Facilities for encouraging novice/beginning cyclists
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Facilities for encouraging novice/beginning cyclists
I had a recent exchange of emails with traffic engineering here in the city (Ann Arbor, for all you locals) about the schedule for removing the green "sidewalk bike route" signs. The guy was quite friendly and helpful, and pointed out that they are going to remove them on a case-by-case basis, rather than taking them all down. The reason is that they want novices/beginners to have a chance to start cycling w/o feeling intimidated and such. He specifically noted that the current setup is far from ideal.
So I was thinking that if a problem exists here, a similar one probably exists almost everywhere else. Does anyone have suggestions as to what could be done to accomodate novices, hopefully w/o creating more problems than they solve? I can understand novice riders feeling queasy in traffic; I know I sure was.
So I was thinking that if a problem exists here, a similar one probably exists almost everywhere else. Does anyone have suggestions as to what could be done to accomodate novices, hopefully w/o creating more problems than they solve? I can understand novice riders feeling queasy in traffic; I know I sure was.
#2
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The problem is the expectation of novices/beginners to ride anywhere. The fact is, traffic is too crazy on a lot of streets for novices to handle, and a "facility" to encourage them to ride there anyway is the last thing they need.
It's not a problem the traffic engineering department should be concerned with solving, any more than they should be trying to make the busy streets safe for beginning drivers who have had no training.
Novices should start with quiet low traffic volume streets, build up their bicycle handling skills, and move up from there to traffic skills on gradually busier streets, one step at a time, just like anything else. The idea that you should be able to skip all that and still ride all the way across the city is a bad one.
It's not a problem the traffic engineering department should be concerned with solving, any more than they should be trying to make the busy streets safe for beginning drivers who have had no training.
Novices should start with quiet low traffic volume streets, build up their bicycle handling skills, and move up from there to traffic skills on gradually busier streets, one step at a time, just like anything else. The idea that you should be able to skip all that and still ride all the way across the city is a bad one.
#3
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why are they removing the green bike route signs? They can be valuable for people traveling through town to know the way to go. I often tell people to follow our signs when they're on a bike trip and coming through. They mark out various named routes such as the Coast route, the Cross-town route, the Foothill route and more. Makes it easy to give directions. Easier than trying to spell out every street name, many of which I don't know by name.
#4
Ride the Road
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,059
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check; hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by HelmetHead
Novices should start with quiet low traffic volume streets, build up their bicycle handling skills, and move up from there to traffic skills on gradually busier streets, one step at a time, just like anything else. The idea that you should be able to skip all that and still ride all the way across the city is a bad one.
Originally Posted by sbhikes
Why are they removing the green bike route signs? They can be valuable for people traveling through town to know the way to go. . . .
#5
52-week commuter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,929
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What I think is funny is that a lot of novices start out on multi-use-trails, which around here are an absolute mob scene on nice weekends. I ride every day in rush hour traffic, and I find a popular trail on a weekend to be far scarier, with the crowding and the lance wannabees passing recklessly. If people think that is easier than the road, no wonder so many people think cycling is so dangerous.
I think most people would be best served riding on the street in front of their house.
I think most people would be best served riding on the street in front of their house.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I agree, except for one point. I do think this is something the traffic engineering department should address. NOT by trying to make all streets suitable for beginners, but by making a reasonable progression.
Let me use how I started. I got interested because of a trip to Yosemite and also doing a ride in Baja. But locally the streets were intimidating. I started riding in the Sepulveda flood control basin. I would drive there and take the bike out of my car. After a while I decided a 6 mile drive was stupid and worked on finding a 'safe' (to my beginners eyes) route. It was difficult, bordering on impossible as the back roads did not go through (I mean did not go through, not crossed busy streets). Eventually I decided that the semi-major street to get there was just fine. Not long afer that I hooked up with a local club and now ride just about anywhere.
My suggestion is take the bike trails/paths and spread out. From them put in bike lanes (where they work) so that people can ride to the paths/recreational areas. Where the bike lanes end put in bike routes (nothing more than signs so cyclists don't need to find the easy streets). This gives a progression.
This is sort of like a child and water. They start in wading pool (Bike paths) move to the shallow end of the big pool (Bike lanes) make their way into the deep end (bike routes) go into the ocean on a nice day (reasonable traffic, back roads) and finally decide they can go on almsot any street (the ocean on a rough day). The limit on either at the end is how 'rough' you are willing to deal with.
This can happen on bikes without help, I did it, but active design can help.
Let me use how I started. I got interested because of a trip to Yosemite and also doing a ride in Baja. But locally the streets were intimidating. I started riding in the Sepulveda flood control basin. I would drive there and take the bike out of my car. After a while I decided a 6 mile drive was stupid and worked on finding a 'safe' (to my beginners eyes) route. It was difficult, bordering on impossible as the back roads did not go through (I mean did not go through, not crossed busy streets). Eventually I decided that the semi-major street to get there was just fine. Not long afer that I hooked up with a local club and now ride just about anywhere.
My suggestion is take the bike trails/paths and spread out. From them put in bike lanes (where they work) so that people can ride to the paths/recreational areas. Where the bike lanes end put in bike routes (nothing more than signs so cyclists don't need to find the easy streets). This gives a progression.
This is sort of like a child and water. They start in wading pool (Bike paths) move to the shallow end of the big pool (Bike lanes) make their way into the deep end (bike routes) go into the ocean on a nice day (reasonable traffic, back roads) and finally decide they can go on almsot any street (the ocean on a rough day). The limit on either at the end is how 'rough' you are willing to deal with.
This can happen on bikes without help, I did it, but active design can help.
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
The problem is the expectation of novices/beginners to ride anywhere. The fact is, traffic is too crazy on a lot of streets for novices to handle, and a "facility" to encourage them to ride there anyway is the last thing they need.
It's not a problem the traffic engineering department should be concerned with solving, any more than they should be trying to make the busy streets safe for beginning drivers who have had no training.
Novices should start with quiet low traffic volume streets, build up their bicycle handling skills, and move up from there to traffic skills on gradually busier streets, one step at a time, just like anything else. The idea that you should be able to skip all that and still ride all the way across the city is a bad one.
It's not a problem the traffic engineering department should be concerned with solving, any more than they should be trying to make the busy streets safe for beginning drivers who have had no training.
Novices should start with quiet low traffic volume streets, build up their bicycle handling skills, and move up from there to traffic skills on gradually busier streets, one step at a time, just like anything else. The idea that you should be able to skip all that and still ride all the way across the city is a bad one.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Apologies for a late follow-up to my own post, but I was thinking about whether it would be a good idea at the end of a bike lane to remove the "sidewalk bike route" signs and replace them with the yellow bike sign plus a "share the road" plaque. IMO the yellow sign there would make perfect sense, b/c the bike lane ending means that autos ought to be extra-vigilant in that area for bikes merging (Packard at East Stadium comes to mind for me for you locals). On the wider recommended cycling streets, perhaps the signs can be repeated at regular intervals, replacing the green ones which are currently placed at regular intervals. No signs can be posted on the narrow, unfriendly to novices, routes. What do you all think, and should I politely suggest this to city engineering?
#8
beginner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Somerset, NJ, USA
Posts: 758
Bikes: Trek 800, Gary Fisher Advance, Trek 2300 Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DCCommuter
What I think is funny is that a lot of novices start out on multi-use-trails, which around here are an absolute mob scene on nice weekends. I ride every day in rush hour traffic, and I find a popular trail on a weekend to be far scarier, with the crowding and the lance wannabees passing recklessly. If people think that is easier than the road, no wonder so many people think cycling is so dangerous.
I think most people would be best served riding on the street in front of their house.
I think most people would be best served riding on the street in front of their house.
I learned to ride a bike (and later a motorcycle) in an empty parking lot. This would seem an ideal place to start. Or on an empty trail. Or as you suggest, an empty street. (Recurring theme?)
Then, once the new cyclist has mastered basic bicycle handling, as HH suggests, progressively less quiet streets.
Last edited by budster; 01-11-06 at 12:04 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Ngchen
Apologies for a late follow-up to my own post, but I was thinking about whether it would be a good idea at the end of a bike lane to remove the "sidewalk bike route" signs and replace them with the yellow bike sign plus a "share the road" plaque. ...What do you all think, and should I politely suggest this to city engineering?
Consider sharing with the engineers the following quote from the book The Traffic Safety Toolbox published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1993, page 208):
"Sidewalk bike paths. From the late 1970s through the mid-1980s a number of communities signed some sidewalks or built new paths for bicyclists parallel to roadways. Several states even passed laws forcing bicyclists to use such facilities if they existed. Bicycle/car crashes increased dramatically in some corridors, especially at driveways, intersections, on bridges, and other locations. Sidewalks or paths parallel to a roadway force bicyclists to ride against traffic half of the time. In either direction, motorists are often surprised by the presence of cyclists [on sidepaths], since [motorists] are neither conditioned nor capable of searching these locations for traffic moving at 8-15 mph. Many pedestrians were also hurt, or complained that it was no longer comfortable to walk. Also, many motorists became less considerate of bicyclists who continued to use the often safer roadway sections....in no case should a bicyclist be forced to use the sidewalk pathway. Never sign a sidewalk or parallel path as a bikeway, since many motorists who see these signs will assume that those bicyclists riding on the roadway section are not permitted to be there."
-Steve Goodridge
#10
Sumanitu taka owaci
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
The problem is the expectation of novices/beginners to ride anywhere. The fact is, traffic is too crazy on a lot of streets for novices to handle, and a "facility" to encourage them to ride there anyway is the last thing they need.
It's not a problem the traffic engineering department should be concerned with solving, any more than they should be trying to make the busy streets safe for beginning drivers who have had no training.
Novices should start with quiet low traffic volume streets, build up their bicycle handling skills, and move up from there to traffic skills on gradually busier streets, one step at a time, just like anything else. The idea that you should be able to skip all that and still ride all the way across the city is a bad one.
It's not a problem the traffic engineering department should be concerned with solving, any more than they should be trying to make the busy streets safe for beginning drivers who have had no training.
Novices should start with quiet low traffic volume streets, build up their bicycle handling skills, and move up from there to traffic skills on gradually busier streets, one step at a time, just like anything else. The idea that you should be able to skip all that and still ride all the way across the city is a bad one.
All these "skills" would have to be unlearned to ride lawfully as a vehicle in traffic.
__________________
No worries
No worries
#11
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unless the streets where the "novice" cyclist intends to ride are inviting, the novice cyclist probably won't ride at all. Especially if the novice cyclist has as his/her goal to use the bicycle for trips that might otherwise be done by car.
Nobody ever says to themselves, "Hey, I think I'd like to start cycling. I'll practice on pointless streets that have no relationship to where I want to go first."
Nobody ever says to themselves, "Hey, I think I'd like to start cycling. I'll practice on pointless streets that have no relationship to where I want to go first."
#12
Sumanitu taka owaci
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,945
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by sbhikes
Unless the streets where the "novice" cyclist intends to ride are inviting, the novice cyclist probably won't ride at all.
__________________
No worries
No worries
#13
Senior Member
If the facilities make it easy for the novice to put together a route to work or shopping that bypasses more difficult roads, I think it is a benefit. Later, with experience, the cyclist can replace the path portions of the trip with faster or shorter ones on busy roads.
Unless the whole city is repaved with sidepaths, even a novice will have to spend some time on the road, in traffic, for anything more than a trivial trip. Once they get riding, the desire for a quicker, easier, or more convenient trip will motivate them to open up the envelope and try more challenging roads.
Paul
Unless the whole city is repaved with sidepaths, even a novice will have to spend some time on the road, in traffic, for anything more than a trivial trip. Once they get riding, the desire for a quicker, easier, or more convenient trip will motivate them to open up the envelope and try more challenging roads.
Paul
#14
Dubito ergo sum.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,735
Bikes: Bessie.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulH
If the facilities make it easy for the novice to put together a route to work or shopping that bypasses more difficult roads, I think it is a benefit. Later, with experience, the cyclist can replace the path portions of the trip with faster or shorter ones on busy roads.
Unless the whole city is repaved with sidepaths, even a novice will have to spend some time on the road, in traffic, for anything more than a trivial trip. Once they get riding, the desire for a quicker, easier, or more convenient trip will motivate them to open up the envelope and try more challenging roads.
Paul
Unless the whole city is repaved with sidepaths, even a novice will have to spend some time on the road, in traffic, for anything more than a trivial trip. Once they get riding, the desire for a quicker, easier, or more convenient trip will motivate them to open up the envelope and try more challenging roads.
Paul
#15
Sophomoric Member
Just down the highway from the OP, in Lansing MI, a local cycling club took the initiative to print detailed city maps with suggested bike routes. The routes are quieter streets that take you to within a few blocks of anywhere in the metro area. The maps are printed in a booklet similar to the city maps that taxi drivers use, and are free at LBSs, libraries, or on request from the club. I found them quite useful when I started riding. I don't often use the maps any more, since I nowfeel confident to ride on just about any street. However, I do still use a lot of the routes that they suggested, as they are easy and more scenic alternatives to the busy highways. Another advantage is that expenses were low, since no signs or bureaucratic expenses were incurred.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#16
Clyde is my middle name.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 33
Bikes: Steel late-90's Raleigh MTB, modified for utility
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Slightly further down the highway from the OP, Grand Rapids, MI has a map like Lansing's with suggested routes, stretches that need extra caution (such as around freeway offramps), and trails. I found it last night when I was procrastinating doing homework. Along with that map, the city's web site also has a pamphlet that encourages beginners to take up cycling and promotes the virtues of commuting, including car vs. bike comparisons.
#17
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,501
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2742 Post(s)
Liked 3,389 Times
in
2,052 Posts
My city has gotten much better about bike routes, maps, etc.
https://www.ci.mil.wi.us/display/router.asp?docid=14143
https://www.ci.mil.wi.us/display/router.asp?docid=14143
#18
Sophomoric Member
Originally Posted by csnyder
Slightly further down the highway from the OP, Grand Rapids, MI has a map like Lansing's with suggested routes, stretches that need extra caution (such as around freeway offramps), and trails. I found it last night when I was procrastinating doing homework. Along with that map, the city's web site also has a pamphlet that encourages beginners to take up cycling and promotes the virtues of commuting, including car vs. bike comparisons.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#19
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
Of course, Michigan leads the nation (or at least OHIO) in every area of concern. Who put out the map in GR? I mean, a club, city gov't or somebody else?
Buckeyes - 25
Wolfpups - 21
I'll glady conceed the maps.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#20
Clyde is my middle name.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 33
Bikes: Steel late-90's Raleigh MTB, modified for utility
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Roody
Of course, Michigan leads the nation (or at least OHIO) in every area of concern. Who put out the map in GR? I mean, a club, city gov't or somebody else?
https://www.ci.grand-rapids.mi.us/index.pl?page_id=2665
#21
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Odd, but I ride in a city with a lot of bike lanes, compared to many of you, and think the more facilities for alternate roadway use, the merrier.
I went riding today and found some shoulders that have been restriped from a 3 foot bike accomodation to a six foot accomodation, and signs reading 'right lane bikes only.' I'm also seeing more 'share the road' signs around as well, both on striped bikelane roadways and those without.
Love bicycling facilities, put them all over. They don't 'encourage' bicyclists to not ride for transportation because of some false onus of 'segregationist ***********', they act as enabelers for more biking for more people. I've been riding so long, i think when i started the term 'bike lane' didn't even exist. helmets certainetly weren't anything but leather hairnets for racers. I like the developments i see in cities with bike facilities.
Breaking away from the lanes should be part of bicyclist education, if kids actually receive bicycling instruction anymore. I would hope that before Ann Arbor removes any of the 'sidewalk routes' they create an alternative instead of just removing them. Rip out the sidewalk and the right of way easement, place a new, well designed bike lane and a new walking path. Doesn't U of M in Ann Arbor already have an entrenched system of 'sidewalk' bike paths?
I went riding today and found some shoulders that have been restriped from a 3 foot bike accomodation to a six foot accomodation, and signs reading 'right lane bikes only.' I'm also seeing more 'share the road' signs around as well, both on striped bikelane roadways and those without.
Love bicycling facilities, put them all over. They don't 'encourage' bicyclists to not ride for transportation because of some false onus of 'segregationist ***********', they act as enabelers for more biking for more people. I've been riding so long, i think when i started the term 'bike lane' didn't even exist. helmets certainetly weren't anything but leather hairnets for racers. I like the developments i see in cities with bike facilities.
Breaking away from the lanes should be part of bicyclist education, if kids actually receive bicycling instruction anymore. I would hope that before Ann Arbor removes any of the 'sidewalk routes' they create an alternative instead of just removing them. Rip out the sidewalk and the right of way easement, place a new, well designed bike lane and a new walking path. Doesn't U of M in Ann Arbor already have an entrenched system of 'sidewalk' bike paths?
Last edited by Bekologist; 01-12-06 at 09:58 PM.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree that added facilities encourage cycling. The only problem is that they tend to as a side effect promote the false notion that bikes belong there. and nowhere else (aka the street).
What do you mean by ripping out the sidewalks? They are a wonderful part of the city, and they make things far more pleasant for pedestrians. FWIW, the U of M doesn't have any of the infamous "sidewalk bike routes."In fact, recently, due to complaints from merchants downtown about sidewalk cyclists, they put up a bunch of small yellow "shared lane" signs facing the road, and painted bikes on the roads. Facing somewhat toward the sidewalks, they put up white regulatory "walk your bike" signs. Enforcement tends to be lax, if not non-existent though.
What do you mean by ripping out the sidewalks? They are a wonderful part of the city, and they make things far more pleasant for pedestrians. FWIW, the U of M doesn't have any of the infamous "sidewalk bike routes."In fact, recently, due to complaints from merchants downtown about sidewalk cyclists, they put up a bunch of small yellow "shared lane" signs facing the road, and painted bikes on the roads. Facing somewhat toward the sidewalks, they put up white regulatory "walk your bike" signs. Enforcement tends to be lax, if not non-existent though.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 760
Bikes: Road, Mtn, Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ngchen
What do you mean by ripping out the sidewalks?
__________________
Humantransport.org: Advocacy on behalf of humans traveling under their own power
Humantransport.org: Advocacy on behalf of humans traveling under their own power
#24
Dominatrikes
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920
Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
Odd, but I ride in a city with a lot of bike lanes, compared to many of you, and think the more facilities for alternate roadway use, the merrier.
Originally Posted by patc
That was the case for me. First it was parking lots, then residential streets, then pathways. After that I used my city's cycling map to locate bike routes...
I didn't have to wait until I was an adult. There was always space for bikes.
In the cul-de-sac it was the whole street.
To the shopping center there were bike lanes and pleasant residential streets.
To the beach there were bike lanes, bike paths and off-road trails.
To cross town there were bike lanes, bike paths and some pretty scary urban streets but I got used to them. (I still live in the same town and I still try to avoid those same urban streets.)
The mountains were different. And from what I see there is no end to the stupidity of people driving in the mountains.