activity is the cause, the appropriate measures ought to be taken later, if at all. We'll know better what the effects are in the future, we'll be richer, and have more technology available to adapt. What we ought not to do is derail the economy of the first world now.
Lest some be tempted to start employing the usual metaphors about driving on a dark road with no lights and refusing to hit the brakes, notice that the cost of taking the action urged on us by environmentalists is huge, and certain. That "global warming" is a serious problem, and one we can do anything to reverse even if it is, is much less clear.
So, here's one vote for ignoring this "issue" for a while.
Some other articles for anyone interested in the radical, right-wing view:
https://www.cato.org/current/global-warming/
If there really is such a thing as "global warming", and more importantly if human activity is the cause, the appropriate measures ought to be taken later, if at all. We'll know better what the effects are in the future, we'll be richer, and have more technology available to adapt. What we ought not to do is derail the economy of the first world now.
Lest some be tempted to start employing the usual metaphors about driving on a dark road with no lights and refusing to hit the brakes, notice that the cost of taking the action urged on us by environmentalists is huge, and certain. That "global warming" is a serious problem, and one we can do anything to reverse even if it is, is much less clear.
So, here's one vote for ignoring this "issue" for a while.
Some other articles for anyone interested in the radical, right-wing view:
https://www.cato.org/current/global-warming/
Joe
#17
cycle-powered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Posts: 1,848
Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
hey Joe, i like the comment...
basically the only reasons NOT to reduce pollution:
* it's cheaper - i.e. more profitable
* it's easier - i.e. no restrctions, regulations, sacrafices
for the benefits of reducing pollution and keeping our environment clean, safe and beautiful i cannot see why some pollution-reduction is not warranted...
now, deciding on the tradeoff between cost and benefits is difficult. this is one reason why i am a proponent for the "pollution trading" ideas where companies can buy and sell the rights to pollute. although from a pure environmentalist standpoint this sounds horrible - "buying and selling the right to pollute" - i think it a good way to integrate the environment into the economic system which i think bcause of the dominance of profti-driven capitalism is a requirement to really improve the environment; only when it affects the corporate bottom line on the positive side will the environment really be protected.
joining Kyto, even if you don't believe in global warming, would establish a global pollution trading market and really start the efforts to reduce pollution (because the companies that do so would earn TONS of money)
basically the only reasons NOT to reduce pollution:
* it's cheaper - i.e. more profitable
* it's easier - i.e. no restrctions, regulations, sacrafices
for the benefits of reducing pollution and keeping our environment clean, safe and beautiful i cannot see why some pollution-reduction is not warranted...
now, deciding on the tradeoff between cost and benefits is difficult. this is one reason why i am a proponent for the "pollution trading" ideas where companies can buy and sell the rights to pollute. although from a pure environmentalist standpoint this sounds horrible - "buying and selling the right to pollute" - i think it a good way to integrate the environment into the economic system which i think bcause of the dominance of profti-driven capitalism is a requirement to really improve the environment; only when it affects the corporate bottom line on the positive side will the environment really be protected.
joining Kyto, even if you don't believe in global warming, would establish a global pollution trading market and really start the efforts to reduce pollution (because the companies that do so would earn TONS of money)
#18
Very Senior Member
Italy it is quite common now that young unmarried men in their 20s and 30s live at home with their moms so they can afford an expensive car
__________________
It's better to cycle through life than to drive by it.
It's better to cycle through life than to drive by it.