Article in the Jan./Feb. issue of Bicycling Magazine about helmets.
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Any thing in the article about the preception you give to other drivers.
How about a person wearing a helmet,
6 back lights, reflective ankles, reflective tape on bicycle, refelcitve sidewalls, a bell, a couple front lights, Ansi 2 vest, and refelctive shoes.
How about a person wearing a helmet,
6 back lights, reflective ankles, reflective tape on bicycle, refelcitve sidewalls, a bell, a couple front lights, Ansi 2 vest, and refelctive shoes.
#27
Portland Fred
Originally Posted by closetbiker
A helmet may help in "typical" crash....
However, it's often not the typical ones that cause the most damage.....
#28
Senior Member
Originally Posted by banerjek
I haven't been in that many crashes, but "typical" crashes often don't wind up with your head banging against the ground or metal.
However, it's often not the typical ones that cause the most damage.....
However, it's often not the typical ones that cause the most damage.....
I also agree that when you really need real protection (beyond superficial protection) it's not typical and beyond the range of protection of a helmet
#29
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Explain something to me then. How is it with the crashes I've had where an impact to my head occured & the helmet was damaged, yet I walked away, & know that with out the helmet I'd had been killed or seriously injured a helmet is still not considered a good idea, by some, to wear? Because of the thought they are so called superficial protection, or are thought to not protect as well as they should or not at all.
All of the accidents were on the roadways & at 12 mph or greater, one was at 25 mph when I went down, though none of the impacts were directly from a motor vehicle one of them was the end result.
I am not the only one who has had this happen. There are others here who have had an accident, had an impact to their head, the helmet did it's job & protected the head but was damaged & the person walked away & would have been otherwise killed had they not had a helmet on.
I am not saying to anyone you should wear a helmet. But with all that has been said here about it, how can the belief continue that a helmet is just a waste of money & those of us who wear one are gulliable to think it will help protect us if there is an accident?
Yeah, yeah, yeah I know that good riding skills are what are needed to protect yourself from a crash in the first place. You're right & hooray for those of you who have never had a crash & it has been a very long time since you have. Would you like a cookie or something?
Keep in mind though you can not predict, foresee or prevent everything & sometimes anything that happens while riding a bike. Who was it that said when it's your time to die, it's your time, nothing you can do about it? Guess what? Something similar could be said about being involved in a bicycle accident. Sometimes there is no control over it. So while there are those that believe wearing a helmet gives people a false hope & belief that it ilil prevent any injury, I'd venture to say some of those that say that believe their safe riding skills will prevent any accident they could ever be involved in.
All of the accidents were on the roadways & at 12 mph or greater, one was at 25 mph when I went down, though none of the impacts were directly from a motor vehicle one of them was the end result.
I am not the only one who has had this happen. There are others here who have had an accident, had an impact to their head, the helmet did it's job & protected the head but was damaged & the person walked away & would have been otherwise killed had they not had a helmet on.
I am not saying to anyone you should wear a helmet. But with all that has been said here about it, how can the belief continue that a helmet is just a waste of money & those of us who wear one are gulliable to think it will help protect us if there is an accident?
Yeah, yeah, yeah I know that good riding skills are what are needed to protect yourself from a crash in the first place. You're right & hooray for those of you who have never had a crash & it has been a very long time since you have. Would you like a cookie or something?
Keep in mind though you can not predict, foresee or prevent everything & sometimes anything that happens while riding a bike. Who was it that said when it's your time to die, it's your time, nothing you can do about it? Guess what? Something similar could be said about being involved in a bicycle accident. Sometimes there is no control over it. So while there are those that believe wearing a helmet gives people a false hope & belief that it ilil prevent any injury, I'd venture to say some of those that say that believe their safe riding skills will prevent any accident they could ever be involved in.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 399
Bikes: Specialized (2) Trek 400, Raleigh 3spd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As to the above post (NC's)...depends on the type of damage to the helmet.
You have to remember that the helmet adds an inch or two to the size of the head and the helmet may come into contact with pavement that your head may not have without the helmet. (NO, not a made up or original idea, a helmet article I read a few months ago brought this up.)
Besides, what kind of helmet should you be wearing? Different situations call for different protection.
Smooth surfaced helmets may allow the head to slide and increase the possibility of facial lacerations.
Helmets with a aero-point at the rear, may snag and promote neck injury.
Plain styrofoam helmets actually offer better impact resistance, but promote neck injuries.
Hard shell helmets, with no vents, offer the best protection with the least amount of helmet failures. But, to get that better protection, you have to put up with the heat.
When riding off-road in thick brush, a full-face helmet is recommended to prevent limbs or twigs from gouging your face or eyes, as well as help prevent facial injuries in the event of a crash.
If you want to wear a helmet for that "accident" that you feel is inevitable and a helmet will protect you from, then you really need to decide what type of accident you want to protect yourself from.
BTW, all those comments are from a helmet information web page about helmets and the best protection. (And no, I don't have a link...it was a while ago also.)
You have to remember that the helmet adds an inch or two to the size of the head and the helmet may come into contact with pavement that your head may not have without the helmet. (NO, not a made up or original idea, a helmet article I read a few months ago brought this up.)
Besides, what kind of helmet should you be wearing? Different situations call for different protection.
Smooth surfaced helmets may allow the head to slide and increase the possibility of facial lacerations.
Helmets with a aero-point at the rear, may snag and promote neck injury.
Plain styrofoam helmets actually offer better impact resistance, but promote neck injuries.
Hard shell helmets, with no vents, offer the best protection with the least amount of helmet failures. But, to get that better protection, you have to put up with the heat.
When riding off-road in thick brush, a full-face helmet is recommended to prevent limbs or twigs from gouging your face or eyes, as well as help prevent facial injuries in the event of a crash.
If you want to wear a helmet for that "accident" that you feel is inevitable and a helmet will protect you from, then you really need to decide what type of accident you want to protect yourself from.
BTW, all those comments are from a helmet information web page about helmets and the best protection. (And no, I don't have a link...it was a while ago also.)
#31
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by N_C
Explain something to me then. How is it with the crashes I've had where an impact to my head occured & the helmet was damaged, yet I walked away, & know that with out the helmet I'd had been killed or seriously injured a helmet is still not considered a good idea, by some, to wear? Because of the thought they are so called superficial protection, or are thought to not protect as well as they should or not at all.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by N_C
Explain something to me then. How is it with the crashes I've had where an impact to my head occured & the helmet was damaged, yet I walked away, & know that with out the helmet I'd had been killed or seriously injured a helmet is still not considered a good idea, by some, to wear? Because of the thought they are so called superficial protection, or are thought to not protect as well as they should or not at all.
Having said, that a helmet is cheap insurance, against incidents it is effective for, so I use one.
#33
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by Wogsterca
How do you know? The only way to really tell if a helmet is effective, is to have a repeatable event, both with and without. This could be accomplished using crash test dummies that measure the actual forces, but neither the pro Mandatory Helmet Law crowd or the anti Helmet crowd, are willing to undertake this kind of study, because they are both afraid they could be found out to be wrong.
Having said, that a helmet is cheap insurance, against incidents it is effective for, so I use one.
Having said, that a helmet is cheap insurance, against incidents it is effective for, so I use one.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#34
Enjoy
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle metro
Posts: 6,165
Bikes: Trek 5200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
+1 A sensless argument. Obviously if you hit your head and there's some sort of protection, it's better than nothing. If your head swells while riding and you don't want to wear one...that's your deal.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto (again) Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,931
Bikes: Old Bike: 1975 Raleigh Delta, New Bike: 2004 Norco Bushpilot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by jakub.ner
Gospel.
More on Statistics, when ever I see a statistic, I ask a question, what study is the statistic from, is a copy of the study available and most important who paid for the study.
Often someone like say, the Society for the Promotion of Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Laws Everywhere, will want statistics to promote their cause, and will hire someone to do a study, they will tell the folks doing the study, what they want proved, and the folks doing the study, will prove that point. Of course the SPMBHLE will then make this publically available to bicycling magazines, who will write articles, keeping in mind all the ad revenue from helmet manufacturers they will receive.
#36
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Wogsterca
when ever I see a statistic, I ask a question, what study is the statistic from, is a copy of the study available and most important who paid for the study.
#37
You need a new bike
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by N_C
You must not like the word helmet or any mention of it in general. So you post a response such as this. Ever hear "if you don't have anything nice to say keep your ****ing mouth shut?!" Well, follow that advice!
But it is.
#38
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
When I die, I'll donate my noggin to BF so you can all conduct the experiment.
#39
Crankenstein
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Spokane
Posts: 4,037
Bikes: Novara Randonee (TankerBelle)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Bicycle helmets are tested by mounting a weight with sensors into the helmet. Then dropping said helmet from 6 feet and measuring the forces transmitted to the weight. That's it. They are designed to withstand the types of falls that someone just learning how to ride a bike will be most likely to have.
Along the way they HAVE added the outer shell, but only because they found that the original helmets with no shell significantly INCREASED your chances of serious neck injuries, and actually increased your chance of dying in any kind of accident at speed.
My problem with the helmet nannies is that they insist on making biking seem to be dangerous.
IT'S NOT DANGEROUS.
Your chances of dying on a bicycle are HUGELY smaller than your chances of dying in a car. And you know what's REALLY cool? The more you ride, the LESS likely you are to die early!!!! And that's whether or not you wear a helmet.
WHY are you less likely to die at a young age? Well, number one, because the more you ride, the less likely you are to do something stupid on a bike, and get yourself killed. Then there's the health benefits... with heart disease being the number one killer in our country, anything that improves your cardiovascular system to the extent that bicycling does is GOOD! Plus, it can help keep your weight down, help prevent diabetes, and I'm sure there are a lot of other health benefits.
If I die on a bicycle, it WON'T be because I wasn't wearing a helmet. It will be because some self absorbed idiot in a car or truck wasn't controlling their vehicle properly and runs me over.
Edit: And yes, this whole thread is a troll. It's not like this debate hasn't been held OVER and OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER.....
You're not going to get me to change my opinion by spouting the exact same bad statistics over and over. And I'm obviously not going to get you to change your mind. So why the hell not just let the subject drop? Millions of people ride their bikes without helmets. All the helmet nannies in the country aren't going to change that.
Along the way they HAVE added the outer shell, but only because they found that the original helmets with no shell significantly INCREASED your chances of serious neck injuries, and actually increased your chance of dying in any kind of accident at speed.
My problem with the helmet nannies is that they insist on making biking seem to be dangerous.
IT'S NOT DANGEROUS.
Your chances of dying on a bicycle are HUGELY smaller than your chances of dying in a car. And you know what's REALLY cool? The more you ride, the LESS likely you are to die early!!!! And that's whether or not you wear a helmet.
WHY are you less likely to die at a young age? Well, number one, because the more you ride, the less likely you are to do something stupid on a bike, and get yourself killed. Then there's the health benefits... with heart disease being the number one killer in our country, anything that improves your cardiovascular system to the extent that bicycling does is GOOD! Plus, it can help keep your weight down, help prevent diabetes, and I'm sure there are a lot of other health benefits.
If I die on a bicycle, it WON'T be because I wasn't wearing a helmet. It will be because some self absorbed idiot in a car or truck wasn't controlling their vehicle properly and runs me over.
Edit: And yes, this whole thread is a troll. It's not like this debate hasn't been held OVER and OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER.....
You're not going to get me to change my opinion by spouting the exact same bad statistics over and over. And I'm obviously not going to get you to change your mind. So why the hell not just let the subject drop? Millions of people ride their bikes without helmets. All the helmet nannies in the country aren't going to change that.
__________________
"There is no greater wonder than the way the face and character of a woman fit so perfectly in a man's mind, and stay there, and he could never tell you why. It just seems it was the thing he most wanted." Robert Louis Stevenson
"There is no greater wonder than the way the face and character of a woman fit so perfectly in a man's mind, and stay there, and he could never tell you why. It just seems it was the thing he most wanted." Robert Louis Stevenson
Last edited by bmclaughlin807; 12-12-06 at 02:47 PM.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 518
Bikes: 2 Xootr Swifts, Dahon Curve, Oxford Winter Beater.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bmclaughlin807
Bicycle helmets are tested by mounting a weight with sensors into the helmet. Then dropping said helmet from 3 feet and measuring the forces transmitted to the weight. That's it.....
Originally Posted by bmclaughlin807
They are designed to withstand the types of falls that someone just learning how to ride a bike will be most likely to have.
#41
Senior Member
Originally Posted by bmclaughlin807
Your chances of dying on a bicycle are HUGELY smaller than your chances of dying in a car. And you know what's REALLY cool? The more you ride, the LESS likely you are to die early!!!! And that's whether or not you wear a helmet...
If I die on a bicycle, it WON'T be because I wasn't wearing a helmet. It will be because some self absorbed idiot in a car or truck wasn't controlling their vehicle properly and runs me over.
If I die on a bicycle, it WON'T be because I wasn't wearing a helmet. It will be because some self absorbed idiot in a car or truck wasn't controlling their vehicle properly and runs me over.
When someone says to me that less people die while riding a bike because of those numbers, I always point out that the huge majority who die on bikes do so because they were riding on the wrong side of the road, going though stop signs, riding at night without lights or were drunk (or some other idiotic behavior), something I never do (even though I ride my bike all the time).
#42
Enjoy
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle metro
Posts: 6,165
Bikes: Trek 5200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bmclaughlin807
My problem with the helmet nannies is that they insist on making biking seem to be dangerous.
IT'S NOT DANGEROUS.
Your chances of dying on a bicycle are HUGELY smaller than your chances of dying in a car.
If I die on a bicycle,...
IT'S NOT DANGEROUS.
Your chances of dying on a bicycle are HUGELY smaller than your chances of dying in a car.
If I die on a bicycle,...
#43
Enjoy
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle metro
Posts: 6,165
Bikes: Trek 5200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by closetbiker
A lot of people say the smaller numbers of cyclists dying on the road has to do with the smaller number of cyclists on the road (as compared to motorists) but few acknowledge just how many people cycle on a regular basis.
#44
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
My position on helmets is simple and, I believe, shared by most serious bicyclists and BF members:
1) I oppose mandatory helmet laws for adult cyclists.
2) I choose to wear a helmet at all times while cycling.
3) Well aware of my helmet's limitations, I ride as though I inadvertently left it at home, to avoid feeling invincible.
4) I concur that a defensive riding style and highly visible clothing contribute far more to one's safety than any helmet ever can.
1) I oppose mandatory helmet laws for adult cyclists.
2) I choose to wear a helmet at all times while cycling.
3) Well aware of my helmet's limitations, I ride as though I inadvertently left it at home, to avoid feeling invincible.
4) I concur that a defensive riding style and highly visible clothing contribute far more to one's safety than any helmet ever can.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#45
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bannation, forever.
Posts: 2,887
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vrkelley
Maybe what we need is a ratio for comparisions. #ofCars:#injuries/year comparing #ofBikes:#injuries/year. Yes it's true, you're probably safer with an air bag
#47
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by John E
My position on helmets is simple and, I believe, shared by most serious bicyclists and BF members:
1) I oppose mandatory helmet laws for adult cyclists.
2) I choose to wear a helmet at all times while cycling.
3) Well aware of my helmet's limitations, I ride as though I inadvertently left it at home, to avoid feeling invincible.
4) I concur that a defensive riding style and highly visible clothing contribute far more to one's safety than any helmet ever can.
1) I oppose mandatory helmet laws for adult cyclists.
2) I choose to wear a helmet at all times while cycling.
3) Well aware of my helmet's limitations, I ride as though I inadvertently left it at home, to avoid feeling invincible.
4) I concur that a defensive riding style and highly visible clothing contribute far more to one's safety than any helmet ever can.
The keys being: opposing mandatory laws and making your own choices.
#48
Senior Member
Originally Posted by genec
+100
The keys being: opposing mandatory laws and making your own choices.
The keys being: opposing mandatory laws and making your own choices.
The problem is if Bicycling is misrepresenting a problem and offering an inferior solution to it's large audience. I haven't read the article so I can't say, but if it is, it's a pretty sad state of affairs.
**just went upstairs to the domestictic terminal building to look at the magazine, and it's not too bad.
The statement, "2/3rd's of cycling deaths are from traumatic brain injuries, according to the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute, & at least half of those could be prevented with the right noggin protection." is the biggest problem because they don't mention about 90% of those TBI deaths are the result of collisions with motor vehicles that the helmet is not designed for, but next to this claim is a description of just how the helmet is tested. Anyone with reasoning skills should be able to understand that a drop from 6 feet is not the same as being hit by a truck or car.
Last edited by closetbiker; 12-12-06 at 12:05 PM.
#49
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by closetbiker
+ 100%
The problem is if Bicycling is misrepresenting a problem and offering an inferior solution to it's large audience. I haven't read the article so I can't say, but if it is, it's a pretty sad state of affairs.
**just went upstairs to the domestictic terminal building to look at the magazine, and it's not too bad.
The statement, "2/3rd's of cycling deaths are from traumatic brain injuries, according to the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute, & at least half of those could be prevented with the right noggin protection." is the biggest problem because they don't mention about 90% of those TBI deaths are the result of collisions with motor vehicles that the helmet is not designed for, but next to this claim is a description of just how the helmet is tested. Anyone with reasoning skills should be able to understand that a drop from 6 feet is not the same as being hit by a truck or car.
The problem is if Bicycling is misrepresenting a problem and offering an inferior solution to it's large audience. I haven't read the article so I can't say, but if it is, it's a pretty sad state of affairs.
**just went upstairs to the domestictic terminal building to look at the magazine, and it's not too bad.
The statement, "2/3rd's of cycling deaths are from traumatic brain injuries, according to the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute, & at least half of those could be prevented with the right noggin protection." is the biggest problem because they don't mention about 90% of those TBI deaths are the result of collisions with motor vehicles that the helmet is not designed for, but next to this claim is a description of just how the helmet is tested. Anyone with reasoning skills should be able to understand that a drop from 6 feet is not the same as being hit by a truck or car.
The really sad thing is that Bicycling doesn't highlight why there are Bicycle deaths in the first place. Forget the helmet, which is much like a bandaid and only useful when and if one is falling... but what caused the falls in the first place? What can make cycling safer? Helmets do not cause safety, they are only a device to reduce certain head injuries.
#50
Senior Member
Originally Posted by genec
The really sad thing is that Bicycling doesn't highlight why there are Bicycle deaths in the first place.